Friedrich & ClementBETA

Soumissionner dans ce pays : portails, délais, seuils →

Dossier N° 2027 R3 047 Relatif un accord-cadre pluriannuel (4 ans) de fournitures pour l’acquisition et le continuation des licences «GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On-Premise » au profit de la Direction de l’information policière et des moyens ICT

BEBelgique · Bruxelles

Votre chemin vers le dépôt

  1. Échéance : 19 novembre à 11:00 — encore 18 jours.
  2. Le dépôt se fait sur BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — pas ici, pas par e-mail. ↗
  3. Offre et justificatifs en : français, néerlandais.
  4. Réunissez vos justificatifs — utilisez l'analyse d'éligibilité sur cette page : elle liste les exigences et le chemin d'obtention des attestations connues.
Assemblé automatiquement depuis l'avis et le dossier — sans garantie ; seul le libellé du marché fait foi.

Ce que recherche l'acheteur

De onderhavige overheidsopdracht betreft een meerjarige (4 jaar) raamovereenkomst van leveringen voor de aankoop en verderzetting van “GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On-Premise” licenties ten voordele van de Directie van de politionele informatie en de ICT-middelen. De overeenkomst bestaat uit één enkel perceel, met één post: Post 1: GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On-Premise licentie

Description telle que publiée (FR).

Marché

TypeFournitures
Montant estimémontant non publié
Publié le28 oct. 2026
ProcédureProcédure ouverte
Durée du contrat1 janv. 2027 → 31 déc. 2030
Accord-cadre

Type de prestation

48 · Logiciels & systèmes informatiques
CPV 48000000

Clement Ce que les chiffres disent de cet acheteur

  • 21 % des attributions de cet acheteur sont allées à des entreprises qui avaient déjà gagné ici (142 attributions depuis 2024, réparties sur 111 entreprises). 79 % sont allées à de nouveaux noms.n = 142 attributions depuis 2024
  • En médiane, 3 offres par procédure (93 procédures avec nombre d'offres) ; 25 % se sont terminées avec un seul candidat. Secteur : 2 offres en médiane.n = 93
  • L'attribution s'est faite en médiane à 85 % de la valeur estimée (13 attributions avec estimation et montant) — calculer sur l'estimation est ici le plus souvent trop haut.n = 13
  • Sur 3 procédures aux critères de sélection structurés, cet acheteur a le plus souvent exigé : CA minimal moyen dans le domaine du marché (3 sur 3).n = 3
  • 33 % des attributions sont allées à des entreprises étrangères (142 attributions au pays du titulaire connu). Moyenne du secteur : 34 %.n = 142

À partir des attributions documentées de cet acheteur ; valeurs de comparaison du même secteur et du même pays. Ni prévision, ni conseil juridique. Au 25/10/2026.

Le dossier de consultation en bref

L'essentiel du dossier de consultation, vérifié point par point dans les documents. Pour votre offre, seuls les documents originaux font foi.

Propulsé par eBriefing – technologie linguistique de l'UE. Friedrich est un service indépendant, pas une offre de l'UE.

✓ figure dans les documents · ❓ introuvable dans les documents ou indication générale · Disponible en anglais.

Public Tender Overview – GitLab Enterprise Premium Licences for Belgian Federal Police

The input text concerns a Belgian public procurement procedure launched by the Federal Police for a multi‑annual framework agreement to purchase and continue licences for “GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On‑Premise”.

It is written from the point of view of Belgian law and EU public procurement rules, referring explicitly to Belgium (Federal Police, Belgian legislation, Moniteur belge) and the European Union (EU directives, ESPD/DUME, sanctions against Russia, access of third‑country bidders).

The text explains in detail what bidders must submit and which minimum qualification requirements apply.

Such as: bidders must follow a defined offer structure (Annexe A) with (1) an administrative and price offer including the completed offer form and inventory (Annexe A/1), proof of the signatory’s power to bind the company (coordinated statutes, corporate acts, and, where applicable, mandate or power of attorney); (2) a selection file containing the ESPD/DUME in XML and PDF, and – if no free electronic database exists – recent certificates proving payment of social security contributions and taxes; (3) a price structure (Annexe C) per lot/post; and (4) detailed technical documentation addressing point‑by‑point all clauses in Annex B. If the bidder relies on other entities’ capacity, it must provide, such as, a separate ESPD for each entity plus a signed “déclaration d’engagement” on the mandatory template in Annex E, together with those entities’ corporate documents and mandates.

Offers must be submitted electronically via the Belgian e‑Procurement platform, signed with a qualified electronic signature; email submission is expressly forbidden.

Minimum qualification requirements relate mainly to technical and professional capacity.

Such as: bidders must present a list of principal deliveries of similar supplies (licences useful for software development) executed during the last three civil years plus the current year up to bid opening, stating amount, date and recipient (public or private).

The total value of these deliveries must be at least 300,000 EUR excl.

VAT, proven by a declaration and encoded in Part IV, Section C of the ESPD.

The contracting authority itself will systematically verify social and fiscal compliance (via TELEMARC for Belgian bidders or equivalent foreign databases; if none exists, bidders must attach recent certificates).

There are explicit exclusion grounds tied to EU law and Belgian law, including criminal convictions, tax/social debt, and specific EU sanctions against Russia; by submitting an offer, the bidder implicitly declares it is not covered by the Russian sanctions regime and, if from a non‑EU third country, it must rely on an applicable international treaty and attach a copy.

The scope of the contract is clearly defined.

Afficher les 53 éléments

Such as: it is a four‑year framework agreement (1 January 2027 – 31 December 2030 in principle) for supplies – the purchase and continuation of GitLab Enterprise Premium self‑managed on‑premise licences for the Federal Police’s DevOps platform.

There is one lot and one post only: Post 1 – GitLab Enterprise Premium licence.

Estimated quantities are 250 licences per year in years 1–4; these are minimum quantities, and the authority reserves the right to order annually the quantities it needs, subject to those minima.

The maximum value of the framework is set at 504,000 EUR incl. VAT; once this ceiling is reached, the framework has no further effect, though it may be maintained, modified within legal limits, or terminated.

Delivery times for Post 1 must not exceed seven calendar days from the day after the partial order, and the bidder must describe SLA and support modalities, including response times and incident reporting mechanisms.

Award criteria and their weighting are simple and strictly price‑based.

The evaluated price is computed by multiplying the offered annual price for the single post by 250 licences (minimum quantity) x 4 years.

Prices must be in EUR (two decimals max), exclusive of VAT, but include all taxes and charges (including recycling contributions) and all costs necessary to meet the technical specifications: packaging, transport, insurance, customs, installation, commissioning, documentation, bug fixing, updates, new versions, online training resources, etc. Bidders may choose either fixed prices for the entire duration or a price‑revision formula (specified Agoria wage index formula or a bidder‑proposed formula complying with the general accounting clause in Annex D); in all cases, first‑year prices are firm.

The authority reserves broad rights to verify prices, demand detailed cost structures, and conduct on‑site and accounting controls at the bidder’s and subcontractors’ premises.

Risks and special conditions feature prominently.

Such as: a performance bond (cautionnement) of 5% of the estimated contract value excl.

VAT is required, to be constituted by one of the methods foreseen by AR2 (cash via e‑DEPO, act of joint guarantee through an approved financial institution deposited at the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, or bank/insurance guarantee sent to the contracting service).

There are detailed clauses on price revision, tax changes, possible suspension of advances if the contractor breaches obligations, and various modification scenarios (complementary supplies/services, unforeseeable events for either party) with caps of 50% of the initial value per modification.

Subcontracting is allowed but tightly regulated: the bidder must indicate in the offer the share to be subcontracted and identity of proposed subcontractors, notify any changes before performance, and accept that the authority may check exclusion grounds for all subcontractors and demand replacements; subcontractors may not subcontract the entirety of their portion further.

Questions must be submitted via the specified e‑Procurement help form; the Q&A forum is closed typically one month before bid opening, after which no questions can be asked.

No site visit is mentioned.

As to contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text refers to “Err” versions (Err_1) indicating that certain documents are corrected versions of previous ones; it also notes that a general accounting clause in Annex D governs price‑revision formulae and that any bidder‑proposed formula must comply with it under penalty of irregularity.

Where both language versions address the same point (such as technical capacity references of at least 300,000 EUR, performance bond at 5%, electronic submission via e‑Procurement, and use of ESPD/DUME), they are consistent rather than contradictory; in case of doubt, Belgian practice usually gives precedence to the language specified as authentic in the notice, but the input text itself does not indicate any conflicting statement that changes the substance of the obligations described.

Answers on the required criteria

Must securities be provided (bid bond, performance or warranty guarantee)? If so: which, in what amount and by when?

Such as regarding securities: the contract requires a performance guarantee (cautionnement / borgtocht).

In application of article 25, §1 of AR2, the supplier must provide a cautionnement equal to 5% of the estimated value of the contract, excluding VAT.

The definitive amount and practical instructions are indicated in the contract, notification letter, purchase order or equivalent document; the text announces a “Délai pour le cautionnement” but the detailed deadline is truncated in the provided extract, so the exact time limit must be checked in the full section.

No separate bid bond or warranty guarantee is described; “Garantie S.O.” indicates no specific additional warranty security beyond the general performance guarantee.

Is subcontracting allowed? If so: with which limits and which disclosure duties?

Such as regarding subcontracting: the supplier is allowed to use subcontractors, under its sole and entire responsibility.

The bidder must state in the tender the part of the contract it intends to subcontract and the proposed subcontractors, with their identity.

If subcontractors are not yet known at submission time, their identity must be communicated in writing to the contracting authority at the latest the day before those subcontractors start performing any services.

Free choice of subcontractor is limited where the bidder has relied on predetermined subcontractors’ capacity for qualitative selection (e.g. professional qualifications or experience) or where the authority has imposed specific subcontractors; in those cases, their identity must always be indicated in the offer, and any change of subcontractor is subject to prior approval by the authority.

The authority may verify exclusion grounds for subcontractors at any level of the subcontracting chain and can require replacement of one or more subcontractors.

It is expressly forbidden for a subcontractor to subcontract the entirety of the work assigned to it to another subcontractor, including arrangements where the first subcontractor only keeps coordination.

Is there a site visit, and is attendance mandatory? If so: when?

Such as concerning site visits: the provided text does not mention any site visit, nor any obligation to attend a visit.

The contract concerns software licences for an existing GitLab on‑premise platform, and there is no indication in the extract of organised visits or inspection sessions, so no mandatory site visit can be inferred from the given material.

In which language must the tender and the supporting documents be submitted, and are documents in other languages accepted?

However, the technical part (“volet techniQUE” / “TECHNISCH luik”) may be written in French, Dutch or English only.

If the technical part is in English, the contracting authority reserves the right to request a translation at the bidder’s expense.

For other documents, for example those supporting a request for advance payment, any data or declarations drawn up in a language other than Dutch or French must be accompanied by a certified translation.

How long is the bidder bound by the tender (validity period), and is there a deadline for bidder questions? If so: until when?

Such as concerning tender validity and bidder questions: the bidder remains bound by its offer until 28 February 2027 (“le soumissionnaire reste engagé par son OFFRE jusqu'au 28 februari 2027”).

Questions from bidders must be submitted via the dedicated forum on the Belgian e‑Procurement platform (https://publicprocurement.be) no later than 12 November 2026, at 12:00.

Answers will be published on the same forum.

Bidders must note that the forum is subject to a closing date, usually set about one month before the opening of tenders (opening is scheduled for 19 November 2026 at 11:00); after closure, no further questions can be asked.

Further details

The input text is a Belgian public procurement dossier (cahier spécial des charges / bestek) of the Federal Police for a four‑year framework agreement for “GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On‑Premise” licences.

It sets the legal, administrative and technical conditions for bidders under Belgian law (law of 17 June 2016 and the royal decrees AR1 and AR2).

The point of view is that of Belgium as contracting authority, with explicit references to Belgian legislation and EU directives.

Any modification or withdrawal of the offer must be made through submission and electronic signature of a new “rapport de dépôt” (submission report); an unsigned report makes the modification/withdrawal null and the original offer remains fully valid.

Complétez les informations de votre entreprise — nous indiquerons si vous remplissez les exigences de chiffre d'affaires, d'assurance et de références →

Seuls les documents de l'acheteur font foi. Mis à jour: 30/10/2026

Clement
Sur les marchés comparables de ce secteur dans le pays (361 avec nombre d'offres connu), seulement 2 offres arrivaient en général — une offre solide a de vraies chances.

Critères de sélection — dans les documents de la consultation

L'acheteur indique dans l'avis que les critères de sélection figurent dans les documents de la consultation (lien sur cette page), pas dans le formulaire européen. L'analyse des documents ci-dessous les en extrait — offre et justificatifs en Français, Néerlandais.

Analyse d'éligibilité à partir du dossier

Documents de la consultation — téléchargement direct

⤓
Annexe 1
Cahier des charges et annexes chez l'acheteur — généralement consultables sans inscription
⤓
Conditions administratives
L'avis complet, texte officiel

Qui a déjà gagné chez cet acheteur

Tous types de marchés de cet acheteur confondus — pas seulement ce secteur. Une ville achète logiciels et véhicules d'incendie au même service achats.

EntrepriseAttributionsPériode
Kose Cleaning42025–2026
VDP SAFETY42024–2026
DataExpert B.V.32025–2026
Falcon Tactical Solutions32025–2026
DELPAC INTERNATIONAL32024–2025
D'après les attributions recensées · les lauréats réguliers connaissent les exigences de cet acheteur — c'est votre concurrence.

À quelle fréquence cet acheteur lance ce type de marché

2
2024
3
2025
6
2026
11 procédures dans cette catégorie depuis 2019. La commande publique se répète — qui connaît le rythme se prépare au lieu de réagir.

Contact de l'acheteur

·
Date limite — jeudi 19 novembre à 11:00

Tactique

Lorsque des marchés ont été attribués dans ce pays et ce secteur, il n'arrivait le plus souvent qu'une ou deux offres. Une offre solide a ici de vraies chances. (D'après 361 attributions terminées — aucune indication sur cette procédure.)

Cette procédure laisse 22 jours entre la publication et la date limite — l'usage dans ce pays est de 34 (médiane de 3 181 procédures). Nettement plus court que d'habitude : la première semaine compte.

Soumissionnaires étrangers

En Belgique · Logiciels & systèmes informatiques, 176 marchés ont été remportés par des entreprises étrangères sur 3 ans (sur 607 attributions recensées) — principalement : France, Allemagne, Pays-Bas.

Langue de l'offre : Français, Néerlandais.

Mesuré sur les attributions liées ; un lauréat étranger passant par une filiale locale compte comme national — la part réelle est plus élevée.

Comment candidater

Lire l'avis complet — Original + documents
Mène directement à cette procédure sur TED — Tenders Electronic Daily. Le cahier des charges et toutes les annexes s'y trouvent.
Cette procédure est publiée sur 2 portails
Le dépôt se fait sur BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — TED publie le même avis, généralement avec un cahier des charges plus détaillé. Lisez les deux.
TEDAvisBDA / e-Procurement BelgiumPortail de dépôt
Réunir les justificatifs — en Français, Néerlandais
Certificats, références et votre prix — selon l'avis.
Dépôt via TED — Tenders Electronic Daily avant la date limite
Dépôt électronique — prévoyez du temps pour l'inscription au portail la première fois.
Vers le portail →Avis officiel sur TED →
Nous collectons des millions d’avis. Si le lien ne fonctionne pas, signalez-le — nous trouverons le bon.

Ne manquez pas le prochain

Friedrich trouve des marchés comme celui-ci pour vous — chaque matin à 7 h 30, chacun vérifié par Claude (Anthropic), et il apprend de vos retours ce que fait vraiment votre entreprise.

S'inscrire maintenant