PolBln 413_26 PolBln 413_26 SanKw 2027

Such as concerning the scope of the contract, the tender is for a supply contract: “Beschaffung von 1 Stück Sanitätskraftwagen (SanKw) 2027 / Soll‑Nr.: 060/02”, CPV codes 34114200‑1 and 34114110‑3. The performance location is Berlin; the vehicle must be delivered free to the acceptance point designated by the contracting authority, with the place of performance being Berlin (as stated in Wirt‑121 and Wirt‑215). The execution period starts after award (“ab Auftragsvergabe”), and the vehicle is to be delivered as soon as possible, with the latest permissible delivery date being 01 October 2027. The delivery date is defined as the date of successful acceptance and takeover of the vehicle by the contracting authority in Berlin. Partial deliveries before the latest date are allowed. The documents also clarify that it is not a framework agreement and that only one lot (no losweise Vergabe) is foreseen.

Such as on award criteria and weighting, the procedure uses the economic most advantageous tender concept under § 127 GWB, focusing on the best price‑performance ratio. The announcement (Wirt‑121) specifies that the single formal Zuschlagskriterium is “100% Preis”; i.e. in this concrete procedure the award is based solely on price, because no qualitative criteria are indicated as being applied. The generic Verfahrensbedingungen describe how, where qualitative criteria exist, scoring and weighting would work (including KO criteria and linear interpolation of price points), but for this particular tender those mechanisms are not triggered since only price is scored. The evaluation steps are: formal check (timely and compliant submission), suitability check (meeting published minimum requirements and no exclusion grounds), and then price comparison, with the lowest compliant price receiving the award. If several offers have identical results, drawing lots is foreseen.

Such as concerning risks and special conditions, the documents include multiple contractual clauses: the binding period runs until the end of the Zuschlagsfrist; offers can be changed or withdrawn only until the end of the Angebotsfrist, after which bidders are bound. Questions must be submitted via the platform no later than 7 days before the end of the Angebotsfrist; the answers become binding parts of the tender and, where they affect contract terms or specifications, of the contract itself. Side offers (Nebenangebote) are not allowed, though multiple main offers are; any ambiguities must be raised via bidder questions. Subcontracting and reliance on other companies’ capacities are tightly regulated: intended subcontracts/Eignungsleihe must be declared using Wirt‑235; capacities must be secured by Wirt‑236 commitment declarations, and subcontractors/auxiliary companies must provide their own Wirt‑124 declarations. The contracting authority can require replacement of subcontractors if exclusion grounds arise. A clause specifies that the contract must be executed by the contractor itself or a member of a bidding consortium; consortium members must declare joint and several liability via Wirt‑238. Contractual penalties (Vertragsstrafen) are stipulated: for delay beyond the latest delivery date, 0.1% per completed day (or a weekly rate to be inserted) of the non‑usable portion of the performance, capped at 5% of the remuneration; further damages can also be claimed. Security (Sicherheitsleistung) is explicitly stated as “entfällt”, so no performance or warranty bond is demanded. Payment conditions and skonto provisions are laid out in Wirt‑215, and there are extensive special conditions under Wirt‑214.1, Wirt‑2143 and Wirt‑2144 concerning minimum pay, tariff compliance, anti‑discrimination, and controls/sanctions under the BerlAVG, including possible contractual penalties, termination, and notification to authorities in case of violations. A “Zweitbieterklausel” allows the authority to turn to the next-ranked bidder if the awarded contractor later fails definitively.

Such as for contradictions or corrections within the documents, the Verfahrensbedingungen clarify the hierarchy: special conditions override general ones; if bidders see inconsistencies, they must promptly alert the contracting authority via the platform. The text itself notes that despite due care, the tender documents may inadvertently contain incorrect or inconsistent information, and the contracting authority’s liability for such is excluded as far as legally permissible. Answers to bidder questions are explicitly made integral and binding parts of the tender and the contract where they relate to conditions or specification; thus, if a later answer contradicts an earlier statement, the updated, clarified version in the answer prevails. In the Wirt‑215 BVB section there is a generic list of possible supplementary BVBs (including ILO, Frauenförderung, Umweltschutz), but the “Einzureichende Unterlagen und Nachweise” sheet clarifies which of these actually apply (for this procedure: Wirt‑214.1, Wirt‑2143, Wirt‑2144, but not Wirt‑2140, 2141, 2145), so the checkmarked configuration sheet should be treated as authoritative. Where general Verfahrensbedingungen mention possible qualitative criteria and test placements, the announcement and overview for this project specify that the award is 100% price and that test placement (“verifizierende Teststellung”) is only “bei Bedarf”; thus only those mechanisms expressly activated in the project-specific forms and later clarifications apply to this tender.