OC-M-26005; 51.1012/26 Réouverture de la route M-110. SGE-ACC-25-004.

On the scope of the contract, the text specifies what, where and when, although not detailed quantities. Such as: the object is the reopening works of road M‑110, including construction and paving works as per CPV 45233000. The estimated value is 644.765,93 EUR, with a base tender budget of 780.166,78 EUR (644.765,93 EUR before taxes), indicating the financial magnitude. The place of performance is the Comunidad de Madrid (sub-entity code ES3, Spain), with the contracting authority based at Paseo de la Castellana 67 and openings held telematically at Paseo de la Castellana 67 and Av. General Perón 38 in Madrid. The execution period is fixed at 3 months (“Plazo de Ejecución 3 Mes(es)”) from contract start; more precise phasing and quantities are presumably detailed in the technical specifications (Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas), which are referenced but not reproduced here.

Concerning award criteria and weighting, the contract is adjudicated via a “Procedimiento Abierto” with criteria “evaluables mediante aplicación de fórmulas.” Such as: two automatic criteria are mentioned – “Incremento de gastos de ensayos” (tests/inspection cost increment) identified as “Otros” with “Subtipo Criterio: 10,” and “Precio” with “Subtipo Criterio: 90.” This shows that price has a much higher relative importance than the testing-cost criterion. However, the “Ponderación” fields for both criteria appear as “0,” while minimum and maximum quantities (10/90 respectively) are listed, which suggests the weighting or scoring scale is defined by formulas in the detailed tender documents (OC‑M‑26005.pdf / PCAP) rather than in this summary. Offers must remain valid for 4 months (“Plazo de Validez de la Oferta 4 Mes(es)”).

On risks and special conditions, the text identifies financial guarantees and subcontracting, but not specific penalties or site visit requirements. Such as: a definitive guarantee of 5% of the contract amount is required (“Garantía Requerida Definitiva Porcentaje 5 %”), plus a complementary guarantee of another 5% (“Garantía Requerida Complementaria Porcentaje 5 %”), significantly increasing the financial risk for the contractor. Maximum advertising costs are capped at 3.000 EUR. Subcontracting is expressly permitted (“Subcontratación permitida”), without further percentages or limits in this excerpt. The question deadline is not explicitly mentioned; instead, a “Plazo de Obtención de Pliegos” and “Plazo de Presentación de Oferta” up to 01/12/2026 at 19:00 are given, with offers submitted electronically via PLACSP to the Dirección General de Carreteras. Penalties for delay, quality defects or other breaches, and any mandatory site visit obligations, would be governed by the “Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas” and any clarifying note (“Nota aclaratoria PCAP obras cláusula 23_vi.pdf”), but they are not spelled out in the provided text.

Finally, contradictions or corrections within the documents: the excerpt shows repeated, near-identical blocks of information coming from “01‑placsp‑3.pdf” and “02‑placsp‑6.pdf,” but no substantive contradiction between them. Such as: the contract value, classification requirement (G4‑3), execution period (3 months), guarantees (5% + 5%), award criteria (10/90 split between testing costs and price), offer validity (4 months), dates for administrative opening (03/12/2026 at 10:00), economic opening (17/12/2026 at 10:00) and offer submission deadline (01/12/2026 at 19:00) are consistently repeated. Where there could appear to be differences (e.g. addresses shown twice or ponderación = 0 while amounts 10 and 90 are given), they look more like formatting artefacts than conflicting rules. In case of any doubt or inconsistency, the applicable statements will be those in the formal tender documents listed (Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas, Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas, OC‑M‑26005.pdf, Nota aclaratoria PCAP obras cláusula 23_vi.pdf), as those are the binding legal documents under Spanish procurement law.