Establecimiento de sistema dinámico de adquisición para el servicio de mantenimientos preventivos y correctivos de talleres para vehículos (ligeros, pesados y otros).

✓As for scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the SDA covers, such as stated in the announcement, the establishment of a system for maintenance services (preventive and corrective) of vehicle workshops for all LYMA vehicles, with a total estimated value and base budget of 300,000 EUR, over ten years.

✓The place of performance is Getafe (Madrid), specifically LYMA’s facilities at Calle Helena Rubinstein, Polígono Industrial El Lomo, and potentially external workshops (“fuera de las instalaciones de LYMA”).

✓The system is valid until 17/02/2035, with requests to participate accepted until 17/02/2025 and opening of administrative documentation on 18/02/2025.

✓Award criteria and weighting are described both in the general CCP and in the specific evaluation reports.

✓Such as in section 8 “Criterios de adjudicación de los contratos basados”, price or cost of services (CO1) is a key criterion, with a weighting between 0% and 100% depending on the specific contract, while other quality-related criteria (CO2, CO3) measure aspects like discount on parts (% over manufacturer catalog), quality of materials, execution, after-sales service, and service improvements (vehicle substitution, pick‑up and delivery at LYMA facilities).

✓In the specific evaluation for contract 6C, CO1, CO2 and CO3 are scored numerically (e.g.

✓NEUMÁTICOS SOLEDAD gets 57.78 points for CO1, 30 for CO2, 0 for CO3, total 87.78, slightly above BASSAM’s 87.5).

✓In the corrective lots, CO1 appears as hourly price, CO2 as % discount on parts (e.g. 20.10% for TALLERES MIGUEL ÁNGEL GARCÍA‑2 vs 20% for NEUMÁTICOS SOLEDAD), and CO3 as service improvement (e.g.

❓“Sí” for pick‑up and delivery at LYMA installations), leading to award to the economically most advantageous tender according to the CCP’s formulas (although the exact numeric weighting per CO1–CO3 is not reproduced, the reports refer to “Conforme al Cuadro de Condiciones Particulares del Pliego de Condiciones Administrativas”).

✓Risks and special conditions are addressed, such as in section 9 and 11 of the CCP.

✓Special execution conditions include a mandatory civil liability insurance for based contracts, with a minimum indemnity limit of 100,000 EUR (and a more general rule that insurance per professional risks should be at least twice the estimated value of the contract per claim/year, although the checkboxes show “Seguro de responsabilidad civil: Sí / No” with “No” ticked for that second requirement in the extract).

✓Additionally, contractors must comply with at least one social and one environmental execution condition from a list (e.g. actions to promote gender equality, prevent sexual harassment, support work–life balance, promote employment of disabled or at‑risk persons; and environmental measures like resource minimization, waste reduction, energy efficiency, renewable energy use, reduction of GHG emissions, environmental plans, water management, recycled materials, biodegradable products, eco‑labels, availability of “flota medioambiental”).

✓Non‑compliance with these special conditions is deemed a serious breach that may lead to contract termination or penalties up to 10% of the contract price (art. 202.3 LCSP).

✓Penalties for SDA participants include suspension from participating in the system for 2–4 months if they fail to submit offers or submit inadmissible offers to based contracts, or if a based contract is terminated for culpable defective performance; and a delay penalty of 3% of the based contract per day of delay in execution.

✓Payments are made via partial payments upon satisfactory delivery and acceptance of services.

✓The system foresees use of electronic ordering but not electronic invoicing or payment.

⚠Concerning contradictions or corrections, the documents show some internal clarifications rather than strong contradictions.

✓Such as the multiple homologation agreements (03‑placsp‑8, 05‑placsp‑10, 09‑placsp‑14) correct and update the list of homologated suppliers, acknowledging an “error involuntario” where publication of updated homologation was missing before awarding specific contracts; the subsequent agreements admit extra suppliers (COCENTRO, TDMED POWER SYSTEMS, TALLERES MIGUEL ÁNGEL GARCÍA‑2, BASSAM EZALDIN ALSEKMANI) and “confirman” the complete list of homologated bidders at each stage.

✓Where there could seem to be a contradiction (e.g.

✓Rolece requirement: the standard CCP template shows the “Sí” option, but the specific SDA marks “No” and cites art. 159.4.a LCSP to justify not requiring registration), the operative statement is the one explicitly ticked and justified in the CCP: ROLECE is not required.

⚠Likewise, the contract type appears as “Servicio” in the main SDA documentation, while specific lots’ evaluation forms label them as “Tipo de contrato: Suministros”, but the controlling classification is the SDA approval (Tipo de contrato: Servicio) and LCSP’s reference to service contracts for vehicle maintenance.