OC-LU-26003; 51.831/26 Reform of intersection N-642 and LU-152. Highway N-642, P.K. 30+400. T.M. Foz. Province of Lugo

✓Carretera N‑642, P.K. 30+400. T.M. Foz. Provincia de Lugo”.

✓The works consist basically in transforming the current intersection into a roundabout‑type solution: such as implementing a central deceleration and waiting lane on N‑642 for left turns to LU‑152, a central lane for acceleration and incorporation from LU‑152 to N‑642 toward Foz, a “semiglorieta” at the confluence of LU‑152 with N‑642, and an island to channel right‑turn movements from a nearby access road to N‑642 toward Ribadeo.

✓Financially, the contract has an estimated value of 422.824,18 € (before VAT), a base tender budget of 511.617,26 € (including 21% VAT), broken down into execution material, general expenses (13%) and industrial profit (6%).

✓The execution period is 4 months, and the place of performance is the province of Lugo (Subentidad Nacional ES112), with telematic administrative handling from Madrid.

✓Concerning award criteria and weighting, the procedure is “abierto con varios criterios de adjudicación, todos evaluables mediante fórmulas, ninguno mediante juicio de valor”, justified under LCSP articles 116.4, 131, 145, 149‑152 and 156‑158.

✓The XML/listing of criteria shows two formula‑based criteria in Sobre 2: such as “Precio” (price) with 90 units and “Incremento de gastos de ensayos” (increase in testing costs) with 10 units.

⚠Although the snippet repeats “Ponderación: 0”, the “Cantidad mínima/máxima” values of 90 and 10 respectively indicate a weighting of 90% for price and 10% for the testing‑cost criterion; the detailed PCAP and its “Cuadro de Características” would clarify the exact scoring formula.

✓There are no qualitative criteria assessed by value judgment, and all evaluation is automatic based on formulas applied to the economic offer.

✓On risks and special conditions, the text highlights several important aspects.

✓Firstly, the contract is subject to guarantees: such as a definitive guarantee of 5% of the contract amount and a complementary guarantee of an additional 5%, as stated under “Garantía requerida definitiva” and “Garantía requerida complementaria”.

✓Subcontracting is explicitly “permitida”, subject to LCSP rules and PCAP conditions.

✓The tender is processed as “tramitación anticipada del gasto”, and the PCAP includes a condition suspending adjudication/formalisation until there is adequate budget credit (condition suspensiva), which is a financial‑legal risk for bidders as the award may depend on the approval of the 2027 budget.

✓Also, the validity period of the offer is 4 months (“Plazo de validez de la oferta 4 Mes(es)”), and the acts of opening offers (administrative envelope on 23/11/2026, economic envelope on 30/11/2026) are private acts held telematically at the Ministry in Madrid.

❓The text mentions standard recourse possibilities before the Tribunal Administrativo Central de Recursos Contractuales, in line with articles 44 and 50 LCSP; penalties, specific performance conditions, insurance obligations, and site‑visit requirements would be detailed in the PCAP and PPT, but are not spelled out in the excerpt.

❓No explicit question deadline beyond the general “Plazo de obtención de pliegos” (20/11/2026 15:00) is mentioned in the provided text.

✓Regarding contradictions or corrections within the documents, the reproduced content is largely consistent: such as identical values for the estimated contract amount, budget, execution period, procedure type, classification requirement, and scheduling of envelope openings across the different PDF/TXT extracts.

✓Likewise, while one administrative note emphasises “tramitación anticipada” for the expenditure and another listing mentions “Tramitación ordinaria” for the procedure, these are distinct concepts in Spanish procurement: the expenditure is processed in advance (anticipada), whereas the procedure itself is not urgent (“Tramitación del procedimiento: Ordinaria / Urgente”), so both statements are compatible and the PCAP/expediente clarify that the applicable regime is ordinary procedure with anticipated expenditure.