Establecimiento de Sistema Dinámico de adquisición para el suministro de recambios de vehículos.

✓Before homologation in the SDA, selected bidders must also provide samples (“muestras”).

✓For contracts específicos, the offer must include an economic proposal using Anexo I (Solicitud de oferta), submitted as a completed PDF template.

✓Award criteria are mainly price-based and evaluated by formulas.

✓Such as set out in the CCP, for contratos específicos, “precio o coste de las prestaciones” can represent between 0 % and 100 % of total points, and other quality-related criteria (materials quality, execution quality, after‑sales service/guarantees) may also be valued, with a share between 0 % and 50 % depending on each specific contract.

✓In the PCSP configuration, a single formula-based criterion (“Otros”, subtipo 100) is given weighting 100.

✓In practice, examples in the specific awards show price expressed as a percentage discount on product families (e.g. 10 % discount offered by AEBI SCHMIDT IBERICA, S.A.).

✓When there is only one admissible bidder, the documentation stresses that what is assessed is compliance with requirements rather than comparative economic advantage.

✓Risks and special conditions focus on mandatory social and environmental execution conditions, civil liability insurance, penalties and possible suspension from the SDA.

✓Such as described in section 14 of the CCP, the contractor must comply with at least one social and one environmental condition from an enumerated list (e.g. equality measures, anti-harassment measures, work-life balance, support for persons with disabilities; minimization of resource consumption, waste reduction, energy efficiency, emission reduction, use of eco‑products).

✓Non-compliance is treated as a “falta grave” and can lead to contract resolution or penalties up to 10 % of the contract price (without VAT).

✓Penalties also include suspension from participation in the SDA for 2–4 months for non-participation (no offer or defective offer) or for culpable defective execution of a specific contract; delay penalties are specified as a percentage of the specific contract per day of delay.

✓There is an obligation to hold civil liability insurance, with a minimum indemnity limit of 100,000 EUR and, in one passage, an indication that insurance should be for at least twice the estimated contract value per claim/year, though one check-box configuration (“NO”) suggests that this higher threshold may not ultimately be imposed.

✓Factoring is usually by single payment upon delivery and acceptance.

✓Data protection conditions are noted but, in this case, boxes for personal data processing and data transfer are marked “No”.

❓Subcontracting is not specifically regulated in the extracted text; instead, the emphasis is on direct compliance and solvency of the bidder.

✓On contradictions and corrections, the documents include several “Enlace al anuncio anterior / Donde se decía… ahora se dice…” notices.

✓Such as indicated, initial texts mentioning “Valor estimado 500.000 EUR” were later corrected to 300.000 EUR, while the base tender budget remained 300.000 EUR.

✓Dates for the deadline for submission of requests to participate and for opening of offers were also corrected (e.g. from 28/07/2025 to 05/02/2025).

⚠Where there is a conflict between earlier and later announcements, the corrected entries in the most recent notices and in the CCP/Acuerdo de Validación apply, so bidders should rely on: estimated value 300,000 EUR; restricted procedure; SDA duration 10 years from first homologation; period of validity until 26/06/2035; minimum of 5 candidates; no electronic auction; use of catalogues electrónicos; deadlines and opening dates as corrected in the February 2026 notices and linked TED notice 416098‑2025.