Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición para suministros del Área de Sostenibilidad Ambiental, Energía y Territorio Verde

✓On the scope of the contract and operational details, the SDA covers the periodic and recurrent acquisition of various materials needed by the sustainability area, with categories valued individually: such as, 80,000 € (fitosanitarios), 200,000 € (plant materials), 280,000 € (containers/cepellones), 120,000 € (merchandising), 80,000 € (ferretería and utillaje), 80,000 € (riego), totalling 840,000 €.

✓The SDA is structured in lots corresponding to these six categories, and admitted operators per lot are listed (e.g.

✓Maj Agroquímicos, Natural Systems Agrotech S.L., NOVASERVICE UTILITIES SL in Category 1; MYC‑5, Severiano Agrocomercial, etc. in others).

✓The performance location is Badajoz; procurement is handled by the Área de Economía Sostenible, Contratación Estratégica y Patrimonio, with the presidency delegating competence to the relevant diputada/diputado.

✓Electronic orders are not used; electronic invoicing is accepted; electronic payment is not used.

✓The award criteria and weighting are clearly formula‑based and identical across categories.

✓For each derived contract, quantifiable criteria include: price (70 points per category), delivery time (15 points) and global commercial guarantee of products (15 points), adding up to 100 points per category.

✓For price, such as, the formula P = Pmax * (1 – (PBJ – PBO) / 50) is applied, where PB is calculated as ((Precio Licitación – Precio Ofertado) * 100 / Precio Licitación), and the bidder whose price equals the tender price receives 0 points.

✓Delivery time is valued via Pn = Pmax – [Pmax x (PEn – PEmin) / (PEmáx – PEmin)], with an “umbral de saciedad” (satiation threshold) defined as US = 0.90 * PE medio; offers above this threshold are capped at the threshold for calculation and receive maximum points on this criterion.

✓Similarly, for global product guarantee, the formula Pn = Pmax – [Pmax x (Tmax – Tn) / (Tmáx – Tmin)] is used, with a satiation threshold US = 1.25 x Tmedio; guarantees exceeding this threshold are capped but grant maximum points.

✓These criteria are “criterios evaluables mediante aplicación de fórmulas”, applied per contract derived from the SDA and per category.

✓Regarding risks and special conditions, the texts emphasize compliance with environmental execution considerations (“Consideraciones de tipo medioambiental – Según pliego (lotes 1–6)”) as special conditions of performance.

✓Subcontracting is permitted (as indicated in the tender summary), though detailed limits must be checked in the pliegos.

✓The validity period of offers is set at two months (“Plazo de Validez de la Oferta 2 Mes(es)”).

✓The SDA does not use electronic auctions (“Subasta electrónica: No”), and there is no EU funding.

❓A key risk relates to professional indemnity insurance: bidders must commit to a policy at least equal to the estimated value of each derived contract and maintain coverage throughout execution, with non‑compliance likely triggering contractual consequences under the LCSP and specific pliegos (e.g. possible penalties or loss of award).

❓There is no explicit mention of a mandatory site visit or a question deadline in the provided extracts; questions and remedies follow the LCSP (“Presentación de recursos… Observaciones: Según pliegos y Ley de Contratos del Sector Público”).

✓The documentation also shows strict rules on conflicts of interest and abstention for members of the Mesa de Contratación, reflecting governance and transparency conditions, but not bidder‑side risks.

✓As for contradictions or corrections within the documents, the main correction concerns the required level of technical solvency.

✓Initially, Clause 15 of the Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas (and the description of the expediente) stated that the annual accumulated amount in the year of greatest execution must be at least 50% of the annual average value of the relevant category.

✓A later resolution dated 17‑04‑2026, signed by the Diputada de Economía Sostenible, identifies this as an error and formally modifies it: it “DEBE DECIR” 40% instead of 50%, aligning with the Formulario I proposal that already uses 40% of the annuality.

✓The resolution rectifies the previous approval, modifies the pliego accordingly and restarts the offer submission period, in line with article 122.1 LCSP and administrative case‑law.

✓Therefore, where there is a discrepancy between 50% and 40% technical solvency in different documents, the corrected requirement (40% of annual average per category, plus certificates of good performance) is the one that applies.