Suministro de calzado para LYMA mediante el establecimiento de un sistema dinámico de adquisición.

✓The overall term of the SDA is 10 years: from 05/02/2024 to 01/02/2033, with “Duración 10 años” starting from the date of first homologation.

✓The place of performance is Getafe (Madrid), specifically the address Calle Helena Rubinstein 6, Polígono Industrial El Lomo.

✓The SDA is a restricted procedure; suppliers are first “homologated” (admitted) and then invited to compete for specific contracts (e.g.

✓S1_2025, B8_2025, B10, B11).

✓Such as award criteria and weighting, the framework CCP stipulates that contract‑based criteria are evaluable by formula, with price as a core criterion.

✓For contracts based under the SDA, the CCP states that price/cost of the prestations will have between 0% and 100% of the total score, and additional quality‑related criteria (materials quality, execution quality, after‑sales service and guarantees, reduction of delivery times) may be included, with reduction of delivery times weighted between 0% and 50%.

✓ANATOMICOS MADRID excluded for not covering sizes 35–36 and not guaranteeing 72‑hour delivery; the award then goes to JOYSA as next best).

✓Such as risks and special conditions, the CCP defines special social and environmental execution conditions: social actions of awareness and training for staff involved in execution, and environmental commitments to maintain or improve environmental parameters affected by the contract.

✓Penalties are clearly set: not submitting offers to contracts based or submitting defective offers that prevent admission may lead to suspension from participation in the SDA for two months; defective execution causing culpable termination similarly can trigger a two‑month suspension; delay in execution is penalized at 3% of the value of the specific contract per day of delay.

✓Contract‑based invoicing is monthly, based on orders made in the month.

✓Use of electronic ordering is mandatory (“pedido electrónico: Sí”), while electronic invoicing and payment are not used.

❓There is no mention of financial guarantees or performance bonds in the excerpts, nor any explicit rules on subcontracting, question deadlines, or mandatory site visits; these would, if applicable, be in the parts of the CCP not reproduced here.

✓Such as contradictions or corrections within the documents, the dynamic nature of the SDA means there are multiple, separate award reports over time.

✓This can look contradictory (e.g.

✓ANATOMICOS MADRID is adjudicatario in B8_2025 in one report, but in another report under a different specific contract within the same SDA they are excluded due to failure to provide certain sizes and delivery deadlines; similarly, JOYSA is best‑scoring bidder in several evaluations, while other contracts are awarded to IMPORTACIONES INDUSTRIALES or ITURRI).

⚠These are not internal contradictions but reflect different specific contracts with their own competition and outcomes, all under the same SDA reference 8.2024.

✓When an apparent conflict arises (such as ANATOMICOS MADRID initially scoring 100 points but later being excluded for not meeting technical requirements), the later clarifying statement in the same report applies: the evaluation section is followed by a clarification explaining technical non‑compliance, exclusion, and re‑award to the next highest‑scoring bidder (JOYSA).

❓Overall, the CCP and LCSP are the governing documents; where a summary PCSP notice and CCP differ, the detailed CCP (Cuadro de Condiciones Particulares) is the binding reference for criteria and conditions.