Öffentlicher Besucherdienst, Information und Interpretation für Besucher im Besucherzentrum des Naturschutzgebietes Riberas de Castronuño-Vega del Duero (Valladolid), Jahre 2027-2028

✓The criteria evaluable by formulas include, such as: “Horas de mejora sin cargo para Patrimonio Natural” (improvement hours without cost) with Subtipo Criterio 5 and “Oferta económica: Precio” with Subtipo Criterio 50, though the weighting fields in the text appear garbled (“Ponderación: 0”, “Ponderación: EUROS”, “Expresión de evaluación: 0”), indicating that the precise numerical weights or formulas must be checked directly in the PCAP or detailed tender notice.

✓Criteria evaluable by judgment of value include several qualitative aspects: 1.1 promotion of visits to the center; 1.2 guided interpretation of the center and its surroundings; 1.3 management and development of educational workshops (programs VEEN, Espacios Dorados, etc.); 1.4 promotion and management of educational, training and cultural activities; 2.1 description of service operation and detailed planning; 2.2 allocation of personnel, materials and technical means; 3.1 knowledge of the intervention area for work development and public information.

✓Each has an associated “Subtipo Criterio” (6, 7, 8, etc.), again with “Ponderación: 0” in the text, so detailed scoring must be verified in the official pliegos.

✓On risks and special conditions, the conditions of license and execution include, such as: a definitive performance guarantee of 5% of the contract amount, environmental execution conditions (“consideraciones de tipo medioambiental – Según PCAP”), and explicit mention that subcontracting is permitted.

✓The offer validity period is unusually long: “Plazo de Validez de la Oferta Hasta el 31/12/2029”, which means bids remain binding for over three years after the service period (2027–2028) begins, and this should be checked against the PCAP, as it may be an error or a generic system field.

✓There is no electronic auction (“Subasta electrónica: No”).

✓The reception of bids is electronic via PLACSP, with deadline “Hasta el 10/11/2026 a las 14:00”, and economic offer opening scheduled for “11/11/2026 a las 09:00 horas” at PRAE in Valladolid, a public act that can function de facto as a “site” where the contracting authority can be contacted, though no formal mandatory site visit is mentioned in the excerpt.

❓Penalties for non‑performance, detailed guarantee conditions, and insurance obligations are again only referenced indirectly (“Según PCAP”).

✓Regarding contradictions or corrections, the repeated blocks show consistent core information (object, values, CPV, execution period, procedure type, place, three envelopes, 5% definitive guarantee, no e‑auction).

✓However, there are some apparent inconsistencies or garbled fields, such as: different “Plazo de Presentación” dates (19/10/2026 vs 10/11/2026) appear in sections related to “Presentación de recursos” (appeals) versus “Plazo de Presentación de Oferta” (bids); in context, the bid deadline is clearly 10/11/2026 at 14:00, while 19/10/2026 at 14:00 likely concerns the deadline for administrative remedies regarding a previous phase or a system artifact.

✓Similarly, award criteria “Ponderación: 0” or “Ponderación: EUROS” and “Expresión de evaluación: 0” are not logically consistent; in practice, the applicable statement is the one contained in the PCAP and the detailed tender sheet on the Plataforma (via the deeplink URL given), which should be treated as the authoritative source for weights, formulas and any corrected figures.