Work replacing road sanitation network MA-1015 No 20-36 T.M. Calvià

✓The estimated value (VEC) and net tender budget (PBAL, IVA excluded) are both 144,441.75 EUR; the gross amount shown in the platform is 174,774.52 EUR (including IVA in practice, although the pliegos are prepared without IVA as cost, due to Calvià 2000’s partial deductibility and tax treatment).

✓The execution period is two months from the signing of the replanteo verification act, with the caveat that municipal ordinances may impose a summer high‑season stoppage, effectively extending calendar duration.

✓Start of replanteo must occur within a maximum of one week after the authority’s request.

✓The works are remunerated at a lump sum (a tanto alzado) with no unit prices, and the cost breakdown is 77% direct costs and 23% indirect costs.

✓There is no division into lots, explicitly justified on technical and coordination grounds.

✓Such as for award criteria and weighting: the contract is processed under an “procedimiento abierto simplificado” and the award is based exclusively on the price, with “precio más bajo” as the only criterion.

✓The price criterion is evaluated with a formula up to 100 points: (OfM / OfP) x PUN, where OfM is the lowest valid bid, OfP is the bidder’s price, and PUN is the total points assigned to price (in practice PUN = 100).

✓No qualitative criteria, variants or improvements are admitted.

✓There is no electronic auction.

✓Such as relates to risks and special conditions: special environmental conditions require minimising noise and vibrations, scheduling disruptive tasks at times compatible with citizens’ rest, and segregating recyclable materials into separate containers; these conditions are explicitly stated not to be “obligaciones esenciales” nor “infracciones graves” under LCSP.

✓During works, the sewer network must remain in service; the contractor must provide temporary pumping equipment, generators, mixed vacuum trucks, hoses, and isolation devices to avoid spills of wastewater.

✓The guarantee regime includes: no provisional guarantee; a definitive guarantee equal to 5% of the contract amount, in any form allowed under LCSP art. 108.1; no complementary guarantee; and a one‑year warranty period from reception of the works.

✓Price revision does not apply (“No procede revisión de precios”).

✓No additional penalties or special termination causes beyond those in the LCSP are foreseen.

✓Subcontracting is allowed under LCSP art. 215, but the bidder must indicate in its offer the portion of the contract to be subcontracted via a specific “Declaración relativa a la subcontratación” document available in the profile; crucially, the engineer (jefe de obra) and site foreman (encargado de obra), considered critical roles, cannot be subcontracted and must belong to the awarding company.

✓The jefe de obra must hold a suitable university degree (Civil, Public Works, Industrial engineering or equivalents, including pre‑Bologna and current Grado/Master qualifications under specific CIN orders) and have proven experience, with at least 50% dedication; the foreman must have full‑time dedication.

❓There is no mention of a compulsory site visit or question deadline beyond the general deadline for obtaining documents and submitting offers (09/11/2026 at 23:59).

✓Invoice must not be electronic (“No se aceptará factura electrónica”).

✓Such as for contradictions or corrections within the documents: the main apparent discrepancy is between platform fields showing a “Presupuesto base de licitación – Importe 174.774,52 EUR, Importe (sin impuestos) 144.441,75 EUR” and the pliego/memoria language, which repeatedly state “PBAL: 144.441,75 € (más IVA en vigor)” and “VEC: 144.441,75 € (IVA no incluido)”.

✓This is reconciled by understanding that 144,441.75 EUR is the base amount net of IVA and 174,774.52 EUR is the total including IVA as shown in the electronic notice; the contracting authority’s internal pliegos deliberately exclude IVA from the cost due to its particular deduction regime.

✓Another point that might look inconsistent is that the platform lists “clasificación empresarial solicitada E1‑1” while the pliego clarifies that, given VEC < 500,000 EUR, classification is optional and solvency may be proven either through classification or through the specific turnover and references criteria; in practice, the pliego’s explanation governs how solvency can be accredited.

✓Likewise, the award section in the platform shows “Precio – Ponderación: 0 – Cantidad Mínima: 100 – Cantidad Máxima: [blank]”, but the narrative in the pliegos and in the initiation agreement clearly applies 100 points to price and gives the explicit formula; thus, the detailed pliego text should be considered authoritative for scoring.