Construction of an RDF production hall building with necessary technical infrastructure, including fire protection tanks with a capacity of 1082 m3 and 645 m3.

… integral annex to the Functional and Utility Program (PFU). Due to the general nature of the construction project, the Contractor is required to specify technical solutions within the framework of multi-discipline implementation and technological documentation. The project consists in the execution of complete executive and as-built documentation for all industries and technological projects of machine assembly along with obtaining all the necessary legal arrangements, opinions and permits, providing the necessary materials, equipment, technology and equipment, as well as providing qualified and authorized human resources. The investment shall include in particular: • construction of a technological hall consisting of a preRDF drying module in the form of oxygen stabilization in bioreactors together with a feed preparation hall and a RDF preparation and storage module in the form of a technological line, • construction of a biofilter, • construction of a fire tank with a capacity of 1082 m3, • construction of a fire tank with a capacity of 645 m3, • construction of external water supply, rainwater and power sewage systems, • execution of terrain defects. The Contractor is also obliged to carry out a full technological start-up (both dry and on waste) and obtain, on behalf of the Contracting Authority, a final occupancy permit for the installations and construction works carried out. The detailed scope of work is described in the Functional-Use Program (PFU) 3. Equivalent solutions: 1) If the Ordering Party uses standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Article 101 of the Public Procurement Act in the description of the subject of the contract, they should be understood as examples. Contracting authority in accordance with Art. 4 of the Public Procurement Act allows in any case the application of solutions equivalent to those described in the wording of the ToR. Whenever a standard is referred to in this or the annexes to the ToR, it must be assumed that the words ‘or equivalent’ are used to refer to it. In all places of the ToR and annexes to the ToR where an example of a trademark, patent, origin, source or specific process characterising the products or services provided by a particular Contractor is used, or where the Contracting Authority has described the subject-matter of the contract by reference to the standards, technical assessments, technical specifications and technical reference systems referred to in Art. 1 point 2) and par. 3 PHP, and in any case, acting in accordance with Art. 6 and Article 101(1) CTMR 4 PZP, the Contracting Authority accepts solutions equivalent to those specified in the ToR and in the annexes to the ToR, marking such indications or references with the words ‘or equivalent’ or ‘or equivalent ,’, as appropriate, provided that parameters not inferior to those specified in the description of the subject-matter of the contract are ensured. An equivalent solution is also permissible if the word ‘equivalent’ or ‘equivalent’ is not included in the description of the subject-matter of the contract. Equivalence consists in the possibility of offering the subject of the contract with non-inferior techni parameters