Service d'attention au public, d'information et d'interprétation pour les visiteurs de la Maison du Parc de Hoces del Río Duratón, années 2027-2028

✓Such as regarding award criteria and weighting, the contract is awarded without electronic auction and uses both criteria evaluable by formulas and by judgement of value.

✓In Sobre 3 (economic offer), there is a price criterion (“Oferta económica: Precio”) and an improvement criterion (“Horas de mejora sin cargo para Patrimonio Natural”).

❓“Ponderación: EUROS” or “Ponderación: 0”), so the exact numeric scoring scale is to be clarified in the PCAP.

✓For Sobre 2 (technical offer), qualitative criteria include, among others: proposals for promoting visits to the Centre (1.1), guided interpretation of the Centre and its surroundings (1.2), management of educational workshops and programmes (1.3, 1.4), explanation of service functioning and detailed planning (2.1), allocation of staff, materials and technical means (2.2), and knowledge of the area for public information (3.1).

✓Each criterion has a “Subtipo Criterio” value (from 6 to 8 etc.), suggesting internal weighting within the qualitative evaluation.

✓Such as to risks and special conditions, the contract requires a definitive performance guarantee of 5% of the contract amount.

✓Subcontracting is explicitly permitted.

✓There are special environmental execution conditions (“Consideraciones de tipo medioambiental – Según PCAP”), hinting at additional obligations on how the service is delivered.

✓The act of opening economic offers is public.

❓Penalties, detailed guarantees, and any further special conditions (e.g. service levels, staff requirements, insurance) are not spelled out here and must be consulted in the PCAP and the technical specifications.

❓The text does not explicitly mention a separate question or clarification deadline beyond the “Plazo de Obtención de Pliegos” (09/11/2026 at 14:00), which in Spanish practice often coincides with the last day to submit queries via the contracting profile.

❓A notable anomaly is the “Plazo de Presentación” for “Presentación de recursos” (appeals) appearing as “Hasta el 19/10/2026 a las 14:00”, which is earlier than the publication date (22‑10‑2026) and therefore cannot logically apply to this tender; it is likely a system or template error, so the applicable deadlines for appeals should be those set by Spanish public procurement law counted from the date of publication or award, not this date.

✓Another inconsistency is the way award weights are displayed for economic criteria (“Ponderación: 0”, “Ponderación: EUROS”); this looks like a formatting/export problem, meaning that the binding weighting must be taken from the PCAP rather than the summary fields reproduced here.