Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa

Clement What the numbers say about this buyer

• 34% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (783 awards since 2015, spread over 317 companies). 66% went to new names.n = 783 awards since 2015
• 96% of the bids received came from small and medium-sized enterprises (60 procedures with a bid mix). Country: 65%.n = 60
• The median procedure drew 2 bids (441 procedures with a bid count); 30% ended with a single bidder. Country: median 2.2 bids.n = 441
• The award came in at a median 95% of the estimated value (67 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually too high here. Country: 88%.n = 67
• Across 42 procedures with structured selection criteria, this buyer most often required: Staff qualifications (40 of 42), Equipment, plant and technical facilities (5 of 42), Independent quality certificate (e.g. ISO 9001) (3 of 42), Special authorisation or membership required (2 of 42).n = 42
• 3% of awards went to companies from abroad (783 awards with a known winner country). National average: 5%.n = 783
• 0% of the bids received came from other countries (60 procedures with a bid mix) — all bidders, not just the winners. Country: 2%.n = 60

From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 01/11/2026.