"Organisation of a training and workshop meeting on 17-18.11.2026"

… subject-matter of the contract offered, including all ICT products, ICT services and ICT processes used to perform the contract, does not include: 1) ICT products, ICT services or ICT processes indicated in the recommendation referred to in Art. 4 of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the National Cybersecurity System (Dz. of Laws 2026, item 20 and 252), establishing their negative impact on the essential security interest of the State, 2) an ICT product, the type of which has been specified in the decision on the recognition of the supplier as a high-risk supplier referred to in Article 67b para. 15 of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, or ICT service, or ICT process, specified in this decision. If the Contractor offers the solution referred to in point 1) or 2) above, the tender will be subject to rejection pursuant to Art. 1 point 17) or point 19) of the Public Procurement Act. 4. Deadline for performance of the contract: The Agreement shall apply from the date of its conclusion. The Agreement expires at the end of 3 working days, counting from the date of the end of the Departure, with the Departure being carried out on 17-18 November 2026, subject to the points below. The Ordering Party allows for the possibility of changing the date of the Event only by postponing it to a later date, falling from Monday to Friday, in the period from 19 November 2026 to 2 December 2026 inclusive. The parties will determine the exact date of the trip during a working meeting held within 5 working days after the conclusion of the contract. The Contractor will be obliged to carry out the Trip on the new date indicated by the Ordering Party, without additional remuneration for changing the date. The change in the date of performance of the contract made within the limits set out above does not constitute an amendment to the contract and does not require the conclusion of an annex. . 5. In cases where the detailed description of the subject of the contract indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, which would lead to the privilege or elimination of certain contractors or products, this means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract with sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject of the contract. In such situations, any indications of trade marks, patents, origin, source or specific process must be read with the words ‘or equivalent’. 6. Where reference is made in the description of the subject-matter of the contract to the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Article 101(1) CTMR; 1 point 2 and par. 3 of the Public Procurement Act, the contracting authority in accordance with Article 101 sec. 4 of the Public Procurement Act allows for the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical assessment, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this OTSC, it must be assumed that the words ‘or equivalent’ are used for them. 7. Under the concept of equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority understands such a solution that meets the conditions set out in the SOPZ to an equivalent extent. 8. Wyk