Dynamic system for the acquisition of spare parts for bicycles and stations of the BICIMAD public bicycle service (11 Categories)

✓Regarding award criteria and weighting, the input text makes clear that, for specific contracts under the SDA, EMT will apply a single award criterion: price.

✓Such as explained in the justification section (Art. 116.4.c LCSP), price is given a 100% weighting and evaluated by a linear formula: P_l = (O_b / O_l) × 100, where O_b is the lowest valid offer, O_l is the offer being evaluated, and P_l the points awarded.

✓This ensures proportional scoring based solely on the discount offered.

✓The CPV codes listed for the SDA give the technical scope (bicycles, motors, electrical equipment, adhesives, ferretería, transmission elements, etc.), while the public notice fragments for Category 11 (vinilo) show that the criteria of solvency defined in the PCG are also reflected in the electronic tender notice, although the notice text itself ambiguously labels solvency compliance as a “criterion” with a 100 weighting in the contracting platform.

✓As to risks and special conditions, the text outlines several obligations that create risk allocation for bidders.

✓Such as the compulsory future insurance: bidders must sign Anexo X committing, if awarded a specific contract, to take out and maintain a general civil liability insurance for third-party damage with a minimum coverage equal to the estimated value of the specific contract per claim and year.

✓Any deductible (“franquicia”) in the policy must be borne by the contractor, and EMT may recover deductible amounts either by direct payment, invoice deduction, or retention of the performance guarantee where applicable.

✓There is also a special environmental execution condition: the contractor must use materials and work systems that are environmentally friendly and protect health and safety.

❓Each individual requerimiento to bidders has its own 3-day deadline for clarifications and document completion via PLYCA, and contact is centralized through EMT’s phone number; no site visit or question deadline for the initial SDA admission is explicitly described in the excerpts.

✓On contradictions or corrections within the documents, the main apparent tension arises from how award criteria are displayed in the external platform versus the internal PCG.

⚠Such as in the Category 11 notice, the Platform of Contracting shows “Cumplir los criterios de solvencias establecidos en el PCG: Otros – Ponderación 100” under “Criterios de adjudicación,” which could suggest solvency as an award criterion; however, the PCG and the internal memory (Memoria justificativa, page 14) clearly state that the only award criterion is price (100% weighting) and that solvency is a participation requirement, not a scored criterion.

✓Similarly, where bidder-specific requerimientos add clarifications (e.g. reminding that amounts must match the solvency tables on page 18 of the PCG, or that illegible documents must be replaced), these are corrections of incomplete submissions rather than changes to the underlying rules, and the governing statements remain those in the PCG and the approved memorum.