Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición para la contratación del suministro de reactivos necesarios para el tratamiento del agua potable en EMASESA

✓The place of performance is EMASESA’s facilities in Sevilla (postal address Escuelas Pías 1, 41003 Sevilla; territorial code ES618), i.e. within Spain.

✓Such as concerning award criteria, weighting, and the particularity of a dynamic purchasing system, the documents repeatedly stress that **for the establishment of the SDA there are no award criteria, only selection criteria** (capacity and solvency).

✓The section on “Condiciones de adjudicación” notes that criteria evaluable by formulas do **not apply** for SDA establishment, although it generically mentions “Precio – 100” as a formula-based criterion; this is explicitly clarified as “No aplica para el establecimiento del SDA”.

✓The **Memoria justificativa** further clarifies that “No procede porque no hay criterios de adjudicación, solo de selección”, and that the concrete **award criteria (including price and any qualitative criteria)** will be defined later in each **specific contract derived from the SDA**.

✓The SDA is open-ended in terms of the number of admitted candidates, with no cap on the number of suppliers per lot.

✓The validity period of the initial offers for SDA admission is **6 months**.

❓Such as in relation to risks and special conditions, the text mentions several execution conditions and procedural elements but leaves detailed penalties and guarantees to the PCAP/PPT.

✓There is **no price revision formula**, and the **Directive on Clean Vehicles does not apply**.

✓Payment conditions are indicated as “No aplica” at this stage, meaning they are presumably defined in derived contracts. **Electronic invoicing is accepted**.

✓There are **environmental and social special conditions of execution** referenced in section 28 of Annex 1 PCAP. **Subcontracting is allowed** (the Memoria marks “Sí se admite”); any restrictions will be set out in the specific contracts under the SDA.

✓The process is fully **electronic via PLACSP**, not via electronic auction; it is subject to the **GPA (Acuerdo sobre Contratación Pública)** and **EU funding does not apply**.

✓As for timing and questions/appeals, offers for SDA admission can be submitted up to **30/01/2031 at 14:00**, with envelopes opened as new entities apply; resources (appeals) can be presented to **TARCAS** until **21/01/2026 at 23:59**.

❓Site visit obligations are not mentioned in the extracted text.

✓Such as dealing with contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text records an **annulment of both the original tender notice and the initial “Documento de Pliegos”** published on 30-12-2025 and 02-01-2026, respectively.

✓The reason given is an **error in configuration on the platform**, namely that the procedure was set up as an **open procedure** when it should be a **restricted procedure for establishing a dynamic purchasing system**.

✓However, many data fields (including in the approval agreement and on PLACSP) still show “Procedimiento Abierto / Tramitación Ordinaria”, which conflicts with the **Memoria justificativa**, where the “procedimiento de contratación” is explicitly marked as **Restringido**.

✓The governing statement for the nature of the procedure is therefore the correction: it is a **restricted procedure to establish an SDA**, and the “open” wording in the annulled announcements is superseded.

✓Likewise, while one part of the text generically lists a price criterion with 100% weighting, all clarified passages state that **no award criteria apply at the SDA establishment stage**, and that real adjudication criteria will be defined in future specific contracts, so the latter clarification prevails.