"Organization of the Santa Claus meeting"

… Act of 5 July 2018 on the National Cybersecurity System (Dz. of Laws 2026, item 20 and 252), establishing their negative impact on the essential security interest of the State, 2) an ICT product, the type of which has been specified in the decision on the recognition of the supplier as a high-risk supplier referred to in Article 67b para. 15 of the Act of 5 July 2018 on the national cybersecurity system, or ICT service, or ICT process, specified in this decision. If the Contractor offers the solution referred to in point 1) or 2) above, the tender will be subject to rejection pursuant to Art. 1 point 17) or point 19) of the Public Procurement Act. 5. Deadline for performance of the contract: The contract is valid from the date of conclusion to the date of performance of all the obligations constituting the subject of the contract, no longer than until the expiry of the 14th - ego day counted from the expiry of the date of the Meeting, subject to those provisions of the contract that provide for longer deadlines (e.g. confidentiality period). The meeting will take place on 6 December 2026. 6. In cases where the detailed description of the subject of the contract indicates trademarks, patents, origin, source or a specific process that characterizes products or services provided by a specific Contractor, which would lead to the privilege or elimination of certain contractors or products, this means that the Ordering Party cannot describe the subject of the contract with sufficiently precise terms and this is justified by the specificity of the subject of the contract. In such situations, any indications of trade marks, patents, origin, source or specific process must be read with the words ‘or equivalent’. 7. Where reference is made in the description of the subject-matter of the contract to the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and reference systems referred to in Article 101(1) CTMR; 1 point 2 and par. 3 of the Public Procurement Act, the contracting authority in accordance with Article 101 sec. 4 of the Public Procurement Act allows for the use of equivalent solutions. Whenever a standard, technical assessment, technical specification or technical reference system is indicated in this OTSC, it must be assumed that the words ‘or equivalent’ are used for them. 8. Under the concept of equivalent solutions, the Contracting Authority understands such a solution that meets the conditions set out in the SOPZ to an equivalent extent. 9. The contractor who refers to equivalent solutions described by the contracting authority is obliged to prove in the tender, in particular by means of the means of evidence referred to in Articles 104-107 of the Public Procurement Act, that the solutions proposed by the contractor meet in an equivalent manner the requirements set out in the description of the subject-matter of the contract. The evidence, in particular the means of proof referred to in Articles 104 to 107 of the Public Procurement Act, confirming that the solutions proposed by the Contractor meet in an equivalent manner the requirements set out in the description of the subject-matter of the contract shall not be supplemented. 10. The contracting authority does not allow the possibility of conducting negotiations in order to improve the content of tenders submitted in response to the contract notice. 11. Pursuant to Art. 6-7 of the Act of 13 April 2022 on special solutions in the field of counteracting