Dienstleistung zur Aktualisierung und Überprüfung des Urbanisierungsprojekts des Sektors 6: Binibèuqer Nou - S'Atalaia

✓On the scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the documents state that the object is the redaction of the update and review of the urbanization project for Sector 6 Binibeca Nou – S’Atalaia, initially authored by ECCP Joan Moll Serra in 2004.

✓Such as spelled out in the need report, tasks include: adapting alignments, green areas and public facilities to current NN.SS.; updating technical regulations (especially installations); revising materials and finishes for sidewalks and roadways, and lighting design and efficiency; structuring execution in phases according to the polygonal subdivision; revising and adapting the project’s report, specifications, safety and health study, quantity take-offs and budget; and drafting the documentation for a simplified environmental impact assessment under Balearic Law 12/2016.

✓The estimated contract value is 70,000 € (excluding VAT); the budget base de licitación is 70,000 € + VAT = 84,700 €.

✓The contract is classified under CPV 71240000 (architecture, engineering and planning services) and CPA 71.12.12.

✓The place of performance is Menorca (ES533), Spain.

✓The municipality will provide the awarded contractor with the existing project (plans, report, quantities and budget), topographical survey in CAD, and GIS/CAD planning modification plans.

✓Deliverables must be provided in non-editable signed digital formats (PDF) and also in editable forms (CAD for plans, word-compatible for text, BC3 for budget), and must include all standard components of an urbanization project: descriptive memorandum, situation/information plans, project and detail plans, technical and economic-administrative specifications, quantity take-offs, price breakdowns, budget, safety and health study, and waste management documentation.

✓Award criteria and weighting are clearly detailed and later corrected.

❓The contract uses multiple criteria with at least 51% of the score linked to quality, and judgment-of-value criteria capped at 45% of total, in line with LCSP arts. 145.4 and 159.1.b.

✓However, a complementary report dated 19/10/2026 corrects this and states that automatically quantifiable criteria sum to 75 points (still price 49, time reduction 10, BIM 16) and judgment-of-value criteria remain 25 points for the memòria tècnica.

✓Such as indicated in the complementary report, this corrected 75+25 scheme is the one that applies.

✓As to risks and special conditions (penalties, guarantees, subcontracting, validity period, question deadline, site visit), the texts provided focus mainly on solvency, format and subcontracting but still mention some risk-related aspects.

✓A definitive performance guarantee of 5% of the contract amount is required, as stated in the platform listing (“Garantía Requerida Definitiva Porcentaje 5 %”).

✓Subcontracting is explicitly not permitted: the platform notice says “Subcontratación permitida: No se permite la subcontratación,” and the need report explains that project drafting is considered a critical task under LCSP art. 215.2.e and therefore must be executed directly by the contractor without subcontracting.

❓The texts do not explicitly state the validity period of offers, question deadlines or any mandatory site visit; instead they mention a general 15-calendar-day period from publication for submitting tenders, electronic submission only, and that all further procedural characteristics, including any Q&A, are governed by the pliegos.

✓Such as highlighted in the governance documents, the Mayor’s resolution and the Junta de Gobierno’s agreement authorise the expenditure (84,700 €), approve the pliegos (administrative and technical), and order the publication of the tender notice on the contracting profile and public procurement platform.

✓Finally, regarding contradictions or corrections, the only explicit correction concerns the award criteria scoring.

✓The initial “Informe raonat de la necessitat” wrongly stated that automatically quantifiable criteria could reach 80 points and gave BIM only 10 points for full BIM plus digital twin.

✓The “Informe complementari” issued by the municipal architect on 19/10/2026 notes this error and modifies section 6 so that automatically quantifiable criteria total 75 points, with BIM worth 16 points for the same deliverable.

✓The Plataforma de Contratación notice is consistent with this corrected scheme.

✓Therefore, where there is a discrepancy between 80 and 75 points for automatic criteria and between 10 and 16 points for BIM, the corrected complementary report and the platform notice prevail and are the applicable interpretation for bidders.