Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición para servicios del Departamento de Comunicación del Área de Transición Ecológica

❓The place of performance is Badajoz (subentity ES431, Spain), and the SDA execution period runs from 11/12/2024 to 09/12/2027, with a possible single 12‑month extension (maximum prórroga 12 months), meaning a potential total duration of 48 months.

✓The system is dynamic: the “periodo de vigencia del sistema dinámico” ends 09/12/2027, and operators can be admitted over time; the deadline for initial requests to participate was 10/12/2024 at 14:00, with pliegos obtainable until the same deadline.

✓Lists of admitted operators per lot (e.g.

✓Legola, AOSSA, Wazo, DION EVENTOS, BURGOS BERZOSA, UAS, Abstracto, AVENTUREX, etc.) show how participation evolves via sessions of the Mesa de Contratación.

✓On award criteria and weighting, the texts give both the general structure and specific formulas.

✓For each derived contract within the SDA, there are “criterios de adjudicación posibles” including: price (oferta económica) with 50% weighting; time of execution (plazo de ejecución) with 10%; “bolsa de horas” (an annual free‑of‑charge hours pool) with 5%; and additional personnel/material resources with 5%; plus technical criteria subject to qualitative judgement with 30% weighting (calidad técnica/diseño y creatividad, plan de trabajo, equipo, medios técnicos y materiales, cronograma y coordinación).

✓For the price, they propose a mathematical formula P = PMax * (1 – (PBJ – PBO) / 50), where price reductions are expressed as a percentage of discount, and the lowest price defines PBJ.

✓For the execution period, another formula is given (Pn = PMax – [PMax x (PEn – PEmin)/(PEmáx – PEmin)]) with an “umbral de saciedad” based on 0.90 times the average offered execution period, after which maximum points are assigned.

✓For the annual hours pool and resources, specific scoring modules “____ puntos por cada módulo de ____ horas” and “por cada [element] más adscrito” are indicated but left blank in the draft form, to be set in each PPT.

✓Overall, the award is by “varios criterios”, not electronic auction, and all operators that meet solvency are eligible to be invited; the notice mentions a planned number of operators (5) but clarifies that all meeting solvency conditions are admitted.

✓As for risks and special conditions (penalties, guarantees, subcontracting, validity period, question deadlines, site visits), the excerpts explicitly mention: validity of the offer is 2 months (“Plazo de Validez de la Oferta 2 Mes(es)”); invoices must be electronic (“Se aceptará factura electrónica”), and there is no electronic ordering or payment system used; the process does not use electronic auction (“Subasta electrónica: No”), and no EU fund co‑financing.

❓Question deadlines and site visits are not explicitly stated, though the general deadlines for obtaining documents and submitting participation requests are given, and the standard conflict‑of‑interest and anti‑corruption clauses imply obligations on confidentiality and impartiality.

❓Penalties, performance guarantees, subcontracting limits, or other special conditions would normally be in the PCAP/PPT, which the resolution explicitly approves, but their contents are not detailed in the provided text.

✓However, there is strong emphasis on conflict‑of‑interest management: members of the Mesa repeatedly declare they know and apply article 61.3 of the EU Financial Regulation, articles 64 and 71.1.g LCSP, and article 23 on abstention in Ley 40/2015.

✓They formally state they have no conflicts, will immediately declare any that arise, will cease participation if a conflict appears, and will treat all information as confidential, with false declarations triggering disciplinary, administrative and judicial consequences.

❓Concerning contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text includes, such as, a specific “error material” correction: in the acta of 16 January 2025, the categories for INICIATIVA FORMACIÓN, LUIS FANO and ABSTRACTO PRODUCCIONES were incorrectly recorded (Iniciativa Formación 2 y 3; Luis Fano 2,3 y 4; Abstracto Producciones 2); a subsequent certificate dated 07 February 2025 corrects this to Iniciativa Formación 4; Luis Fano 2,3; Abstracto Producciones 2,3 y 4. The correction explicitly states that where it said X, it must say Y, so the later acta (07‑02‑2025, code 8fe912a92e711096) prevails for category allocation.

✓There are also two versions of the list of admitted operators per lot (one with AOSSA, Legola, Wazo, DION EVENTOS for lot 1 and another including BURGOS BERZOSA and AVENTUREX later), reflecting that admission lists are updated over time rather than contradictory.

❓Additionally, multiple certificates of the Mesa (13‑12‑2024, 16‑01‑2025, 07‑02‑2025, 13‑02‑2026, 26‑02‑2026, 26‑03‑2026) refer to the same expediente 507/24, but their chronological nature and explicit “una vez subsanadas las solicitudes” wording show that newer decisions (e.g. acceptance of DION EVENTOS, WILDLIFE ECODESIGN, ADAPTARE, MACHACO, BURGOS BERZOSA, WAZO, UAS, BEGREEN, AVENTUREX, SYNOPSIS 103) either complement or correct the earlier ones; thus, in case of divergence, the most recent certified acta with its corresponding verification code and date is the applicable statement.