Umbau Archivraum zu Büros im Verwaltungsgebäude Haus II, Friedrich-Ebert-Ring 92b,...

✓The place of performance is clearly the administrative building “Haus II” of Landkreis Havelland in Rathenow.

✓The special conditions specify the execution period: start of works on 18.01.2027 and completion (abnahmereife Fertigstellung) by 14.05.2027; these dates are contractual (Vertragsfristen) under §5 VOB/B, supplemented by further Einzelfristen from a Bauzeitenplan.

❓Quantities and technical details are contained in the Leistungsverzeichnis (not reproduced here but referenced as 2.02 LV).

✓Multiple Hauptangebote are expressly allowed; Nebenangebote are allowed for the entire scope, provided they meet qualitative/quantitative equivalence and are fully broken down in quantities and unit prices, including Gleichartigkeitsnachweis for alternative products or variants.

✓Offers may be submitted electronically (Vergabemarktplatz Brandenburg via Bietertool) or in writing; for any postal components, an “Angebotskennzettel” with the deadline (20.11.2026, 11:00, opening 11:05) is provided.

❓Such as regarding award criteria and weighting, the text mainly sets formal framework but does not explicitly list detailed point-based award criteria or their weighting.

✓It confirms that VOB/B and VOB/C form part of the contract and that Urkalkulation, price breakdowns (Formblätter 221/222/223) will be used in evaluation and for later contractual control.

✓Nebenangebote must be qualitatively and quantitatively equal to the base description; this implicitly affects their evaluation.

❓There is no explicit mention of qualitative scoring criteria (e.g. concept, quality, sustainability) or numeric weighting between price and quality in the provided excerpts; thus, it can be inferred that, under typical VOB/A practice, price will be central, but the documents here mostly regulate admissibility and transparency of offers rather than a detailed scoring system.

✓Such as concerning risks and special conditions, the “Besondere Vertragsbedingungen” and the BbgVergG‑Mindestentgeltvereinbarungen impose several obligations.

✓Contractual penalties (Vertragsstrafen) apply for delay: per §11 VOB/B and the special clause, a daily percentage of the objectively correct Abrechnungssumme (net) is payable for each day of delay in contractual interim milestones and completion; total penalties are capped at 5 % of the net settlement sum, or 3 % if only interim deadlines are breached but the final completion date is met.

✓Additional, separate contractual penalties under BbgVergG apply: for each proven case of underpayment or refusal of controls, a penalty of 1 % of the Auftragssumme (max. 25,000 € per case; overall max. 5 %, 250,000 €) can be claimed, also mirrored for Nachunternehmer/Verleiher.

✓The authority may impose an Auftragssperre (exclusion from competitions up to three years) and reports to a central Sperrliste; self-cleaning may reduce this.

✓Security for contract performance: generally waived, but if the Auftragssumme is ≥ 250,000 € (net), a 5 % performance security is required (§17 VOB/B) using the authority’s standard Bürgschaft form; for defects, a 3 % security is always required above an Abrechnungssumme of 35,000 € brutto, via retention or Mängelansprüchebürgschaft.

✓The contractor must accept a pauschaler Schadensersatz of 15 % of the gross contract sum if proven to have participated in anticompetitive collusion, save for evidence of lower damage.

✓Further special cost risks: a 0.34 % surcharge on the gross settlement sum for Baustrom/Bauwasser consumption and a 0.12 % share of the Bauleistungsversicherung, both deducted in the final invoice.

✓Labour‑law risks include strict minimum wage obligations (MiLoG 13.90 €/h from 1.1.2026, BbgVergG minimum 13.00 €/h), extensive documentation, acceptance of on‑site inspections, monthly bank payment of wages, and cascading obligations to Nachunternehmer and labour lenders.

✓Subcontracting is allowed but controlled: Einsatz and later replacement of Unterauftragnehmer requires prior written consent; all subcontractors must meet reliability, capability and compliance, and must sign parallel BbgVergG agreements and Eigenerklärungen; any Nachunternehmer with Auftragssperre must be promptly replaced.

✓Eignungsleihe is allowed but requires FB‑3‑05 and FB‑4‑05; where financial capacity is borrowed, joint liability with the lending firm is agreed.

✓The documents also emphasise that submission deadlines are binding and that missing documents requested with the offer will generally be nachgefordert; failure to supply requested confirmations within the set time leads to exclusion.

✓Such as regarding contradictions or corrections, the input text shows some differing thresholds and references that bidders must interpret in line with the most specific document.

❓For example, one Eigenerklärung refers to Wettbewerbsregister queries from 30,000 € net, another from 50,000 € net; similarly, one passage mentions queries to the Gewerbezentralregister pursuant to §150a GewO and Schwarzarbeitsbekämpfungsgesetz at 30,000 € (net).

❓These are not necessarily contradictions but reflect different legal instruments and template versions; in practice, the stricter (lower) threshold will apply whenever the authority is legally obliged to check.

✓Additionally, there are duplicate or slightly varied text blocks for Eigenerklärungen, BbgVergG‑Vereinbarungen and Besondere Vertragsbedingungen, but they consistently point to the same overall obligations (e.g. self‑cleaning possibility, Sperrliste, cascading obligations to Nachunternehmer).

✓Where forms distinguish between “mit dem Angebot einzureichen” and “auf Anforderung einzureichen”, the Verzeichnis 1.02 and the Anlage list clarify which statement applies: core forms (Angebotsschreiben, LV, FB‑2‑02, FB‑3‑06, and, if applicable, FB‑3‑03/‑04/‑05) must be submitted with the bid; subcontractor and Eignungsleihe commitment forms (FB‑4‑03/‑04/‑05/‑06) and many certificates are only required upon separate request by the Vergabestelle.