How to bid in this country: portals, deadlines, thresholds →
Supply of urban furniture through the establishment of a dynamic acquisition system.
Suministro mobiliario urbano mediante el establecimiento de un sistema dinámico de adquisición. — original title
Your path to submission
- Deadline for requests to participate: 8 May 2027 at 23:59 — 189 days left. Two-stage procedure: by this deadline you submit a request to participate (proof of eligibility). Only shortlisted firms are then invited to submit a tender.
- You submit on PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público — not here and not by e-mail. ↗ Submission via the Plataforma de Contratación (PLACSP): registration plus a recognised digital certificate / eIDAS signature — as an EU bidder, arrange this early; it typically takes days. Sort out account and signature first — not on submission day.
- Collect your evidence — use the eligibility analysis on this page: it lists the requirements and, for known certificates, how to get them.
Contract
Type of service
Clement What the numbers say about this buyer
- 17% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (630 awards since 2020, spread over 345 companies). That is well below the sector norm (63%) — this buyer switches suppliers more often than others.n = 630 awards since 2020
- In this sector the buyer awards roughly every 3 months (38 awards, most recently August 2026) — the next award is due around November 2026 by that rhythm. The last award went to SERVEO SERVICIOS S.A.U.n = 38
- The median procedure drew just one bid (416 procedures with a bid count); 75% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 2 bids.n = 416
- The award came in at a median 73% of the estimated value (308 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually too high here. Sector: 82%.n = 308
- Not one of the 630 awards with a known winner country has gone to a foreign company so far. Sector average: 1%.n = 630
From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 01/11/2026.
Tender documents at a glance
The essentials of the tender documents, checked statement by statement against the documents. For your bid, the original documents count.
Powered by eBriefing – EU language technology. Friedrich is an independent service, not an EU offering.
✓ found in the documents · ❓ not found in the documents or general statement
Urban furniture supply via a dynamic purchasing system for Rivas‑Vaciamadrid (Spain)
The input text concerns a public procurement procedure in Spain, specifically from the Spanish public sector entity “Rivas‑Vaciamadrid Empresa Municipal de Servicios, S.A.” (Rivamadrid).
It describes the establishment and operation of a Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición (dynamic purchasing system, SDA) for the supply of urban furniture in Rivas‑Vaciamadrid, under Spanish Law 9/2017 on Public Sector Contracts and EU Directive 2014/24/EU.
The point of view is that of a Spanish contracting authority, with references to EU law but no other countries’ national rules.
The background is that Rivamadrid, as a contracting authority, launches a restricted procedure to set up a dynamic purchasing system for urban furniture (CPV 34928400) for its parks and gardens/mantenimiento department.
The SDA is configured to ensure transparency, competition and equal treatment, with homologation rounds admitting suppliers to the system.
Regarding what the bidder must submit and the minimum qualification requirements, the text states that participation requests are submitted electronically via PLACSP with a “sobre único” containing administrative documentation as specified in CCP section H. Such as, bidders must submit: the DEUC (European Single Procurement Document), Anexos I, II and IV, plus documentation for registration in the ROLECE (or equivalent regional register or proof of application plus responsible declaration).
They must also provide positive certificates from Social Security and AEAT (tax authority), and “documentos acreditativos de solvencias”.
Solvency requirements are: economic‑financial—annual turnover in the best of the last three years at least 25% of the estimated average annual contract value, evidenced by accounts (or, for individuals, Anexo I; for new companies, a professional liability insurance covering the solvency amount); and technical—contracts of similar nature in the last three years representing at least 25% of the estimated average annual contract value, evidenced by invoices, contracts or completion certificates (for new firms, proof of allocated means before award).
The text clarifies that, as such, these solvencies only need to be fully accredited by the best‑ranked bidder when requested.
Homologation documentation in the acta (GLOBALIA, FORJA ESTILO ESPAÑOL, etc.) confirms that admitted suppliers effectively submitted DEUC, annexes, ROLECE/alternative register and certificates.
On the scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the object is consistently described as “Suministro mobiliario urbano mediante el establecimiento de un sistema dinámico de adquisición” (supply of urban furniture).
The value is a “valor estimado” of 50,000 EUR (without VAT), with a budget of 60,500 EUR (with VAT) and no forecasted modifications.
Show all 35 statements
The geographic scope is Rivas‑Vaciamadrid (Subentidad Nacional Madrid, address Mariano Fortuny 2, 28522, Spain), and the contract type is supplies, subtype acquisition, non‑mixed.
The SDA’s duration is an initial 24 months from the date of the first homologation, with total duration also 24 months, and no prorogations.
In the platform notice, the period of execution is from 07/05/2025 to 08/05/2027, and the “periodo de vigencia del sistema dinámico” is until 08/05/2027, which in practical terms aligns the SDA with a two‑year validity.
There are no lot divisions (justification: splitting would hinder proper technical execution), and no partial deadlines (plazos parciales: No).
Concerning award criteria and weighting, there is a distinction between the SDA establishment and the “contratos basados”.
The SDA itself “no tiene criterios de adjudicación, sólo se configura a efectos de la presentación en plataforma”; the platform shows “Precio” with 100% weighting merely for configuration.
However, the CCP states that contracts based on the SDA will be awarded on the best quality‑price ratio, using various objective and subjective criteria.
Such as: price or cost of the supplies (with a weighting between 0% and 100% of total points, specified in each based contract) and quality‑related criteria (between 0% and 50% of total points) including reduction of delivery times, quality of materials, quality of execution, and quality of after‑sales service or guarantees.
The initial approval agreement also refers generally to “criterios de adjudicación: objetivos y subjetivos” and confirms that the contract will be adjudicated on best quality‑price.
Candidate selection for participation in the restricted procedure may be limited, with a minimum quantity of five bidders as per the platform notice, based on objective criteria defined in the Pliego Modelo.
With respect to risks and special conditions, the text specifies several areas: guarantees, penalties, special execution clauses, coordination and data protection.
There is a definitive economic guarantee of 5% of the award price to be provided before adjudication, set individually for each contract based on the SDA, and a technical guarantee such that the contractor must respond for 12 months from the reception act for all supplies.
Special execution conditions, of an essential contractual nature (non‑compliance can lead to termination), include social measures (promoting effective equality between men and women) and environmental measures (recycling products, use of reusable packaging).
Such as, failure to comply with these conditions is a “falta grave” and may result in contract resolution or penalties up to 10% of the contract price (excluding VAT), under Article 202.3 LCSP.
Penalties for SDA operation include: for delay—suspension of participation in the SDA for 2 to 4 months per day of delay, and for defective execution of a based contract leading to culpable termination—3% of the based contract per day of delay.
Coordination of business activities applies (although the checkboxes in the form appear inconsistent: text says “Sí” with requirement for Anexo IX, but the box for “No” is marked); Rivamadrid’s own prevention service will liaise with the best‑valued bidder to manage occupational risk coordination documentation.
Treatment and transfer of personal data are marked “No” (i.e. execution does not require processing or transfer of personal data on behalf of the controller).
The validity period of offers in the platform notice is 24 months, and the system remains open to new homologations throughout its vigency, with the list of homologated suppliers expressly non‑limitative and to be updated and published.
Subcontracting is not explicitly regulated in the extracts shown; any rules would likely be in the Pliego Modelo.
For example, the duration is described in the CCP as 24 months from first homologation without prorogues, and the agreement approving expenditure confirms “duración principal 24 meses.
Sin previsión de prórrogas”, while the platform notice gives 07/05/2025–08/05/2027; these statements are compatible and the 24‑month term applies.
The SDA is said in the CCP and approval agreements to be awarded on best quality‑price with several criteria, whereas the platform configuration shows only price with 100% weight but explicitly clarifies that “El SDA no tiene criterios de adjudicación, sólo se configura a efectos de la presentación en plataforma”; therefore, the CCP’s detailed criteria for contracts based on the SDA prevail.
Another minor contradiction occurs in the coordination empresarial section where the narrative says “Sí: Se deberá proceder…” but the “No” box is checked; given the explicit obligation to carry out coordination, submit Anexo IX and the nature of occupational risk rules, the text (“Sí”) and CCP should be considered prevailing over the mis‑checked box.
Only the contracting authority's tender documents are binding. As of: 20/10/2026
Eligibility analysis from the tender documents
Who has won at this buyer so far
Across all contract types of this buyer — not just this sector. A city buys software and fire engines through the same purchasing office.
| Company | Awards | Period |
|---|---|---|
| FORADEM CONSULTORES, SL | 9 | 2023–2026 |
| El Hormiguero Comunicación y Producciones S.L. | 8 | 2023–2026 |
| ROS ROCA, S.A. | 7 | 2020–2025 |
| GRUPO INDUSTRIAL DE SUMINISTROS Y FERRETERIA ROME SL · ajalvir | 7 | 2022–2025 |
| Tecnifrenos, SA · Madrid | 7 | 2021–2026 |
How often this buyer tenders this kind of work
Tactics
When this buyer has awarded in this sector, there was usually a single bid in the end. A solid bid has a real chance here. (Based on 7 completed awards — not a statement about this procedure.)
This procedure allows 611 days between publication and deadline — typical in this country is 26 (median of 7,730 procedures). Much more generous than usual — time for a thorough bid rather than a quick one.
Foreign bidders
In Spain · Transport equipment, 344 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 39,598 recorded awards) — mostly from Italy, Germany, France.
How to bid
Guide: how to apply on PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público (Spanien) → Registration, signature, fees — from the operator's bidder manual.
Don't miss the next one
Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, each one checked by Claude (Anthropic) for fit, and he learns from your feedback what your company really does.
Register now