Obras de reordenación de la rotonda de la calle Sant Antoni con la Avenida de Sa Pau

✓Regarding the scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the object is “Obras de reordenación de la rotonda de la calle Sant Antoni con la Avenida de Sa Pau”, specifically the construction of a central roundabout with remountable kerb around the existing lamppost, and the adaptation of pavements, kerbs, and elevated pedestrian crossings.

✓The estimated contract value is 68,223.55 EUR (without VAT), with a tender base budget of 82,550.50 EUR including 21% VAT (82,550.5 EUR in the announcement).

✓The place of performance is coded ES533 (Menorca), identified as CEIP Sa Garriga area, in Sant Lluís. The execution period is 2 months, starting from the signature of the “acta de comprobación y replanteo” (site check and setting-out).

✓The project is declared “obra completa”, meaning that once finished and received, the works can be put to public use.

✓Concerning award criteria and weighting, the contract uses a single criterion: price (execution price without VAT), evaluated with a formula.

✓The criterion has 100% weighting (100 points).

✓The score is computed as: Puntuación = 100 × (precio licitación − oferta licitante) / (precio licitación − oferta más baja).

✓All prices in the formula must include all concepts except VAT.

✓Thus, the lowest price gets 100 points, and other offers are linearly scored between the tender budget and the lowest offer.

✓There are no qualitative or non-price criteria and no electronic auction.

✓On risks and special conditions, the documents underline several points.

✓A definitive guarantee of 5% of the final offered price (excluding VAT) must be constituted by the successful bidder, following article 107 LCSP; this need for a definitive guarantee is expressly cited as the reason for choosing the ordinary “open simplified” procedure rather than the abbreviated one.

✓Price revision is expressly not foreseen because the execution term is under one year.

✓Subcontracting is allowed on a partial basis, as the works are not secret or reserved, and there are no critical tasks; it is stated that coordinated subcontracting should not harm execution or deadlines.

✓The contract is not divided into lots, with justification that splitting would complicate coordination and technical execution, although article 99 LCSP generally encourages lots.

✓The technical clauses reference insurance of works, mutual indemnities, treatment of defective units, conservation of the work, and guarantees for material damage due to defects, although detailed penalty regimes are only indicated generically (fiances, indemnitzacions, unitats defectuoses) without specific amounts in the excerpts.

✓The project notes that the Spanish Building Code (CTE) is not applicable since no buildings are affected, but that a quality control plan is still implemented, aligned with Art. 7 CTE Part I and Decree 59/1994 (Balearic control of quality in construction).

✓As such, controls include systematic reception of products (documentation, CE marking, quality marks, tests), control of execution and of the finished work.

✓The contract accepts electronic invoicing and is not co-financed by EU funds.

✓The deadline for submitting tenders is 11/11/2026 at 23:59; additional information and pliegos can be obtained from the contracting authority until the same date and time.

✓The opening of the single envelope is scheduled for 12/11/2026 at 11:00, in a private act at the Town Hall.

❓No mandatory site visit is mentioned in the provided text, nor is any explicit validity period of offers specified in the excerpts (it will presumably be in the full administrative clauses).

✓Regarding contradictions or corrections within the documents, the main apparent discrepancies are minor and largely reconciled in the text.

✓For example, the budget appears as 82,550.5 EUR in the announcement and 82,550.50 EUR in the project; given the detailed breakdown in the project (material execution 55,466.30 EUR plus industrial profit, overheads and 21% VAT), the more precise figure 82,550.50 EUR seems the technical base, while the announcement rounds to one decimal place.

✓Another apparent tension is that the project states “En aquest projecte no és d’aplicació el CTE” (CTE not applicable), yet the attached quality control plan explicitly refers to Art. 7 CTE and its control requirements.

✓The text itself resolves this by explaining that Decree 59/1994 is in force and partially overlaps CTE, and that the plan covers materials required by the CTE documents even though, strictly, CTE is not mandatory because no buildings are involved.

❓In practice, where slight numeric rounding differs, the contracting authority will likely apply the detailed figures from the approved project (INF.129-2025 and the project budget) as authoritative.