Reforma integral de edificio acceso, dotación de control de acceso y aparcamiento público, y mejora de urbanización de la Consejería de Agricultura, Ganadería y Medio Natural en Badajoz

✓The CPV code is 45210000 (building construction works).

✓The estimated value is 131,518.41 € and the bid base budget is 159,137.28 € (131,518.41 € without VAT).

✓The place of execution is Badajoz, sub-entity ES431, Spain.

✓The execution period is fixed at 8 months, with no extensions (0 prórrogas), justified under regional socially responsible contracting rules (Ley 12/2018).

✓Execution will be measured by units of work, with monthly investment curves compatible with the project’s funding schedule; the bidder’s programme of work must respect the total term and detail activities, durations (Gantt), critical path, and monthly production percentages.

✓As to award criteria and weighting, the tender follows the Extremadura Circular 4/2022, applying “best price‑quality ratio” with a dominant price component.

✓The total is 100 points, broken down as follows: (a) criteria evaluable by formula (automatic): price (Fórmula A) – up to 60 points, using the standard “Fórmula A” that awards maximum points to the highest percentage discount and scales the rest; and extension of guarantee period – up to 10 points, for months offered above the minimum contractual guarantee of 12 months, with a “satiation” threshold of +12 extra months (i.e. 24 months total), beyond which no further points are given nor can more be demanded in execution.

✓(b) Criteria evaluable by judgment of value – up to 30 points: 15 points for “Memoria descriptiva del proceso de ejecución y programa de trabajo”, 5 points for “Calidad” (Plan de Control de Calidad beyond the minimum legal/project requirements), 5 points for “Memoria de seguridad y salud” (organisation, analysis of the Safety and Health Study, emergency planning and coordination, etc.), and 5 points for “Tecnología en I+D+i” with strict length limits (max. 5 A4 pages, with explicit penalties if exceeded).

✓Each qualitative sub‑criterion is scored comparatively using scales such as “Excelente”, “Muy bueno”, “Bueno”, “Regular” and “Conforme a pliego”, mapped to percentages of the maximum sub‑score.

✓On risks and special conditions, the contract requires a definitive guarantee of 5 % of the award price.

✓There is explicit reference to possible penalties or even termination if the contractor breaches special execution conditions established under article 202 LCSP, especially those related to labour, Social Security and occupational health and safety obligations.

✓In addition, as a special condition of execution, the contractor must strictly comply with wage payments to staff executing the contract; the administration may require, with each invoice, a certificate by the company’s legal representative confirming that salaries are up to date.

✓Social and labour obligations from applicable collective agreements must be respected.

❓The text mentions coordination with subcontractors and autonomous workers in the safety and health plan, but the detailed limits and notifications on subcontracting are likely in the PCAP clauses not fully transcribed; no mandatory site visit is mentioned in the excerpts, nor explicit question deadline beyond the general platform practices.

✓All submissions must be in electronically signed PDF format, and the procedure to withdraw and re‑submit offers electronically within the deadline is described (including an exceptional email contact if the platform withdrawal is not used).

✓Finally, regarding contradictions or corrections, the documents explicitly record a rectification notice: where a previous announcement indicated a date “19/11/2026”, it is corrected to “23/11/2026” (this appears to concern the deadline or another relevant procedural date in the announcement).

✓There was also an error in the link to the PCAP in the pliegos announcement, which has been corrected pursuant to Law 39/2015 and the contracting regulations; after this correction, the PCAP is republished and bidders may withdraw any already-submitted offer and present a new one without it being considered an unjustified withdrawal.

✓No other substantive contradictions are evident in the provided excerpts; the solvency thresholds, scores and execution term appear consistent across announcements and the internal justification report.