Prestation de services sur le marché du travail pour une mesure au titre de l’article 16, paragraphe 1, du SGB II, lu en combinaison avec l’article 45 [...]

✓On the scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the Leistungsbeschreibung Teil II and Vertragsbedingungen Teil III fix the core content.

✓Such as: the service is “Kompetenzfeststellung für erwerbsfähige Leistungsberechtigte mit Migrationshintergrund” under § 16 SGB II i.V.m. § 45 SGB III, structured in zwei Module (Interview/Befragung und Grundlagenvermittlung; praktische Erprobungen).

✓Award criteria and weighting are laid out in the Bewertungsmatrix (Teil I, I.7–I.10).

✓Such as: the Zuschlag goes to the “wirtschaftlichstes Angebot”, determined by an extended “Richtwertmethode” (UfAB 2018) combining price (Wertungspreis, fiktiver Gesamtpreis from Preisblatt) and qualitative performance points from the concept.

✓The concept is evaluated in defined Wertungsbereichen (e.g.

✓I.10.1 Auftragsbezogene Zusammenarbeit, I.10.2 Strategische/Teilnehmerbezogene Vorgehensweise, I.10.3 Organisation und Durchführungsqualität), each with weighted criteria and Relevanzfaktoren.

✓Only four quality levels (0–3 points) are used; 0 points in any criterion marked with *) leads to exclusion, and offers must reach at least 85 % of the points corresponding to “2 Punkte in allen Kriterien” across the main Wertungsbereiche I.10.1–I.10.4 to remain in the competition.

✓Among offers within a defined performance‑price corridor, the decision criterion is the highest point score in I.10.2; in case of a tie, lower price or ultimately lot drawing decides.

✓Risks and special conditions are numerous and come mainly from the Vertragsbedingungen Teil III, VOL/B, and the BbgVergG‑Formulare 5.1/5.3/5.4.

✓Such as: there are extensive contractual penalties (Vertragsstrafen) up to insgesamt 5 % des Auftragswertes, e.g. for delayed measure start (per week up to 5 % der betroffenen Maßnahme), significant duty breaches (e.g. personnel key not met, insufficient qualifications, unsuitable premises, lack of cooperation with regional labour market actors, data protection breaches, non‑compliance with AEntG, MiLoG or vergabespezifischen Mindestentgelten under § 185 SGB III).

✓Security (Sicherheitsleistung) under VOL/B can be required for contracts above 50,000 €, but the Auftraggeber may not demand “Bürgschaft auf erstes Anfordern”.

✓Subcontracting is allowed only with prior approval and under identical conditions; Eignungsleihe is permitted but must be fully documented, and non‑qualified partners must be replaced.

✓The Bindefrist and deadlines (Frist für Bieteranfragen 24.11.2026, Angebotsfrist 30.12.2026; Bindefrist as per Aufforderung 3.1) define temporal risk for bid validity.

✓On contradictions or corrections, the documents themselves specify the applicable hierarchy to resolve inconsistencies.

✓Such as: VOL/B § 1(2) and Vertragsbedingungen § 2(1) state that, in case of conflict, the specific Leistungsbeschreibung and Besonderen Vertragsbedingungen (including Preisblatt and BbgVergG‑Ergänzungen) override VOL/B and any bidder general terms.

✓Similarly, the Scientology‑Ausschluss is both in IV.2.2.10 and Vertrag § 13; the contractual clause will govern performance, while the Eigenerklärung governs eligibility.

✓In case of discrepancies on penalties, the more specific contractual provisions in Teil III (e.g. § 8–10, § 25) prevail over the general VOL/B § 11, subject to the overall maximum of 5 % contract value expressly set in the special conditions.