Creación de videoclips animados para el proyecto Families Shaping the Future (F...

✓Award criteria and weighting are set out explicitly.

✓Such as: a financial offer (price and payment terms, including all production costs, voice‑over, correction rounds, usage rights and taxes) weighted at 35%; schedule and availability during the project period, and ability to meet deadlines and incorporate feedback promptly, weighted at 15%; fulfilment of technical and content requirements based on the specification (concept, storytelling, animation, voice‑over, simple language, diversity‑sensitivity, target‑group orientation and feasibility), weighted at 30%; and previous experience in the NGO/humanitarian sector and with inclusive, diversity‑sensitive, conflict‑sensitive communication, including relevant work samples or references, weighted at 20%.

✓Offers that are not essentially compliant may be rejected at IRC’s discretion.

✓Risks and special conditions are described mainly through procedural and ethical rules rather than classic penalties or guarantees.

✓Such as: no bid security is required; offers must be valid for 90 working days after bid opening, and validity may be extended in writing without altering the offer.

✓IRC reserves the right not to accept the lowest or any offer and may change timeline dates.

✓IRC may inspect products and reject non‑conforming deliverables, which the bidder must replace without deadline extension at IRC’s discretion.

✓There are strict rules against collusion: bidders may not submit offers through more than one company they own and related parties (family members, subsidiaries, employees with their own companies, partners) may not submit separate offers for the same tender; violations lead to exclusion from this and future IRC tenders and may be reported to other international agencies.

✓The code of conduct imposes high ethical standards (no corruption, theft, trafficking, exploitation, discrimination; respect for human rights; neutral humanitarian stance), applies to subcontractors, and requires disclosure of any conflict of interest with IRC staff; concealed conflicts or breaches can lead to immediate termination and exclusion from future activities.

✓Site visits at bidders’ premises may take place during the evaluation period (03.–15.11.2026).

✓Regarding contradictions or corrections, the text is largely consistent across repeated passages.

✓Such as: the general timeline (publication, intent‑to‑bid, question deadline, offer deadline, evaluation, site visit, award, contract start) is repeated identically in several places; the content of Annexes A–D appears duplicated but not changed.

✓There is no contradiction about currencies (all prices in EUR), validity (always 90 working days), or requirement that Annexes A–D be fully completed and signed.

✓Where the same clauses (e.g. on collusion, ethics, or inspection rights) appear both in the main RFP and Annex D, the statements are identical or complementary, so the safer interpretation is that all such repeated provisions apply cumulatively.

✓If a bidder encounters any perceived inconsistency, the documents designate the clarification mechanism (questions to [email protected] or via DTVP by 21.10.2026), and IRC’s written clarifications provided by 26.10.2026 then govern.