Cómo licitar en este país: plataformas, plazos, umbrales →
Desarrollo, mantenimiento & alojamiento del sitio web urbano y subsitios de la ciudad de Nieuwpoort
Ontwikkeling, onderhoud & hosting van de stedelijke website en de subsites van Stad Nieuwpoort — título original
Su camino hasta la presentación
- Plazo de presentación de solicitudes de participación: 25 de noviembre a las 11:00 — quedan 24 días. Procedimiento en dos fases: hasta este plazo se presenta la solicitud de participación (acreditación de solvencia). Solo las empresas seleccionadas son invitadas después a presentar oferta.
- La oferta se presenta en BDA / e-Procurement Belgium, no aquí ni por correo electrónico. ↗
- Reúna la documentación acreditativa: los criterios de solvencia figuran en esta página y, para muchos de ellos, el análisis le indica cómo obtenerlos.
Qué busca el órgano de contratación
Desarrollo, mantenimiento & alojamiento de los sitios web urbanos y subsitios de la ciudad de Nieuwpoort. Parcelas / Lotes: Desarrollo, mantenimiento & alojamiento del sitio web urbano y subsitios de la ciudad de Nieuwpoort.
Contrato
Tipo de prestación
Los pliegos de un vistazo
Lo esencial de los pliegos, contrastado frase a frase con los documentos. Para su oferta, cuentan los documentos originales.
Impulsado por eBriefing, tecnología lingüística de la UE. Friedrich es un servicio independiente, no una oferta de la UE.
✓ figura en los pliegos · ❓ no encontrado en los pliegos o indicación general · Disponible en inglés.
Public tender for development, maintenance and hosting of the city website(s) of Stad Nieuwpoort
The input text concerns a Belgian public procurement procedure launched by Stad Nieuwpoort (Belgium) for a services contract relating to the development, hosting, maintenance and further evolution of its main city website and several subsites.
It is clearly written from the point of view of Belgian and EU public sector regulation, explicitly referring to Belgian laws on public procurement and social law and to EU regulations such as the GDPR and the AI Regulation.
The tender sets out administrative rules, qualitative selection criteria, award criteria and detailed contractual and technical provisions, including information security, hosting, continuity and liability.
Such as in the administrative part, the text specifies that this is a service contract awarded via a simplified negotiated procedure with prior publication under the Belgian public procurement law of 17 June 2016.
The scope of the contract covers six websites: the main municipal site (nieuwpoort.be) plus five subsites (Centrum Ysara & City, Woonzorgcentrum De Zathe, Westfront museum, Huis van het Kind, and the municipal school De Pagaaier).
The solution must be offered as “Website as a Service” (WaaS), including development, hosting within the EER, maintenance, support, security updates, yearly audits and pentests, back‑ups and monitoring.
The initial contractual term is four years (service years 2027–2030) with two possible one‑year extensions (up to 2032), and each website has a separate 12‑month warranty period starting from its provisional acceptance.
Such as regarding what bidders must submit and minimum qualifications, the text lays out detailed exclusion and selection criteria.
Economically, bidders must show an average annual turnover of at least EUR 250,000 (excl.
VAT) over the last three financial years, proved by a turnover declaration.
Technically, they must demonstrate a WaaS model, a full CMS (no coding needed for editors), compliance with WCAG 2.1 AA, and robust information security and quality management via ISO 27001 and ISO 9001 or equivalent systems, with equivalence to be demonstrated by the bidder.
Mostrar las 58 indicaciones
At least five references for similar assignments for local authorities in the last three years are mandatory, each with a minimum contract value of EUR 50,000 excl.
VAT, executed by the bidder as main contractor and backed by attestations of good execution.
The checklist of documents to be attached to the offer is extensive: completed and signed offer form (Annex A) and inventory (Annex B), criminal record extract, turnover declaration, descriptions of WaaS, CMS, WCAG compliance, technical architecture, modules, hosting, SLA, project approach, planning, training, security measures, NIS2 compliance, continuity and exit strategy, test environment access, design concept, as well as sub‑processors list, AI functionalities description and representation powers where applicable.
Such as for award criteria and weighting, the contract is awarded to the economically most advantageous regular tender based on four criteria: price (30 points), quality of the proposed concept and technical solution (40 points), SLA/maintenance/support (20 points), and project management and training (10 points).
Price is scored mathematically according to a “rule of three” using the lowest regular offer as reference.
The quality criterion is subdivided into CMS/structure/usability (20 points), functional completeness of modules and features (10 points), integrations and technical architecture (5 points), and graphic concept and UX (5 points), each scored on a five‑level qualitative scale from “excellent” to “unacceptable.” SLA/maintenance/support and project management/training are similarly broken down into sub‑criteria (response times, availability guarantees, security, monitoring, backup and recovery, support and ticketing, planning, risk analysis, documentation and ongoing training).
Demonstrations and a test environment of the CMS are compulsory parts of the evaluation; failure to provide them may cause evaluation only on the written offer.
Such as in the area of risks and special conditions, the text imposes strict rules on subcontracting, insurances, liability, continuity and penalties.
Subcontractors whose capacity was used for selection must actually be used; new subcontractors require prior consent, and all concerned entities must meet exclusion rules.
Minimum insurances include operational civil liability, post‑delivery civil liability, professional liability and cyber/data risk insurance, with adequate coverage and proof via insurer attestations.
SLA breaches can trigger contractual penalties: EUR 250 per started calendar day of overrun for critical incident resolution time, EUR 500 per day of availability below the guaranteed level, EUR 500 per breach of RPO/RTO, and EUR 500 per breach of incident/datalek reporting duties, capped at 10% of original contract value per contract year, without prejudice to recovery of higher actual damages or contract termination.
An extensive exit and continuity clause obliges the contractor, upon any termination, to cooperate fully and free of charge with migration, maintain hosting and services during transition, and deliver all data, configurations, documentation and, for custom components, source artifacts, then to destroy confidential data (with proof) subject to legal retention.
The contractor must comply with GDPR, NIS2 and the EU AI Regulation, be transparent about any use of website data to train AI systems, and obtain prior permission from the city.
Such as for procedural conditions, question and submission deadlines and possible contradictions, the text fixes a last date for questions (18 November 2026) and a bid submission deadline (25 November 2026 before 11:00) via the federal e‑Procurement/e‑Tendering platform only; any other submission mode (email, postal mail) is irregular.
Answers and any rectifications or clarifications published via e‑Procurement become binding parts of the tender documents, and bidders cannot later invoke ignorance of such messages.
The binding period of offers (verbintenistermijn) is explicitly extended to 180 days from the bid deadline, in deviation from the standard 90 days of the Belgian placement decree, and this explicit clause prevails over general regulations.
The text also indicates that any contradictory vendor terms are deemed not written and unenforceable against the contracting authority.
Where equivalence to ISO standards or other requirements is allowed, the principle is that the bidder must prove equivalence and the authority retains discretion to request additional evidence.
Answers on the required criteria
Must securities be provided (bid bond, performance or warranty guarantee)? If so: which, in what amount and by when?
Regarding securities and guarantees, the text does not mention any bid bond or performance bond requirement as such; instead, it regulates risk through insurance, SLA-penalties and warranty terms.
In addition, there is a twelve‑month “waarborgtermijn” per website starting at provisional acceptance, during which all defects due to design, configuration, development or implementation faults must be corrected free of charge.
Contractual sanctions are defined (for example €250 per day for exceeding critical SLA deadlines and €500 per day for downtime or security breaches), but no explicit bank guarantees or bid/performance bonds are required in the provided text.
Is subcontracting allowed? If so: with which limits and which disclosure duties?
On subcontracting, the tender explicitly allows the use of underaannemers and other entities’ capacities, subject to strict conditions.
Such as: if the bidder relies on the qualitative capacity (studie- en beroepskwalificaties, relevante beroepservaring) of pre-identified subcontractors for selection, these subcontractors must then actually be used in performance.
Any other subcontractors may only be engaged with prior consent of the contracting authority.
The contractor remains fully liable towards the authority for all obligations, and the authority has no direct contractual link to the subcontractors.
Subcontractors whose capacity is used must not be in an exclusion situation under article 67 of the Wet van 17 juni 2016 unless they demonstrate “corrigerende maatregelen” under article 70. There are also specific obligations to impose labour-law clauses on subcontractors (e.g. relating to illegal third-country nationals and timely payment of wages), and to ensure that subcontractors hold appropriate insurances and comply with confidentiality and data protection obligations.
Is there a site visit, and is attendance mandatory? If so: when?
Concerning site visits, the text provided does not describe any place visit, inspection or “plaatsbezoek”, nor does it make attendance at any visit mandatory.
These demo and test environment obligations form part of the evaluation of the gunning criteria, but no physical visit to municipal premises is stipulated in the excerpt.
In which language must the tender and the supporting documents be submitted, and are documents in other languages accepted?
Regarding the language of the tender and documents, the offer must be drawn up in Dutch.
Such as: “De inschrijver maakt zijn offerte op in het Nederlands” and all documents prepared, completed or signed by the tenderer must be dated and signed accordingly.
The text does not explicitly state that supporting documents in other languages are accepted; where certificates are requested (ISO, references, criminal record extract, foreign tax/social certificates), the expectation is that they be submitted in a form the authority can assess, but any deviation from Dutch is not directly regulated in the excerpt, so the safe interpretation is that the main tender and narrative documents must be in Dutch.
How long is the bidder bound by the tender (validity period), and is there a deadline for bidder questions? If so: until when?
On tender validity and bidder questions, the verbintenistermijn is explicitly set at 180 calendar days, in deviation from the standard 90 days in article 58 KB Plaatsing.
Such as: the bidder is bound by its offer for 180 days from the limit date for receipt of offers (25 November 2026), i.e. until around late May 2027.
For information requests, all communication must go via the e-Procurement forum, and questions must be submitted at the latest on 18 November 2026.
Questions received after this date will in principle not be handled unless the authority decides otherwise.
Answers and any clarifications or rectifications are published anonymously via e-Procurement, become part of the tender documents and are binding for all bidders.
Further details
The input text is a Belgian public tender (overheidsopdracht) launched by Stad Nieuwpoort for the development, maintenance, further development and hosting of six municipal websites on a Website-as-a-Service platform.
It sets out the applicable Belgian and EU legal framework (notably the Belgian Wet van 17 juni 2016 inzake overheidsopdrachten, and various EU regulations including GDPR and the AI Regulation), so the point of view is clearly that of Belgium within the European Union.
The text details the administrative rules for participation, qualitative selection, gunning criteria, contract execution (SLA, exit, continuity), and practical aspects such as electronic submission via the federal e-Procurement/e-Tendering platform.
As background, the tender is a services contract, awarded via a vereenvoudigde onderhandelingsprocedure met voorafgaande bekendmaking.
Offers must be submitted electronically via e-Procurement by 25 November 2026 before 11:00, and there is no public opening session.
The contract has an initial term of four years with possible extensions up to six years.
The bidder must demonstrate minimum turnover, specific technical and organisational capacities (WaaS model, CMS, WCAG, information security, ISO 27001/9001), and at least five relevant references for local authorities.
The text also specifies extensive obligations on informatieveiligheid, SLA compliance, exit support and continuity of service.
Such as: the contractor must maintain at least civil liability (uitbating and na levering), professional liability and cyber/data risk insurance, with insured amounts proportionate to the assignment; proof (attest) must be provided within thirty days after contract award upon request.
Prices must be expressed in euro.
Solo son vinculantes los pliegos del órgano de contratación. Fecha: 30/10/2026
Táctica
Cuando se adjudicaron contratos en este país y sector, solían llegar 5 ofertas o más. Aquí se presentan muchos: deciden el precio y las referencias. (Según 1480 adjudicaciones concluidas; no es una afirmación sobre este procedimiento.)
Este procedimiento da 34 días entre la publicación y el plazo; lo habitual en este país son 34 (mediana de 3233 procedimientos). Un margen normal para este mercado.
Licitadores extranjeros
En Bélgica · Servicios informáticos, 537 contratos de los últimos 3 años se adjudicaron a empresas extranjeras (de 2133 adjudicaciones registradas) — sobre todo de Francia, Alemania, Luxemburgo.
Cómo presentar una oferta
No se pierda el próximo
Friedrich encuentra licitaciones como esta por usted — cada mañana a las 7:30, cada una revisada por Claude (Anthropic), y aprende de sus respuestas a qué se dedica de verdad su empresa.
Quiero recibirlas