"Equipping OSP units in Świnna Municipality with rescue and firefighting equipment".

… Party, in accordance with the provisions of Art. 5 and Art. 101 para. 4 of the PPL Act, allows equivalent solutions for supplies, works, materials, systems that meet the requirements specified in the procurement documents. The contracting authority stipulates that, wherever trade marks, patents or the origin of equipment or materials are indicated in the description of the subject-matter of the contract in Annex 5 to the FTZ – Description of the subject-matter of the contract, they must be regarded only as proposals. The Ordering Party allows methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies, etc. equivalent to those presented in the description of the subject of the contract. It is therefore permissible to propose in the offer any equivalent market equivalents with properties not worse than those indicated by the Ordering Party. The parameters indicated in the procurement documents shall specify the minimum technical, operational, performance, quality and functional conditions to be met by the subject-matter of the contract. The offer may include methods, materials, devices, systems, technologies, but with technical, quality, performance and functional parameters. At the request of the Contracting Authority, the Contractor is obliged to prove that the solutions applied will achieve all the technical assumptions for the investment task in question, taking into account the entire investment, and not the selected part of the whole. The burden of proving that the material or equipment is equivalent to the requirement specified by the Contracting Authority shall lie with the Contractor. If the materials and/or equipment offered by the Contractor as equivalent are not equivalent in the light of the documents submitted by the Contractor, the Contractor's tender will be rejected as not corresponding to the content of the FTZ. In the case of describing the subject of the contract by reference to standards, European technical assessments, approvals, technical specifications and technical reference systems, the Contracting Authority shall allow the performance of the contract using solutions equivalent to those described. In such a case, the procedure described in the previous text of this paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis; 2) in the case of equivalent technologies, systems, materials or equipment accepted by the Contractor, the tender must be accompanied by a list of these technologies, systems, devices or materials, which will include in its content: the type and description of the technology or system used, the name of the device/material used, the name of the manufacturer, the precise and unambiguous type of device or material; 3) in addition, for technologies/systems/devices/equivalent materials, the Contracting Authority requires proof of equivalence, including by means of technologies/systems/devices/equivalent materials attached to the list; calculations, detailed technical drawings, approvals, declarations of conformity to regulations and standards and data sheets of manufacturers of equivalent equipment/materials. These documents must state unequivocally the equivalence of the proposed technologies/systems/equipment/materials; 4) in the event of doubts as to the equivalence proposed in the order