Contratación de suministros necesarios demandados por el Ayuntamiento de Galapagar

✓Regarding the award criteria and their weighting, the text shows both the logic of the DPS and concrete examples.

✓In the dynamic system, companies are approved by categories after accrediting documentation and solvency, and then are invited to derivative purchases in those categories.

✓In derived purchases, the main criterion is price, with economic scores calculated on the basis of the cancellation of tenders (for example, in the acquisition of folios: LINEA PAPEL’s bid for €322 compared to COPYCOP’s €333, with tender reductions of 10.06 % and 6.98 %, resulting in scores of 100.00 and 96.70 points respectively).

✓In other cases, such as purchases of office chairs or software licenses, only one offer is submitted and 100 points are assigned to it, as it is unique and meets the award criteria.

✓Although the text does not detail complete formulas or weightings between price and other criteria, it appears that the price (supply point) is the determining criterion and that “improvements” could have weight, although in the tables examined they appear without numerical values.

❓In relation to risks and special conditions, the text provides some references but without developing specific penalty clauses.

✓Acceptance of e-invoicing is mentioned as a condition of execution.

✓The ‘Guarantee Model’ is also cited as Annex VI in the specifications, which indicates the possible requirement for guarantees, although the fragments do not specify amounts or types of guarantee or penalties.

❓There is no explicit reference to penalties for delays or to the subcontracting regime in the extracts, although by application of Law 9/2017 it could be that they were in the complete PCAP.

✓The text does set strict deadlines: 10 days to send proposals after invitation in the case of folios; 3 working days to correct documentary defects in accordance with the table in the minutes; 7 days for delivery of supplies after notification of the award.

❓There is no mention of visits to facilities or specific deadlines for questions from tenderers, or periods of validity of tenders, although it can be understood that they are governed by the provisions of the administrative specifications (PCAP) and invitations, not reproduced in full here.

✓Finally, regarding contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text includes several “links to the previous announcement” where official amendments are made, indicating which wording prevails.

✓For example, in a notice the date “28/12/2029” is corrected and replaced by “23/05/2025”; the words “About 1” now read “1 Call”; Additional information on the preparation of the tender (Administrative Accession Documentation, CPV included, etc.) is added.

✓It is also stated that CPV classification 03110000 (Cultivation, commercial gardening and horticulture products) is added to the DPS notices.

✓These amendment notes with time stamp FNMT-RCM indicate that the corrected versions of the notice and the specifications are the ones that apply.

✓Likewise, the minutes of the recruitment table indicate provisional exclusions of companies or requirements to rectify when the request to participate does not coincide with the CPV of the requested categories (for example, CARPIL, S.A., or JOMICON 99, S.L. and others), making it clear that consistency between the CPV category, the solvency provided and the application for membership prevails, and that, until the companies correct their admission, they are in a provisional situation.