ZV-GV-26-1115000-412.02 Limpieza de mantenimiento para varias propiedades en Schleswig-Holstein

The scope of the contract is outlined through numerous “Objektinformation Reinigung” sheets for different buildings. Such as for Polizeistation Glückstadt, Finanzamt Elmshorn, PDAFB Eutin, SHIBB Kiel and several other police stations and offices, the documents list: address and type of building, number of floors to be cleaned, presence of entrance dirt-trap zones (“Sauberlaufzone”), access arrangements (e.g. Generalschlüssel, Schlüssel/Transponder, Schlüsselausgabe, „immer geöffnet“), and restrictions (e.g. “Personalausweis ist immer mitzuführen”, “Zutritt nur im Beisein des Nutzers möglich”). They also specify typical cleaning time windows (mostly Monday to Friday, 08:00–16:00; some stations only on Tuesday/Thursday, or Monday/Wednesday/Friday). Further operational details include whether there are usable lifts, cleaning material rooms, tea kitchens for waste collection, central waste areas, water access on each floor, public traffic level (kein/niedrig/mittel), and special features (such as high glass areas in entrance zones or the possible presence of one or more dogs). Exact quantities (e.g. square meters) and contract duration are not contained in the excerpts.

Regarding award criteria and weighting, the input text does not state any evaluation criteria (such as price weighting, quality scores, or social/sustainability criteria) nor how tenders will be compared. Such aspects are typically found in the “Aufforderung zur Angebotsabgabe” or “Bewertungsmatrix”, but they are not part of the material shown here. Therefore, based on the provided text, no information can be given on the award criteria or their weighting.

Risks and special conditions emerge primarily around security and reliability checks for staff deployed in protected state facilities. Such as in the “Anlage zu den Vertragsbedingungen – 10.2 Zuverlässigkeitsüberprüfung” and the “Einwilligung zur Zuverlässigkeitsüberprüfung” plus the “Personalliste zur Zuverlässigkeitsprüfung”, the documents stipulate that for work in state facilities (in the sense of § 181a LVwG, including Landespolizei, courts, prosecutors), unaccompanied access to the premises requires a police reliability check (Zuverlässigkeitsüberprüfung) of each contractor employee deployed on site. After contract award, the contractor must submit a name list of all on-site staff; for each person an individual consent form must be completed and signed, allowing the Landeskriminalamt to check police and prosecutorial information systems. Without consent or in case of negative reliability assessment, employment on site can be prohibited, and the person cannot be used for work in police properties. The documents also clarify that the processing of personal data is limited to the check purpose, may be revoked (with the consequence that employment becomes impossible), and that data and the evaluation result are deleted at the latest six months after the reason for the check ceases. Additionally, access to many buildings is only possible with ID card, and first daily entry involves identity checks by the user; persons without identification are denied entry. No explicit mention of penalties, financial guarantees, rules on subcontracting, bid validity period, question deadline, or mandatory site visits appears in the excerpts.

As for contradictions or corrections within the documents, the provided text mainly consists of consistent object information sheets and legal/organizational annexes. Such as the repeated object sheets for the same building (e.g. FM_100457, FM_100501, FM_101012) show identical data when they reappear, and the rules on reliability checks are aligned between the consent form and the contractual annex. There are no obvious conflicting statements (e.g. differing access rules or cleaning times for the same object) in the given sections. If any contradictions exist, they would likely be in other parts of the tender not shown here. Based on this input, the statements on security checks, access restrictions, and procedural steps for electronic bidding can be treated as applicable and coherent.