Optional direction and coordination of safety and health of the works of renovation, improvement and adaptation of fourteen playgrounds of medium size of the municipality of San Bartolomé de Tirajana... see section A of the Annex of characteristics of the contract

✓Technical/professional solvency for firms older than five years requires a list of main similar services in the last three years, with an annual volume at least 70% of the estimated value of the relevant lot(s) (57,696.86 € Lot 1; 30,538.22 € Lot 2; 88,235.08 € both), evidenced by certificates identifying object, value, dates, recipient, and nature.

✓For newer firms (<5 years), solvency may be shown via academic/professional titles of the company, management and especially the contract‑responsible personnel plus the binding allocation of required personal and technical resources.

✓Additionally, the bidder must propose at least: a director de obra with appropriate degree, attributions and (where required) professional registration; a competent health and safety coordinator under RD 1627/1997; surveyor resources; and, where necessary, specialist support (structures, installations, accessibility, quality control).

✓Regarding award criteria and weighting, all criteria are automatically quantifiable (no value judgment) and applied per lot.

✓The criteria and maximum points are: 21 points for the experience of the proposed director de obra (3 points per similar work, up to seven services); 10 points for the experience of the proposed health and safety coordinator (2 points per similar coordination, up to five services); 15 points for the allocation of substitute technical staff (7.5 points for a substitute director de obra and 7.5 points for a substitute health and safety coordinator; one person may cover both if fully qualified); 5 points for an environmentally efficient organisation of travel (commitment to group ordinary monitoring visits within a lot into the same day when several parks are active, with certain justified exceptions); and 49 points for the economic offer, applying an inverse proportionality formula Pi = 49 × (Omin / Oi), both amounts without IGIC, rounded to two decimals.

✓Similar experience is strictly defined (e.g. completed works of urbanization, parks, gardens, open public spaces, playgrounds, pedestrian zones or outdoor sports/recreational facilities), and each experience counts once and only if evidenced by certificates from the contracting authority, promoter, owner or recipient clearly identifying the professional, role, object and completion.

✓In case of a tie, preference goes to bidders holding the “Marca de Excelencia Canaria de Eficiencia Energética y Acción Climática” when proving their technical solvency, in accordance with regional climate law.

✓As for risks and special conditions, several contractual obligations are emphasised as essential. There is no bid bond.

✓A final performance guarantee of 5% of the final awarded price per lot (excluding IGIC) is required, in line with LCSP.

✓The contractor must maintain a professional civil liability insurance policy of at least 1,000,000 €, covering professional errors/omissions, third‑party liability and legal defence; this is separate from any policy used to prove economic solvency.

✓Subcontracting is allowed under article 215 LCSP, particularly for topographic work, tests and specialist assistance, but personal professional functions (direction of works, safety coordination, issuing instructions, signing documents) must be carried out directly by the named technical staff; the main contractor remains fully liable.

✓Conditions of execution include: environmental obligations (primarily digital management of documents and communication, efficient resource use) and social obligations (compliance with wages, working conditions, OHS, equality and anti‑harassment).

✓Non‑compliance with such special conditions can trigger specific penalties (1% of lot price per breach) and, if designated as essential, contract termination.

✓Additional penalties include a delay penalty of 0.60 € per 1,000 € of contract price per day of culpable delay, and up to 10% of the lot price for failure to allocate, make available or properly replace committed key or substitute personnel.

✓Bidders’ commitments used as award criteria (e.g. substitution staff, grouped visits) become contractual and their breach can lead to penalties and possibly termination.

✓The bid validity period is 30 days.

✓Payment is made per lot via partial payments (30% at 30% works execution, 30% at 60%, 35% at reception with final documentation, 5% upon favourable final guarantee‑period report), with invoices submitted electronically via FACe.

✓Subcontracting is explicitly allowed but requires prior notification of the portion subcontracted, identity of subcontractor and proof of their eligibility.

✓For example, the online notice’s field “Financiación con fondos de la UE – FEDER” appears, but the detailed approval report states that the expenditure is financed with municipal funds charged to a specific budget line; in case of doubt about financing, the formal approval document and PCAP text should prevail.

✓Likewise, the online criteria table shows each criterion with “Ponderación: 0” but with “Cantidad Mínima/Cantidad Máxima” equal to the points (15, 10, 21, 49, 5); the detailed PPT clarifies the true scoring and formula, so the PPT’s scoring (total 100 points with 51 quality/49 price) is the applicable rule.

✓There is also an apparent tension between the “Plazo de Ejecución 4 meses” shown in the summary and the broader explanation in the PPT that the contract duration is linked to the works contract and effectively extends through the guarantee period; the PPT clarifies that the four months is the initial works‑execution‑linked phase per lot, while the service contract remains in force at least through the minimum one‑year guarantee and up to the maximum period if extended.

❓No explicit question deadline or mandatory site visit is mentioned in the extracted text; therefore, unless stated elsewhere in the PCAP, no obligatory site visit appears to be required, and questions would follow the general rules of LCSP and the platform’s query system.