Friedrich & ClementBETA

How to bid in this country: portals, deadlines, thresholds →

Mellora da mobilidade peonil na E.P. 9704 Igrexa de Caleiro, do P.Q. 0+000 ao P.Q. 0+100. Municipality of Vilanova de Arousa

Mellora da mobilidade peonil na E.P. 9704 Igrexa de Caleiro, do P.Q. 0+000 ao P.Q. 0+100. Concello de Vilanova de Arousa — original title

ESSpain · PontevedraBELOW THRESHOLD — NOT ON TED

Your path to submission

  1. Deadline: 18 November at 10:00 — 17 days left.
  2. You submit on PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público — not here and not by e-mail. ↗ Submission via the Plataforma de Contratación (PLACSP): registration plus a recognised digital certificate / eIDAS signature — as an EU bidder, arrange this early; it typically takes days. Sort out account and signature first — not on submission day.
  3. Collect your evidence — use the eligibility analysis on this page: it lists the requirements and, for known certificates, how to get them.
Compiled automatically from notice and documents — no guarantee; the procedure's wording is binding.

Contract

TypeWorks
Estimated value€67,245
Published28 Oct 2026
ProcedureOpen procedure

Type of service

45 · Construction work
CPV 45000000

Clement What the numbers say about this buyer

  • 50% of the bids received came from other countries (313 procedures with a bid mix) — all bidders, not just the winners. Sector: 9%.n = 313
  • In this sector the buyer awards roughly every month (220 awards, most recently October 2026) — the next award is due around December 2026 by that rhythm. The last award went to CONSTRUCCIONES OBRAS Y VIALES, S.A. (COVSA).n = 220
  • The median procedure drew just one bid (3,658 procedures with a bid count); 72% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 3 bids.n = 3,658
  • 59% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (5,067 awards since 2016, spread over 1,932 companies). 41% went to new names.n = 5,067 awards since 2016
  • The award came in at a median 90% of the estimated value (1,842 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually too high here. Sector: 90%.n = 1,842

From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 01/11/2026.

Tender documents at a glance

The essentials of the tender documents, checked statement by statement against the documents. For your bid, the original documents count.

Powered by eBriefing – EU language technology. Friedrich is an independent service, not an EU offering.

✓ found in the documents · ❓ not found in the documents or general statement

Tender for pedestrian mobility improvement works in Pontevedra (Spain)

The input text concerns a Spanish public works tender published on the Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público from the Diputación Provincial de Pontevedra (local authority in Spain).

It presents, from the Spanish contracting authority’s point of view, the basic information on a construction contract to improve pedestrian mobility on a specific provincial road, including value, procedure, and key conditions for bidders.

As background, the documents (01-placsp-3.pdf and 02-placsp-6.pdf) describe an open simplified procedure (“procedimiento abierto simplificado”) for a non-harmonised works contract (“Contrato sujeto a regulación armonizada: No”) in the construction sector (CPV 45000000).

They state the contracting authority (Presidencia de la Diputación Provincial de Pontevedra), its contact data (telephone, fax, email [email protected], postal address in Pontevedra, Spain), and confirm that tendering and submission of offers is done electronically via PLACSP.

The base budget for tender is 81,365.87 EUR including taxes, with an estimated contract value of 67,244.52 EUR (without taxes).

Regarding what the bidder must submit and minimum qualification requirements, the text indicates that there is a single envelope (“SOBRE ÚNICO”) containing documentation administrativa and criteria “cuantificables automáticamente”.

As such, bidders must provide administrative documentation proving: capacity to act (“Capacidad de obrar”), absence of prohibition to contract (“No prohibición para contratar”), no incompatibilities (“No estar incurso en incompatibilidades”), and compliance with social security and tax obligations (“Cumplimiento con las obligaciones con la Seguridad Social” and “Cumplimiento con las obligaciones tributarias”).

The detailed forms, references, turnover, insurance and certificates are not spelled out in this extract; they are likely contained in the “Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas” and “Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas” referenced, but not reproduced here.

The text does, however, mention optional commitments such as applying a quality management system (UNE‑EN ISO 9001 or equivalent) and an environmental management system (UNE‑EN ISO 14001 or equivalent), which implies submission of corresponding certificates or equivalent evidence if the bidder wants to benefit from these evaluation criteria.

Concerning the scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the object is clearly defined as “Mellora da mobilidade peonil na E.P. 9704 Igrexa de Caleiro, do P.Q. 0+000 ao P.Q. 0+100.

Concello de Vilanova de Arousa”.

Thus, the works relate to pedestrian mobility improvements on the provincial road EP‑9704, between kilometre points 0+000 and 0+100, within the municipality of Vilanova de Arousa in the province of Pontevedra, Spain.

Show all 24 statements

The estimated value is 67,244.52 EUR (without taxes) and the tender budget is 81,365.87 EUR (including taxes).

The place of performance is identified as “Subentidad Nacional Pontevedra, Código ES114, Dirección Postal España”, and the execution period is three months (“Plazo de Ejecución 3 Mes(es)”) from contract start; the exact start date is not in the extract but will derive from contract signature.

As to award criteria and weighting, the documents list “Criterios evaluables mediante aplicación de fórmulas”.

These include, such as: (1) “Menor Precio ofertado” (lowest price) classified as “Precio”, with a quantitative value of 75 (which functions as its weighting in the overall score); (2) “Ampliación de porcentaje de Control de Calidad” (increase of percentage of quality control) with a value of 10; (3) “Ampliación del plazo de garantía exigido” (extension of the required guarantee period) also with a value of 10; (4) “Compromiso de aplicar un sistema de control de calidad o equivalente (UNE‑EN ISO 9001 o equivalente)” with 2.5; and (5) “Compromiso de aplicar un sistema de control medioambiental (UNE‑EN ISO 14001 o equivalente)” with 2.5.

Although the text mechanically repeats “Ponderación: 0” and “Cantidad mínima/máxima”, these numeric entries (75, 10, 10, 2.5, 2.5) clearly represent the relative weights or maximum points each criterion contributes to the overall evaluation.

On risks and special conditions, the extract explicitly confirms that subcontracting is permitted (“Subcontratación permitida”), which reduces some operational risk for bidders who may rely on specialist subcontractors.

It also states that there is no European Union funding (“No hay financiación con fondos de la UE”).

However, specific penalties (e.g. delay penalties), performance guarantees, bid validity period, question deadlines, and mandatory site visits are not detailed in the provided text; they are almost certainly set out in the “Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas” and “Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas” referenced.

Time-related conditions disclosed here include: deadline for obtaining the tender documents and for submitting offers, both “Hasta el 18/11/2026 a las 10:00”, and opening of economic offers on 19/11/2026 at 10:00, as a private act (“Tipo de Acto: Privado”), at the Presidencia de la Diputación Provincial de Pontevedra.

Regarding contradictions or corrections within the documents, the content of 01‑placsp‑3.pdf and 02‑placsp‑6.pdf is essentially identical and appears to cross‑reference each other.

The object, values, execution period, place of performance, conditions of admission, type of envelope, and award criteria are repeated consistently.

The unusual notation “Ponderación: 0” next to each criterion seems to be a platform artefact rather than a real indication that criteria have zero weight; given the simultaneous indication of values (75, 10, 10, 2.5, 2.5) and their typical use in Spanish tenders, the applicable interpretation is that those numeric values are the effective weight/points, and no contradiction arises between the documents on this point.

Add your company details — we'll show whether you meet turnover, insurance and reference requirements →

Only the contracting authority's tender documents are binding. As of: 30/10/2026

Clement
References and certificates from your home country count fully across the EU — that is what European procurement law is for.
Anything unclear? Bidder questions are your right — ask in writing, the answer goes to everyone.

Eligibility analysis from the tender documents

Tender documents — direct download

⤓
PCAP_def.pdf
Legal document
⤓
Proxecto Vilanova.pdf
Technical specification

Who has won at this buyer so far

Across all contract types of this buyer — not just this sector. A city buys software and fire engines through the same purchasing office.

CompanyAwardsPeriod
ATENEA SEGURIDAD Y MEDIO AMBIENTE, S. A. U. · MADRID992020–2026
Aquatica Ingenieria Civil S.L.902020–2026
INGENIERÍA Y PREVENCIÓN DE RIESGOS, S.L.482020–2024
FARO DE VIGO S.A.U.482018–2026
J&A Garrigues, S.L.P.412019–2025
From the recorded awards · regular winners know this buyer's requirements — that is your competition.

How often this buyer tenders this kind of work

48
2023
50
2024
39
2025
88
2026
225 procedures in this category since 2019. Public procurement repeats itself — those who know the rhythm prepare instead of reacting.

Contracting authority contact

·
Deadline — Wednesday 18 November at 10:00

Tactics

When this buyer has awarded in this sector, usually about 3 bids came in. A normal field for this market. (Based on 39 completed awards — not a statement about this procedure.)

This procedure allows 21 days between publication and deadline — typical in this country is 26 (median of 7,730 procedures). A normal window for this market.

Foreign bidders

In Spain · Construction work, 90 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 100,814 recorded awards) — mostly from Portugal, Italy, France.

Measured from linked award data; foreign winners bidding through a local subsidiary count as domestic — the true share is higher.

How to bid

Guide: how to apply on PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público (Spanien) → Registration, signature, fees — from the operator's bidder manual.

Read the full notice — Original + documents
Goes directly to this tender on PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público. The full specification and all annexes are there.
Put together the evidence
Certificates, references and your price — as set out in the notice.
Submit via PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público before the deadline
Electronic submission — allow time for the portal registration the first time.
To the procurement portal →
We pull data from millions of notices. If the link here does not work, report it — we will find the right one.

Don't miss the next one

Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, each one checked by Claude (Anthropic) for fit, and he learns from your feedback what your company really does.

Register now