Servicio de atención al público, información e interpretación para visitantes en la Casa del Parque del Acebal de Garagüeta (Soria), años 2027-2028

✓Concerning the scope of the contract, the input text defines the object as “Servicio de atención al público, información e interpretación para visitantes en la Casa del Parque del Acebal de Garagüeta (Soria), años 2027-2028.” Place of performance is the Casa del Parque Acebal de Garagüeta in the province of Soria (sub-entity ES417, Spain).

✓The contract duration is 2 years, corresponding to 2027–2028, and includes, such as, public visitor attention, provision of information, interpretative guidance about the center and its environment, and the design and implementation of educational programs and workshops.

❓Quantities (e.g., number of staff or hours) are not detailed in this extract, and must be taken from the technical specifications (Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas) referenced but not reproduced here.

✓Regarding award criteria and weighting, the tender uses both formula-based and judgment-based criteria.

✓As indicated, the economic envelope (Sobre 3) is assessed via formulas, with criteria such as: price (“Oferta económica: Precio”) with a sub-type criterion marked “50,” and hours of improvement without charge (“Horas de mejora sin cargo para Patrimonio Natural”) with a sub-type criterion “5.” The text labels “Ponderación: EUROS” for price and “Ponderación: 0” for the improvement hours, but the exact numerical weighting in points is not clearly rendered in the excerpt and may be misformatted, so the precise scoring scale should be checked directly in the PCAP.

✓The judgment-of-value criteria in Sobre 2 are listed with sub-type criteria values (6, 7, 8 etc.), and they refer to, such as, promotional proposals, interpretive proposals, management of VEEN and Espacios Dorados workshops, other educational and cultural activities, detailed work planning, resource allocation, and local area knowledge.

✓However, again the excerpt shows “Ponderación: 0” for these, suggesting that the actual point weighting per criterion is defined more clearly in the original PCAP document.

✓On risks and special conditions, the text mentions a definitive guarantee requirement of 5% of the contract amount, which the awarded contractor must provide.

✓Subcontracting is explicitly permitted (“Subcontratación permitida”).

✓There are special environmental execution conditions (“Consideraciones de tipo medioambiental - Según PCAP”), implying obligations related to environmental protection that will be detailed in the PCAP and could entail specific performance risks or penalties.

✓The validity period of the offer is unusually long, specified as “Hasta el 31/12/2029,” meaning bids remain binding until that date.

✓Timelines include, such as, the deadline for obtaining tender documents (until 09/11/2026 at 14:00), the deadline for submission of offers (also 09/11/2026 at 14:00), and the public opening of economic offers and documentation scheduled for 10/11/2026 at 09:00 at PRAE, Cañada Real 306, Valladolid.

❓Penalties, insurance obligations, and any site visit requirements are not described in the excerpt and must be checked in the referenced PCAP and technical specifications.

✓As for contradictions or corrections within the documents, the core procedural information is repeated consistently between the announcement (01-placsp-4) and the tender documents notice (02-placsp-7): same contract object, amounts, duration (2 years 2027–2028), location (Soria), open procedure, electronic submission, CPV code, solvency references to the PCAP, three-envelope structure, and the opening date 10/11/2026 at 09:00.

✓There is another date mentioned: “Plazo de Presentación Hasta el 19/10/2026 a las 14:00,” which appears in the section dealing with “Presentación de recursos” (submission of appeals or remedies) rather than offer submission; this suggests that 09/11/2026 is the correct deadline for submitting offers, while 19/10/2026 likely refers to a different procedural deadline linked to legal remedies.

❓Similarly, the weighting lines show “Ponderación: 0” next to several criteria, which is probably a formatting or extraction issue rather than the actual weighting; the legally binding values are those in the original PCAP and must prevail in case of any discrepancy with this extracted text.