C. Arbeiten. Projekt zur Anpassung eines an den Bahnhof angrenzenden Grundstücks für einen Parkplatz für Fahrzeuge in Ronda (Málaga).

✓The place of performance is Ronda (subentity Málaga, ES617, Spain), and the execution period is 10 months counted from the day after the Acta de Comprobación de Replanteo.

✓The standard contractual guarantee period is 1 year, although bidders may offer an extension.

✓No contract modifications are foreseen in the documents cited.

✓On award criteria and weighting, the procedure is “mejor relación calidad‑precio” but entirely based on automatically evaluable criteria (Archivo B) up to 100 points.

✓The main criterion is price: the best (lowest) non‑abnormally‑low offer receives 90 points, and other offers are scored proportionally using the formula “(Fm / Fi) × 90”, where Fm is the best offer and Fi the individual offer.

✓An additional objective criterion relates to the extension of the guarantee period beyond the mandatory 1‑year guarantee: such as, 5 points per extra year of guarantee, up to a maximum of 10 points.

✓Thus, price accounts for 90% and guarantee extension 10% of the total score; no other qualitative or non‑price criteria are mentioned in the excerpts.

✓Concerning risks and special conditions, the tender involves specific obligations due to the proximity to railway infrastructure and ADIF ownership.

✓The contractor must, prior to replanteo and start of works, furnish a special guarantee of 30.000 € in favour of ADIF (a model guarantee form is supplied) to cover potential damages to railway infrastructure, other losses or third‑party claims; ADIF may impose further guarantees if it deems necessary.

✓There is also a special obligation to execute the railway boundary wall as a priority and within a very short timeframe (with an indicative example of 10 working days of Piloto de seguridad ferroviario, budgeted at 4.800 €), given its role in railway safety and protection of the public domain.

✓General risks and obligations include: a 5% definitive guarantee (based on the bid price), monthly post‑measurement payments with no advance payments or payment for material stockpiling, strict compliance with labour, social security and health & safety rules, acceptance of no electronic ordering but mandatory electronic invoicing and payment, and classification of certain obligations (e.g. compliance with ADIF’s conditions, deadlines, and the municipal contract manager’s orders) as “obligaciones contractuales esenciales,” whose breach can cause contract termination under arts. 211 and 245 LCSP.

✓Subcontracting is allowed; the validity period of the offer is 10 months.

❓The text does not state a separate question deadline or mandatory site visit; if such exist, they are likely in the full Pliego but not in the fragments provided.

✓As for contradictions or corrections within the documents, the extracted parts are largely consistent: all sources concur on the contract type (works), object, location, 10‑month execution period, estimated value and budget, classification requirement G6‑3, non‑harmonised regime, open urgent procedure, use of PLACSP, criteria (90 points price, 10 points guarantee extension), 1‑year base guarantee, 5% definitive guarantee and existence of a 30.000 € special ADIF guarantee.

✓Minor differences (such as Plaza Duquesa de Parcent “3” vs “s/n” in some contact blocks, or repeated/overlapping text segments) are editorial and do not represent legal contradictions.

❓Where there is a conflict between summary fields on the platform and the detailed Pliegos, Spanish practice gives precedence to the approved Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas Particulares and Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas as the binding documents; the text explicitly cites approval and validation codes for these pliegos, confirming their primacy.