Servicio de formación para la educación y sensibilización ambiental mediante un Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición.

✓Price (CO1) can have between 0% and 100% of the points, and technical quality criteria (such as the quality of materials, execution, and post‑sale service/guarantees) can have between 0% and 50% of the points, with the constraint that for Annex IV/intellectual services, quality must be at least 51% of the total score.

✓The sample evaluation reports for call‑offs “Nueva Vida Ropa” and “Reparamos Juntos” show a concrete example: price total (CO1) plus four objective criteria—CO2 “talleres ambientales” (up to 15 points), CO3 “buenas prácticas ambientales” (up to 10), CO4 “creación de materiales educativos” (up to 10), and CO5 “tiempo de respuesta” (up to 5)—leading to a maximum of 100 points; in these cases, RECUMADRID obtained 60 points for price and the maximum on all qualitative criteria (total 100), while TALLER CEFORA obtained 19.20 points only on price (total 19.20), and thus the based contracts were awarded to RECUMADRID.

✓As to risks and special conditions, the CCP defines mandatory social and environmental execution conditions for each based contract, such as implementing actions to promote gender equality, prevent sexual harassment, facilitate work‑life balance, foster employment of disadvantaged groups, and adopt environmentally beneficial measures like use of biodegradable products, efficient water management, renewable energy use, recycling and reuse of materials, and use of “flota medioambiental”.

✓Non‑compliance with these special conditions is classified as a “falta grave” and may lead either to contract termination or penalties up to 10% of the contract price (excluding VAT), in line with LCSP article 202.3; additionally, the contractor must annually send documents proving compliance.

✓Other penalities mentioned include, for example: suspension from participation in the SDA for 2–4 months for failure to participate (no offer or inadmissible offer) in based contracts, for defective execution leading to culpable termination, and a 3% penalty of the based contract value per day of delay in execution.

✓Payment terms foresee partial payments against delivery and acceptance of the services; there is no electronic invoicing or electronic payment, but electronic ordering is used.

❓Subcontracting rules, guarantees and question deadlines are not detailed in the extracts, and site visits are not referenced, suggesting they may not be central or are covered elsewhere in the full pliegos.

✓Finally, on contradictions or corrections in the documents, the text explicitly notes a rectification of key dates in an “Enlace al Anuncio Anterior”: where previously the deadline for participation requests and opening were 08/08/2024 and 09/08/2024, they have been corrected to 08/08/2033 and 09/08/2033, respectively, while the system’s end date remains 07/08/2034.

✓It also corrects the DOUE publication date from 08/07/2024 to 09/07/2024 and adds the TED reference URI and timestamp.

❓The corrected announcement with the 2033 dates, combined with the CCP and approval agreements specifying a 10‑year duration from the first homologation, appears to be the currently applicable version; where discrepancies exist, such as between earlier 2024 dates and later 2033 dates, the later rectified notice explicitly states “donde se decía… ahora se dice…”, indicating that the corrected statement supersedes the earlier one.