Friedrich & ClementBETA

Cómo licitar en este país: plataformas, plazos, umbrales →

Adquisición, implementación y soporte de una solución de archivo de personal informatizado (DPI) integrado en beneficio de RTBF

Acquisition, mise en oeuvre et support d’une solution intégrée de Dossier du Personnel Informatisé (DPI) au profit de la RTBF — título original

BEBélgica · RTBF

Su camino hasta la presentación

  1. Plazo de presentación de ofertas: 16 de noviembre a las 10:30 — quedan 15 días.
  2. La oferta se presenta en BDA / e-Procurement Belgium, no aquí ni por correo electrónico. ↗
  3. Oferta y documentación acreditativa en: francés.
  4. Reúna la documentación acreditativa y use el análisis de solvencia de esta página: enumera los requisitos y, para los certificados conocidos, la vía de obtención.
Recopilado automáticamente a partir del anuncio de licitación y de los pliegos. Datos sin garantía; prevalece el tenor literal del procedimiento de contratación.

Qué busca el órgano de contratación

El objeto del presente contrato es la adquisición, ejecución, configuración, integración, reanudación de documentos, alojamiento, mantenimiento y soporte de un fichero informático integrado de personal (DPI) y una solución de gestión electrónica de documentos (EDM) para la Dirección General de Desarrollo y Recursos Humanos de la RTBF.

Traducción automática (eTranslation de la UE); el texto oficial, en el PDF enlazado.

Contrato

TipoServicios
Valor estimadoimporte no publicado
Publicado13 oct 2026
ProcedimientoProcedimiento abierto

Tipo de prestación

72 · Servicios informáticos
CPV 72000000

Clement Lo que dicen las cifras sobre este órgano de contratación

  • En este sector el órgano de contratación adjudica aproximadamente cada 13 meses (4 adjudicaciones, la última en febrero de 2025); a ese ritmo, la siguiente correspondía alrededor de marzo de 2026. La última adjudicación recayó en Skyline Communications.n = 4
  • El procedimiento mediano reunió 3 ofertas (45 procedimientos con número de ofertas); en el 18 % se quedó en un único licitador. Sector: mediana de 5 ofertas.n = 45
  • El 14 % de las adjudicaciones de este órgano de contratación recayó en empresas que ya habían ganado aquí antes (65 adjudicaciones desde 2021, repartidas entre 42 empresas). El 86 % recayó en nombres nuevos.n = 65 adjudicaciones desde 2021
  • El 26 % de las adjudicaciones recayó en empresas extranjeras (65 adjudicaciones con país del adjudicatario conocido). Media del sector: 29 %.n = 65

A partir de las adjudicaciones documentadas de este órgano de contratación; los valores de referencia proceden del mismo sector y del mismo país. Ni previsión ni asesoramiento jurídico. Datos a 25/10/2026.

Los pliegos de un vistazo

Lo esencial de los pliegos, contrastado frase a frase con los documentos. Para su oferta, cuentan los documentos originales.

Impulsado por eBriefing, tecnología lingüística de la UE. Friedrich es un servicio independiente, no una oferta de la UE.

✓ figura en los pliegos · ❓ no encontrado en los pliegos o indicación general · Disponible en inglés.

Public procurement for a digital personnel file solution at RTBF (POE2026.055)

The input text is an extract from a Belgian public procurement “cahier des charges” issued by RTBF (public broadcaster in Belgium) for the acquisition, implementation, hosting and maintenance of a “Dossier du Personnel Informatisé” (digital personnel file) solution.

The point of view is that of a Belgian contracting authority applying Belgian and EU public procurement rules, with references to operators and registers in other EU Member States (e.g.

France, Luxembourg) merely as examples.

The documents explain in detail what a bidder must submit.

Such as: a complete offer in French using the official forms (offer form and price inventory – annexe 1), a DUME/ESPD for each economic operator involved (each member of a group, and each supporting entity), proof that the signatory is duly empowered (statutes or proxy, plus delegation documents for groupings), detailed planning and payment milestones, contact details and backup, information on subcontracting (at least in the DUME and in the offer where relevant), a cybersecurity declaration using the Belgian CCB CyberFundamentals form or an ISO 27001 certificate, confirmations on SSO (Azure AD) and possibly WALLIX, data protection and hosting information, a charter of ethics, and all technical documentation requested in sections 30–37 (support modalities, functional and technical description, hosting architecture, accessibility, maintenance, migration and digitisation of existing records, training and change support, etc.).

Regarding minimum qualification requirements, the text sets out access and selection criteria.

Such as: mandatory and optional exclusion grounds (criminal convictions, non‑payment of taxes/social security, insolvency, grave professional misconduct, anticompetitive behaviour, conflicts of interest, serious past performance issues, false declarations) applied under Belgian law; use of the DUME as preliminary proof, with RTBF able to request original certificates before award.

For technical and professional capacity, bidders must provide a list of main services over the last three years in the relevant field, with mandatory indication of amount, date and recipient (public or private).

Specific minimum levels are imposed: at least two “probant” references directly related to the object of the contract (acquisition, implementation and maintenance of a DPI solution), using the same solution as proposed to RTBF, and each reference must cover a minimum of 3,000 personnel files.

Economic and financial capacity is explicitly marked “Sans objet”, i.e. no specific quantitative turnover requirement is stated.

The place of performance is RTBF’s sites (e.g.

Mostrar las 52 indicaciones

Boulevard Reyers, Brussels), with execution constrained by onsite safety and wellbeing regulations.

The bidder must provide a detailed execution planning with phases and milestones; this planning becomes contractually binding upon notification and is linked to payment milestones.

No site visit is explicitly described in the provided extracts, but any work on RTBF sites is subject to stringent safety and wellbeing requirements.

Award criteria and weighting are set out precisely.

A mandatory Proof of Concept (POC) is organised with each bidder to verify technical requirements and evaluate sub‑criteria 3.1 and 3.2.

The documents highlight numerous risks and special conditions for bidders.

Offers may be declared irregular and rejected for various reasons (wrong language, missing or incorrect documents, late submission, non‑compliance with technical specifications, inability to provide all services, insufficient French language mastery of personnel, essential non‑compliance in technical, security or GDPR aspects, failure to participate in POC).

The bid validity period is 150 calendar days from the deadline for receipt of offers.

On subcontracting, the documents impose transparency and security constraints.

Such as: the bidder must indicate in the offer the parts of the contract intended to be subcontracted and identify subcontractors, especially those involved in hosting the solution and data processing.

Given the nature of the data (HR and personal data), RTBF requires clarity on hosting providers and locations, and reminds that the general DPA conditions (Annexe 8.1) apply.

Use of third‑party capacities under article 78 LOI/73 AR PASSATION is allowed but requires firm, precise commitments covering the relevant part of the contract for the full duration, with no reservations; each such entity must provide its own DUME and meet access conditions.

RTBF emphasises information security and NIS2 readiness: bidders must provide either a CCB CyberFundamentals statement at level IMPORTANT or an ISO 27001 certification (with statement of applicability) covering the provided solution/services; RTBF reserves the right to audit security measures and may charge audit costs to the contractor if major discrepancies are found between declarations and audit results.

Such as: in case of internal contradiction, the following order applies: technical clauses of the cahier des charges, then administrative clauses, then the inventory, then other annexes.

The Q&A forum on eProcurement, the rectified cahier des charges and annexes all form part of the contract documents.

In terms of legal contradictions between sources of proof, the DUME is explicitly required and cannot be replaced by attaching supporting documents alone; supporting documents are complementary and may be requested at any time, but absence of DUME automatically renders the offer irregular.

Answers on the required criteria

Must securities be provided (bid bond, performance or warranty guarantee)? If so: which, in what amount and by when?

Such as regards securities, the contract requires the successful tenderer (adjudicataire) to provide financial guarantees but does not mention any bid bond.

Specifically, the adjudicating authority sets a “cautionnement” (performance-type guarantee) at 5% of the total amount of inventory items 1 to 9 of the successful offer (Section 12.2).

This cautionnement can be constituted in cash, public funds, collective guarantee or bank/insurance guarantee and must be constituted within thirty days of conclusion of the contract, with proof provided before commencement of performance.

It is released in one instalment after technical acceptance of the software.

In addition, the contractor must take out insurance for work accidents and third-party liability (Section 12.1), with evidence to be provided within thirty days of contract conclusion.

No separate warranty bond is specified beyond these mechanisms.

Is subcontracting allowed? If so: with which limits and which disclosure duties?

Such as concerns subcontracting, the text explicitly allows it but under tight conditions and disclosure duties (Section 14 and linked DPA annexes).

The tenderer must indicate in its offer the part of the contract intended to be subcontracted and the proposed subcontractors, including: the services likely to be performed by subcontractors; the identity of subcontractors involved in hosting; maintenance, support, specific developments, migration or data recovery; and the location of infrastructures used.

No subcontractor may be in an exclusion situation (Section 6.1), and the tenderer is bound by the list of subcontractors submitted at least via the DUME/ESPD.

As such, changing subcontractors later is only possible on motivated request and with prior written consent of RTBF.

Subcontractors have no rights against the contracting authority, and the adjudicataire remains solely responsible for performance and for its subcontractors’ compliance, including under the data processing agreement annexes.

Is there a site visit, and is attendance mandatory? If so: when?

Such as site access and meetings, the text does not provide for a formal pre-tender site visit for bidders nor indicate any mandatory visit during the bidding phase.

In which language must the tender and the supporting documents be submitted, and are documents in other languages accepted?

Such as language requirements, the offer must be drawn up in French (Section 7.1).

The language of contract execution is French (Section 13): all correspondence with RTBF and any written deliverables (documents, reports, analyses, technical/functional documentation, user manuals, training materials, minutes, etc.) must be exclusively in French, and meetings, workshops, trainings, demos, tests and steering committees are held in French.

Documents originally in another language may be translated by the economic operator itself; a sworn translator is not required.

In case of dispute, the French translation prevails vis-à-vis the contracting authority.

How long is the bidder bound by the tender (validity period), and is there a deadline for bidder questions? If so: until when?

Such as the validity period and bidder questions, the tenderer is bound by its offer for 150 calendar days from the deadline for receipt of tenders (Section 7.4).

Questions must be submitted via the e-Procurement forum only (Section 1.2), as RTBF may refuse to answer questions raised via other channels.

While no explicit “last day for questions” is stated, the text sets a specific deadline for pointing out errors or omissions in the tender documents: any operator discovering errors/omissions making pricing or comparison of offers impossible must notify the contracting authority immediately and at the latest ten (10) calendar days before the tender submission deadline (Section “Interprétations, erreurs et omissions”).

Further details

The input text is a Belgian public procurement “cahier des charges” issued by RTBF for a services contract to acquire, implement and support an integrated “Dossier du Personnel Informatisé” (HR personnel file system).

It sets out the legal and operational framework of the procedure from a Belgian law / EU law point of view, including selection, award criteria, financial guarantees, subcontracting, language of the procedure and execution, and communication via the federal e-Procurement platform.

However, it does foresee a mandatory “réunion de démarrage” (kick-off meeting) after contract award, before any services are performed, at which specific instructions (notably RGPD and integration in RTBF’s information systems) are given; no service may be executed before this meeting has taken place (Section 18.2.2).

Execution may take place on RTBF’s headquarters site in Brussels or at the contractor’s premises, within normal office hours (Section 17.2).

After the (possibly extended) tender deadline, bidders can no longer rely on such errors or omissions.

Complete los datos de su empresa — le mostraremos si cumple los requisitos de volumen de negocio, seguro y referencias →

Solo son vinculantes los pliegos del órgano de contratación. Fecha: 19/10/2026

Clement
Sus referencias y certificados del país de origen tienen plena validez en toda la UE; para eso existe el derecho europeo de la contratación pública.

Criterios de solvencia — en los pliegos de la licitación

El órgano de contratación indica en el anuncio de licitación que los criterios de solvencia figuran en los pliegos (enlace en esta página) y no en el formulario europeo. El análisis de documentos que aparece más abajo los extrae de ahí — oferta y documentación en Francés.

Análisis de solvencia a partir de los pliegos

Pliegos — descarga directa

⤓
Anexo 1
Pliegos y anexos en el órgano de contratación: normalmente accesibles sin registro
⤓
Pliego de cláusulas administrativas
El anuncio completo, texto oficial

Quién ha ganado hasta ahora con este órgano

Todos los tipos de contrato de este órgano, no solo este sector. Un ayuntamiento compra software y camiones de bomberos en el mismo servicio de compras.

EmpresaAdjudicacionesPeriodo
STUDIOTECH42025
Diginet32025
VP Media Solutions32025
SKYLINE COMMUNICATIONS22025
Collignon ENG22025–2026
Según las adjudicaciones registradas · quienes ganan con regularidad conocen los requisitos de este órgano: esa es su competencia.

Con qué frecuencia este órgano licita algo así

2
2022
11
2024
12
2025
6
2026
31 procedimientos en esta categoría desde 2019. La contratación pública se repite: quien conoce el ritmo se prepara en lugar de reaccionar.

Contacto del órgano de contratación

Correo electrónico[email protected]
·
Plazo — lunes, 16 de noviembre, 10:30

Táctica

Cuando se adjudicaron contratos en este país y sector, solían llegar 5 ofertas o más. Aquí se presentan muchos: deciden el precio y las referencias. (Según 1480 adjudicaciones concluidas; no es una afirmación sobre este procedimiento.)

Este procedimiento da 34 días entre la publicación y el plazo; lo habitual en este país son 34 (mediana de 3181 procedimientos). Un margen normal para este mercado.

El plazo vence en lunes: su último día laborable completo es el viernes anterior. Tenga justificantes y garantías listos el jueves.

Licitadores extranjeros

En Bélgica · Servicios informáticos, 537 contratos de los últimos 3 años se adjudicaron a empresas extranjeras (de 2133 adjudicaciones registradas) — sobre todo de Francia, Alemania, Luxemburgo.

Lengua de la oferta: Francés.

Medido sobre datos de adjudicación vinculados; los adjudicatarios extranjeros que licitan a través de una filial nacional cuentan como nacionales, por lo que la proporción real es mayor.

Cómo presentar una oferta

Leer el anuncio completo — Original y documentación
Lleva directamente a esta licitación en TED — Tenders Electronic Daily. Allí están los pliegos y todos los anexos.
Este procedimiento está publicado en 2 plataformas
Las ofertas se presentan en BDA / e-Procurement Belgium: TED publica el mismo anuncio, normalmente con los pliegos más detallados. Lea ambos.
TEDAnuncioBDA / e-Procurement BelgiumPlataforma de presentación
Reunir la documentación — en Francés
Certificados, referencias y su precio, según el anuncio.
Presentación a través de TED — Tenders Electronic Daily antes del plazo
Presentación electrónica: la primera vez, reserve tiempo para el registro en la plataforma.
A la plataforma de contratación →Anuncio oficial en TED →
Recopilamos datos de millones de anuncios. Si el enlace no funciona, avísenos: nos ocupamos de encontrar el correcto.

No se pierda el próximo

Friedrich encuentra licitaciones como esta por usted — cada mañana a las 7:30, cada una revisada por Claude (Anthropic), y aprende de sus respuestas a qué se dedica de verdad su empresa.

Quiero recibirlas