Mellora da mobilidade peonil na E.P. 2405 Cerquido-Budiño, dende o P.Q. 0+000 ao P.Q. 1+220. Concello do Porriño

✓Such as: the works are “trabajos de construcción” under CPV 45000000, with a base tender budget of 1,035,018.49 EUR (including VAT) and an estimated value of 855,387.18 EUR (excluding VAT).

✓The execution period is eight (8) months, counted from the date of the staking-out verification act (acta de comprobación de replanteo), provided that the safety and health plan and the waste management plan have been approved, as detailed in clause 21 of the PCAP.

❓No extensions (prórrogas) are foreseen.

✓The contract is not divided into lots, justified technically because splitting the work among multiple contractors would hinder coordination of all work units.

✓The place of performance is Spain, Province of Pontevedra, municipality of O Porriño, with territorial code ES114.

✓Offers must be submitted electronically via PLACSP by 10/11/2026 at 10:00, with opening of economic offers scheduled for 12/11/2026 at 10:00 at the Presidency of the Diputación Provincial.

✓The award criteria and weighting are described explicitly and follow a multi-criteria “best quality-price ratio” approach.

✓Such as: criteria evaluated by formulas include (i) lowest price offered, worth 60 points; (ii) extension of the percentage of quality control beyond the minimum required, up to a maximum of 3% of the material execution budget, worth 5 points; (iii) extension of the guarantee period up to a maximum total of 36 months, worth 5 points; and (iv) commitment to apply a quality control system linked to the object of the contract (UNE‑EN ISO 9001 or equivalent), worth 5 points.

✓Criteria evaluated by value judgment include a technical proposal, worth 25 points, subdivided into elements such as: work programme and schedule (memoria e programa de traballo), environmental action plan (plan de actuacións medioambientais), and the organization and application of ISO 9001 quality principles.

✓It also emphasizes that caps on quality control and guarantee extensions are legally admissible, proportionate and tied to the contract’s object.

✓On risks and special conditions, the documentation notes several execution conditions to be set out in the PCAP under article 202 LCSP, of social, environmental and innovation type.

✓Such as: obligations to use inclusive language, ensure payment to subcontractors, and comply with the latest applicable collective agreement for working conditions.

✓Subcontracting is expressly permitted.

✓The risk management dimension is reflected in the requirement for experienced technical staff, justified by the safety impact of pedestrian mobility works, potential accidents, and the complexity of an urban environment with affected services and traffic: defective execution could lead to increased accident rates and economic and patrimonial liability for the Administration.

❓Penalties, guarantees, insurance details, and the precise period of offer validity or question deadlines are not spelled out in the extract but are referred to as contained in the PCAP and standard LCSP rules (including performance bonds and liability insurance requirements typical for works contracts; the text does highlight that payment to subcontractors is monitored as a special condition).

✓Regarding contradictions or corrections within the documents, the excerpts presented are largely consistent and cross‑referenced by secure verification codes (CSV), indicating that the “memoria justificativa”, the announcement and the PCAP are aligned.

❓Any detailed hierarchy for resolving conflicts (e.g.

✓PCAP prevailing over other texts) would be in the PCAP clauses, but the input does not reveal conflicting statements; instead, it stresses that the contract cannot include stipulations that create rights and obligations different from those provided in the specifications, and that the pregos (PCAP and PPT) plus the awarded offer will define the binding terms.