Jornadas en gestión de redes IP, Sharepoint, centrales telefónicas, técnicas de sonido y diseño e impresión 3D para Z.O.

✓For newly created companies (less than five years old), solvency can be proven by a responsible declaration describing the technical staff and units available, especially those in charge of quality control.

❓The text does not explicitly mention specific insurance, forms or particular certificates beyond these general solvency documents and the emphasis on teaching experience and certifications of the teaching staff as award criteria.

✓On award criteria and weighting, the conditions of adjudication specify that criteria are evaluated by formula and that there is a plurality of criteria, consistent with art. 159.1 LCSP.

✓Three criteria are listed: (1) Price, weighted at 49 points; (2) “Experiencia docente adicional del personal docente adscrito,” weighted at 30 points; and (3) “Certificaciones adicionales del personal docente,” weighted at 21 points.

❓Thus, price is important but does not reach 50%; qualitative aspects relating to the teaching staff’s experience and certifications jointly account for 51% of the score.

✓Subcontracting is allowed (“Subcontratación permitida”), and invoices must be electronic, whereas no electronic purchase order or payment system will be used.

✓Regarding risks and special conditions, the documents impose a definitive performance guarantee of 5% of the contract price, as stated under “Garantía requerida definitiva: 5%”.

✓There are also “condiciones especiales de ejecución de contrato” of a social nature, such as the obligation for the contractor to comply with ILO Conventions Nos. 111 (non-discrimination in employment and occupation) and 100 (equal remuneration).

❓No explicit penalties, validity period of offers, or mandatory site visit are described in the extracted text, nor is there a specific question deadline beyond the general bid submission deadline (18/11/2026 at 10:30) via PLACSP; such details may be contained in the Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas Particulares or Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas, which are referenced but not reproduced here.

✓The existence of a “Certificado de falta de medios personales propios” from the Army’s Personnel Command confirms the need to outsource the service due to insufficient internal staff, reducing the risk of internal competition but underscoring the firm need for the contract.

✓As to contradictions or corrections within the documents, the main figures appear coherent: all resolution, memoria justificativa and oficio de inicio reiterate the same contract object, total budget (84.000 EUR VAT included), and estimated value (69.421,49 EUR net), and confirm the open simplified procedure with multiple criteria.

✓The lot breakdown (15.000 + 20.000 + 14.000 + 10.000 + 25.000 EUR) sums correctly to the overall 84.000 EUR.

✓The location and execution period are consistently described as the RT22 in Pozuelo de Alarcón, Madrid, with 10 days of execution until 1 December 2026.

❓The only minor textual variation is in the description of the type of offer (“documentación administrativa y criterios cuantificables automáticamente” vs “documentación administrativa y proposición técnica y económica”), which refer to the same single-envelope submission structure; in practice, the more detailed pliego should prevail.

✓No explicit errata or conflicting requirements (for example different deadlines, different guarantees, or incompatible solvency thresholds) are visible in the provided excerpts, so the statements in the official announcement and tender documents (Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas and Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas) are presumed to be the applicable ones.