OC-M-26003; 54.807/26 Corrección de los niveles sonoros existentes de la margen derecha A-6 entre los P.K.13+000 Y 13+500 (Md). Madrid

Such as regarding what the bidder must submit and minimum requirements, the offer is split into three “sobres”: Sobre 1 (Administrativo – documentación administrativa), Sobre 2 (Técnico – oferta técnica evaluable mediante juicio de valor), and Sobre 3 (Económico – oferta económica evaluable mediante fórmulas). The text explicitly requires company classification: B2‑3 (de hormigón armado, >360,000 € and ≤840,000 €), B4‑2 (metálicos, >150,000 € and ≤360,000 €), and K2‑2 (sondeos, inyecciones y pilotajes, >150,000 € and ≤360,000 €). It also states that bidders must accredit “capacidad de obrar” under Chapter II, Title II of Law 9/2017 on Public Sector Contracts. Detailed forms (e.g. DEUC), turnover, insurance and specific references are not spelled out in the excerpt, but are indicated as contained in the “Pliego Cláusulas Administrativas”, “Pliego Prescripciones Técnicas”, “Instrucciones DEUC.pdf” and a “Nota aclaratoria PCAP obras clausula 23_vi.pdf”, which are the binding sources for exact documentation and qualification conditions.

Such as on the scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the object is “Corrección de los niveles sonoros existentes de la margen derecha A‑6 entre los P.K. 13+000 y 13+500 (Md). Madrid”, i.e. noise mitigation works along the right margin of the A‑6 motorway between kilometre points 13+000 and 13+500 in Madrid. The estimated value is 1,735,215.96 €; the “presupuesto base de licitación” is 2,099,611.31 € (1,735,215.96 € before taxes). Execution period is 25 months. Place of execution is the Comunidad de Madrid (territorial code ES3, Spain). The offer submission deadline is 14‑12‑2026 at 19:00; administrative opening (Sobre 1) is on 16‑12‑2026 at 10:00; technical opening (Sobre 2, juicio de valor) on 13‑01‑2027 at 10:00; economic opening (Sobre 3) on 03‑02‑2027 at 10:00. Openings are telematic at Paseo de la Castellana 67, Madrid, and are private acts.

Such as for award criteria and weighting, the announcement lists: (a) criteria evaluable via formulas – “Gastos de Ensayo: Otros” with “Subtipo Criterio: 6”, and “Precio: Precio” with “Subtipo Criterio: 54”; (b) criteria evaluable via judgment of value – “Oferta técnica: Otros” with “Subtipo Criterio: 40”. Each shows “Cantidad mínima” equal to its number (6, 54, 40) and “Cantidad máxima” but the displayed “Ponderación” fields show 0, which likely reflects a data export issue rather than actual zero weight. The real scoring and weighting must be taken from the PCAP and any clarifying note (especially “Nota aclaratoria PCAP obras clausula 23_vi.pdf”), which prevail over the platform listing if different.

Such as for risks and special conditions, the text sets a “Garantía definitiva” of 5% and a “Garantía complementaria” of 5%, both on the contract amount, implying a total potential 10% guarantee exposure depending on the case. It mentions a maximum advertising cost of 3,000 €. It confirms use of electronic purchase order, electronic invoice and electronic payment. Subcontracting is expressly permitted (without further limits stated in the excerpt; detailed caps and obligations must be checked in the PCAP and Law 9/2017). Offer validity is 4 months. Programs of financing: no EU funds. Penalties, detailed guarantees enforcement mechanisms, and any site-visit or formal questions deadline are not spelled out in this snippet; those will be governed by the PCAP, PPT and the referenced clarificatory note. Questions and access to pliegos are managed by Dirección General de Carreteras (contact at Paseo de la Castellana 67 – despacho B750; email [email protected]; phone and fax numbers provided).

Such as for contradictions or corrections, the text repeatedly cross-references “Nota aclaratoria PCAP obras clausula 23_vi.pdf”, indicating there has been at least one formal clarification/correction to clause 23 of the Administrative Clauses (PCAP). Where there are discrepancies between the platform summary (announcement) and the PCAP/PPT, Spanish practice and the text itself make clear that the binding statements are: first, the PCAP and PPT as amended by the “nota aclaratoria”; second, the DEUC instructions; and only then the summary fields shown on PLACSP. Repeated duplications of information (e.g. two nearly identical entries with different timestamp IDs) are technical artifacts of publication, not substantive contradictions; in case of doubt, bidders should rely on the latest timestamped version of the pliegos and the clarificatory note hosted on the Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público.