Friedrich & ClementBETA

How to bid in this country: portals, deadlines, thresholds →

File No 2027 R3 047 Relating to a multiannual framework agreement (4 years) of supplies for the acquisition and continuation of ‘GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On-Premise’ licences for the benefit of the Directorate for Police Information and ICT Resources

Dossier N° 2027 R3 047 Relatif un accord-cadre pluriannuel (4 ans) de fournitures pour l’acquisition et le continuation des licences «GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On-Premise » au profit de la Direction de l’information policière et des moyens ICT — original title

BEBelgium · Bruxelles

Your path to submission

  1. Deadline: 19 November at 11:00 — 18 days left.
  2. You submit on BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — not here and not by e-mail. ↗
  3. Offer and evidence in: French, Dutch.
  4. Collect your evidence — use the eligibility analysis on this page: it lists the requirements and, for known certificates, how to get them.
Compiled automatically from notice and documents — no guarantee; the procedure's wording is binding.

What the buyer is looking for

This public contract concerns a multi-annual (4-year) framework supply contract for the purchase and continuation of ‘GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On-Premise’ licences for the benefit of the Police Information and ICT Resources Directorate. The contract consists of a single lot, with one item: Item 1: GitLab Enterprise Premium - Self Managed On-Premise License

Machine translation (EU eTranslation) — official wording via the PDF link.

Contract

TypeSupplies
Estimated valuevalue not published
Published28 Oct 2026
ProcedureOpen procedure
Contract period1 Jan 2027 → 31 Dec 2030
Framework agreement

Type of service

48 · Software & IT systems
CPV 48000000

Clement What the numbers say about this buyer

  • 21% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (142 awards since 2024, spread over 111 companies). 79% went to new names.n = 142 awards since 2024
  • The median procedure drew 3 bids (93 procedures with a bid count); 25% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 2 bids.n = 93
  • The award came in at a median 85% of the estimated value (13 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually too high here.n = 13
  • Across 3 procedures with structured selection criteria, this buyer most often required: Average minimum turnover in the contract field (3 of 3).n = 3
  • 33% of awards went to companies from abroad (142 awards with a known winner country). Sector average: 34%.n = 142

From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 25/10/2026.

Tender documents at a glance

The essentials of the tender documents, checked statement by statement against the documents. For your bid, the original documents count.

Powered by eBriefing – EU language technology. Friedrich is an independent service, not an EU offering.

✓ found in the documents · ❓ not found in the documents or general statement

Public Tender Overview – GitLab Enterprise Premium Licences for Belgian Federal Police

The input text concerns a Belgian public procurement procedure launched by the Federal Police for a multi‑annual framework agreement to purchase and continue licences for “GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On‑Premise”.

It is written from the point of view of Belgian law and EU public procurement rules, referring explicitly to Belgium (Federal Police, Belgian legislation, Moniteur belge) and the European Union (EU directives, ESPD/DUME, sanctions against Russia, access of third‑country bidders).

The text explains in detail what bidders must submit and which minimum qualification requirements apply.

Such as: bidders must follow a defined offer structure (Annexe A) with (1) an administrative and price offer including the completed offer form and inventory (Annexe A/1), proof of the signatory’s power to bind the company (coordinated statutes, corporate acts, and, where applicable, mandate or power of attorney); (2) a selection file containing the ESPD/DUME in XML and PDF, and – if no free electronic database exists – recent certificates proving payment of social security contributions and taxes; (3) a price structure (Annexe C) per lot/post; and (4) detailed technical documentation addressing point‑by‑point all clauses in Annex B. If the bidder relies on other entities’ capacity, it must provide, such as, a separate ESPD for each entity plus a signed “déclaration d’engagement” on the mandatory template in Annex E, together with those entities’ corporate documents and mandates.

Offers must be submitted electronically via the Belgian e‑Procurement platform, signed with a qualified electronic signature; email submission is expressly forbidden.

Minimum qualification requirements relate mainly to technical and professional capacity.

Such as: bidders must present a list of principal deliveries of similar supplies (licences useful for software development) executed during the last three civil years plus the current year up to bid opening, stating amount, date and recipient (public or private).

The total value of these deliveries must be at least 300,000 EUR excl.

VAT, proven by a declaration and encoded in Part IV, Section C of the ESPD.

The contracting authority itself will systematically verify social and fiscal compliance (via TELEMARC for Belgian bidders or equivalent foreign databases; if none exists, bidders must attach recent certificates).

There are explicit exclusion grounds tied to EU law and Belgian law, including criminal convictions, tax/social debt, and specific EU sanctions against Russia; by submitting an offer, the bidder implicitly declares it is not covered by the Russian sanctions regime and, if from a non‑EU third country, it must rely on an applicable international treaty and attach a copy.

The scope of the contract is clearly defined.

Show all 53 statements

Such as: it is a four‑year framework agreement (1 January 2027 – 31 December 2030 in principle) for supplies – the purchase and continuation of GitLab Enterprise Premium self‑managed on‑premise licences for the Federal Police’s DevOps platform.

There is one lot and one post only: Post 1 – GitLab Enterprise Premium licence.

Estimated quantities are 250 licences per year in years 1–4; these are minimum quantities, and the authority reserves the right to order annually the quantities it needs, subject to those minima.

The maximum value of the framework is set at 504,000 EUR incl. VAT; once this ceiling is reached, the framework has no further effect, though it may be maintained, modified within legal limits, or terminated.

Delivery times for Post 1 must not exceed seven calendar days from the day after the partial order, and the bidder must describe SLA and support modalities, including response times and incident reporting mechanisms.

Award criteria and their weighting are simple and strictly price‑based.

The evaluated price is computed by multiplying the offered annual price for the single post by 250 licences (minimum quantity) x 4 years.

Prices must be in EUR (two decimals max), exclusive of VAT, but include all taxes and charges (including recycling contributions) and all costs necessary to meet the technical specifications: packaging, transport, insurance, customs, installation, commissioning, documentation, bug fixing, updates, new versions, online training resources, etc. Bidders may choose either fixed prices for the entire duration or a price‑revision formula (specified Agoria wage index formula or a bidder‑proposed formula complying with the general accounting clause in Annex D); in all cases, first‑year prices are firm.

The authority reserves broad rights to verify prices, demand detailed cost structures, and conduct on‑site and accounting controls at the bidder’s and subcontractors’ premises.

Risks and special conditions feature prominently.

Such as: a performance bond (cautionnement) of 5% of the estimated contract value excl.

VAT is required, to be constituted by one of the methods foreseen by AR2 (cash via e‑DEPO, act of joint guarantee through an approved financial institution deposited at the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, or bank/insurance guarantee sent to the contracting service).

There are detailed clauses on price revision, tax changes, possible suspension of advances if the contractor breaches obligations, and various modification scenarios (complementary supplies/services, unforeseeable events for either party) with caps of 50% of the initial value per modification.

Subcontracting is allowed but tightly regulated: the bidder must indicate in the offer the share to be subcontracted and identity of proposed subcontractors, notify any changes before performance, and accept that the authority may check exclusion grounds for all subcontractors and demand replacements; subcontractors may not subcontract the entirety of their portion further.

Questions must be submitted via the specified e‑Procurement help form; the Q&A forum is closed typically one month before bid opening, after which no questions can be asked.

No site visit is mentioned.

As to contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text refers to “Err” versions (Err_1) indicating that certain documents are corrected versions of previous ones; it also notes that a general accounting clause in Annex D governs price‑revision formulae and that any bidder‑proposed formula must comply with it under penalty of irregularity.

Where both language versions address the same point (such as technical capacity references of at least 300,000 EUR, performance bond at 5%, electronic submission via e‑Procurement, and use of ESPD/DUME), they are consistent rather than contradictory; in case of doubt, Belgian practice usually gives precedence to the language specified as authentic in the notice, but the input text itself does not indicate any conflicting statement that changes the substance of the obligations described.

Answers on the required criteria

Must securities be provided (bid bond, performance or warranty guarantee)? If so: which, in what amount and by when?

Such as regarding securities: the contract requires a performance guarantee (cautionnement / borgtocht).

In application of article 25, §1 of AR2, the supplier must provide a cautionnement equal to 5% of the estimated value of the contract, excluding VAT.

The definitive amount and practical instructions are indicated in the contract, notification letter, purchase order or equivalent document; the text announces a “Délai pour le cautionnement” but the detailed deadline is truncated in the provided extract, so the exact time limit must be checked in the full section.

No separate bid bond or warranty guarantee is described; “Garantie S.O.” indicates no specific additional warranty security beyond the general performance guarantee.

Is subcontracting allowed? If so: with which limits and which disclosure duties?

Such as regarding subcontracting: the supplier is allowed to use subcontractors, under its sole and entire responsibility.

The bidder must state in the tender the part of the contract it intends to subcontract and the proposed subcontractors, with their identity.

If subcontractors are not yet known at submission time, their identity must be communicated in writing to the contracting authority at the latest the day before those subcontractors start performing any services.

Free choice of subcontractor is limited where the bidder has relied on predetermined subcontractors’ capacity for qualitative selection (e.g. professional qualifications or experience) or where the authority has imposed specific subcontractors; in those cases, their identity must always be indicated in the offer, and any change of subcontractor is subject to prior approval by the authority.

The authority may verify exclusion grounds for subcontractors at any level of the subcontracting chain and can require replacement of one or more subcontractors.

It is expressly forbidden for a subcontractor to subcontract the entirety of the work assigned to it to another subcontractor, including arrangements where the first subcontractor only keeps coordination.

Is there a site visit, and is attendance mandatory? If so: when?

Such as concerning site visits: the provided text does not mention any site visit, nor any obligation to attend a visit.

The contract concerns software licences for an existing GitLab on‑premise platform, and there is no indication in the extract of organised visits or inspection sessions, so no mandatory site visit can be inferred from the given material.

In which language must the tender and the supporting documents be submitted, and are documents in other languages accepted?

However, the technical part (“volet techniQUE” / “TECHNISCH luik”) may be written in French, Dutch or English only.

If the technical part is in English, the contracting authority reserves the right to request a translation at the bidder’s expense.

For other documents, for example those supporting a request for advance payment, any data or declarations drawn up in a language other than Dutch or French must be accompanied by a certified translation.

How long is the bidder bound by the tender (validity period), and is there a deadline for bidder questions? If so: until when?

Such as concerning tender validity and bidder questions: the bidder remains bound by its offer until 28 February 2027 (“le soumissionnaire reste engagé par son OFFRE jusqu'au 28 februari 2027”).

Questions from bidders must be submitted via the dedicated forum on the Belgian e‑Procurement platform (https://publicprocurement.be) no later than 12 November 2026, at 12:00.

Answers will be published on the same forum.

Bidders must note that the forum is subject to a closing date, usually set about one month before the opening of tenders (opening is scheduled for 19 November 2026 at 11:00); after closure, no further questions can be asked.

Further details

The input text is a Belgian public procurement dossier (cahier spécial des charges / bestek) of the Federal Police for a four‑year framework agreement for “GitLab Enterprise Premium – Self Managed On‑Premise” licences.

It sets the legal, administrative and technical conditions for bidders under Belgian law (law of 17 June 2016 and the royal decrees AR1 and AR2).

The point of view is that of Belgium as contracting authority, with explicit references to Belgian legislation and EU directives.

Any modification or withdrawal of the offer must be made through submission and electronic signature of a new “rapport de dépôt” (submission report); an unsigned report makes the modification/withdrawal null and the original offer remains fully valid.

Add your company details — we'll show whether you meet turnover, insurance and reference requirements →

Only the contracting authority's tender documents are binding. As of: 30/10/2026

Clement
In comparable contracts in this sector nationwide (361 with a known bid count), usually only 2 offers came in — a solid bid has real chances.
References and certificates from your home country count fully across the EU — that is what European procurement law is for.

Selection criteria — in the procurement documents

The buyer states in the notice that the selection criteria are in the procurement documents (link on this page), not in the EU form. The document analysis below extracts them from there — bid and evidence in French, Dutch.

Eligibility analysis from the tender documents

Tender documents — direct download

⤓
Annex 1
Specifications and annexes at the buyer — usually viewable without registration
⤓
Administrative conditions
The full notice, official wording

Who has won at this buyer so far

Across all contract types of this buyer — not just this sector. A city buys software and fire engines through the same purchasing office.

CompanyAwardsPeriod
Kose Cleaning42025–2026
VDP SAFETY42024–2026
Falcon Tactical Solutions32025–2026
DataExpert B.V.32025–2026
DELPAC INTERNATIONAL32024–2025
From the recorded awards · regular winners know this buyer's requirements — that is your competition.

How often this buyer tenders this kind of work

2
2024
3
2025
6
2026
11 procedures in this category since 2019. Public procurement repeats itself — those who know the rhythm prepare instead of reacting.

Contracting authority contact

·
Deadline — Thursday 19 November at 11:00

Tactics

When contracts were awarded in this country and sector, usually only one or two bids came in. A solid bid has a real chance here. (Based on 361 completed awards — not a statement about this procedure.)

This procedure allows 22 days between publication and deadline — typical in this country is 34 (median of 3,233 procedures). Much tighter than usual: the first week counts.

Foreign bidders

In Belgium · Software & IT systems, 176 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 607 recorded awards) — mostly from France, Germany, Netherlands.

Submission language: French, Dutch.

Measured from linked award data; foreign winners bidding through a local subsidiary count as domestic — the true share is higher.

How to bid

Read the full notice — Original + documents
Goes directly to this tender on TED — Tenders Electronic Daily. The full specification and all annexes are there.
This procedure is published on 2 portals
Bids are submitted on BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — TED carries the same notice, usually with the more detailed specification. Read both.
TEDNoticeBDA / e-Procurement BelgiumSubmission portal
Put together the evidence — in French, Dutch
Certificates, references and your price — as set out in the notice.
Submit via TED — Tenders Electronic Daily before the deadline
Electronic submission — allow time for the portal registration the first time.
To the procurement portal →Official notice on TED →
We pull data from millions of notices. If the link here does not work, report it — we will find the right one.

Don't miss the next one

Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, each one checked by Claude (Anthropic) for fit, and he learns from your feedback what your company really does.

Register now