Pavimentación Calle Santa Vera Cruz II Fase en Osorno la Mayor

✓Sobre B contains the technical offer, a single “memoria” covering the aspects listed in section H4 of the Cuadro de Características Particulares of the PCAP (for example process of execution, programming, and environmental measures).

✓Sobre C contains the economic offer, structured according to Annex II of the PCAP; in case of discrepancy between the amount typed in the electronic tool and the PDF/attached economic offer, the latter prevails.

✓Such as defined in the “Condiciones de adjudicación”, the award criteria are mixed: 60 points for the price criterion (formula‑based), 34 points for “Proceso de ejecución y programación de las obras” (evaluated by judgment of value), and 6 points for “Minimización de los efectos negativos en aquellos factores del medio ambiente afectados por la obra” (environmental improvements, also by judgment of value).

❓Thus, price is heavily weighted but the qualitative programming and environmental proposals together represent 40% of the score.

✓The contract requires a 5% “Garantía definitiva” over the contract amount, to be constituted by the awardee as per the PCAP.

✓Payments will be made monthly, against work certificates (“mensual, mediante certificación de obra”).

✓The procedure is “Abierto”, “ordinario” and “anticipado”; offers must be submitted electronically through PLACSP until 16/11/2026 at 23:59, and the same deadline applies for obtaining the pliegos.

❓Such as is typical in Spanish public works tenders, the PCAP (Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas Particulares) will contain further risk‑related conditions not fully quoted here: penalties for delay or defective performance, rules on subcontracting, validity period of offers and possible site visit obligations.

✓The excerpt explicitly mentions only the definitive guarantee (5%), the monthly certification payment regime, and the absence of harmonized regulation applicability (not subject to EU procurement directives threshold regime).

✓It also notes that there is a technical project and acta de replanteo incorporated into the expediente, and that a supervision report exists but a formal high‑level supervision report is not required because the budget is below 500.000 EUR and the works do not affect stability, safety or watertightness.

❓No explicit question deadline is given beyond the general pliego‑obtention period, and no mandatory site visit is mentioned in this excerpt, so any such obligations must be verified directly in the PCAP and PPT.

✓Contradictions or corrections within the documents are minimal in the provided text: the contract value is consistently stated as 64.462,82 EUR (importe sin impuestos / valor estimado) and 78.000,00 EUR (importe con IVA / presupuesto de proyecto).

✓The procedure is consistently “abierto”, execution period 4 months, and guarantee 5% definitive.

✓Where the text says “Criterio de Solvencia Técnica‑Profesional: Otros – detallada en Pliegos” and similarly for economic solvency, this is not a contradiction but a cross‑reference to missing detailed requirements.

✓In case of discrepancies in the offered price between the electronic tool and the formal economic offer document, the pliegos explicitly state that the latter (the document in Sobre C according to Annex II PCAP) prevails, which resolves any internal contradiction on pricing data entry.