Establecimiento de un Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición (SDA) para el suministro de impresos de variados modelos.

✓Economical solvency is based on annual business volume in the SDA’s field: a minimum annual turnover not exceeding 60,000 EUR, documented by a responsible declaration covering the last up to three years (with special rules for newly created companies under art. 75 LCSP).

✓Technical/professional solvency requires a list of main similar supplies over, at most, the last three years, with amounts, dates and clients, and a minimum value of 70 % of the average annual volume, fixed at 56,000 EUR.

✓This can be evidenced by certificates from competent bodies or, failing that, a responsible declaration with supporting documents.

✓There is also a commitment requirement to assign sufficient personal and material means to the SDA’s execution.

✓Examples of businesses declined from adhesion show practical application of these rules (e.g. rejection for lacking technical and economic solvency or pending proof of tax/social security compliance).

✓Such as in the award criteria and weighting, the SDA documentation indicates that specific contracts will be awarded to the bidder presenting the best offer according to criteria previously announced and later detailed in each invitation (art. 226.4 LCSP).

✓The general criteria for all categories are: (1) offer price (economic) with a weighting range of minimum 50 points, maximum 90 points; (2) delivery time for the supply, weighted between 10 and 40 points; and (3) quality/improvements and adaptation to the technical specifications, weighted between 0 and 50 points.

✓The Platform entry further refines this into formula-based criteria with defined minimum and maximum scores (e.g. price, delivery time, and quality as separate evaluable criteria).

✓These ranges allow the contracting authority to tailor the exact formulas and point allocation in each specific tender while remaining within the announced bands.

✓Such as in the identified risks, penalties, guarantees and subcontracting rules, the SDA sets out that no provisional guarantee is required, and no general definitive guarantee is demanded just to join the SDA.

✓However, for specific contracts, the invitation may require a definitive guarantee equal to 5 % of the contract award amount (excluding VAT), especially where appropriate for consumable goods deliveries under art. 107.2 LCSP.

✓There is a detailed regime of special execution conditions, notably the environmental requirement that packaging must have minimal ecological impact, proven by labelling and a signed declaration at the start of each specific contract; non-compliance with this is classified as a grave breach.

✓Penalties are structured as general limits (no more than 10 % of the SDA price per penalty, nor more than 50 % total) and specific monetary percentages for each breach category: mild infringements 2 % of the specific contract price, up to 2 % of the SDA; grave infringements 5 %, up to 5 %; very grave infringements 10 %, up to 10 %.

✓Mild, grave and very grave infringements are defined both in general SDA terms (e.g. failures to supply on time, technical condition breaches, secrecy breaches, non‑compliance with environmental and data protection obligations) and in more operational terms (e.g. delays in submitting documentation, faults in billing, repeated defects in information delivery, improper staff incidents, manifestly defective supply).

✓Commission of two very grave breaches can lead to termination of the SDA for the contractor, with possible confiscation of any guarantees and a duty to indemnify damages.

✓Subcontracting is permitted under art. 215 LCSP, but bidders must state in their offer the part to be subcontracted, its value, and the subcontractor’s name or profile based on their solvency conditions.

✓Such as in the contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text shows parallel and overlapping descriptions rather than outright conflicts.

✓For example, the SDA duration is consistently set at 3 years plus up to 2 annual extensions (maximum 5 years) across the technical necessity report, the legal report and the Platform notice.

❓Penalty levels and breach classifications appear twice, once in a more general SDA context and once in a more operational context, but the numeric ranges (2 %, 5 %, 10 %) and the link to art. 192 and 194 LCSP coincide; where there are dual classifications (e.g. secrecy breach or defective supply as grave or very grave), the documents themselves resolve this by referring to art. 29.3 LRJSP criteria and by stating that the “very grave” qualification applies when obligations are essential (e.g.

❓EU/Spanish data protection compliance under art. 211 LCSP).