How to bid in this country: portals, deadlines, thresholds →
Dynamic purchasing system for works
Sistema dinámico de adquisición de obras — original title
Your path to submission
- Deadline for requests to participate: 1 April 2029 at 23:59 — 883 days left. Two-stage procedure: by this deadline you submit a request to participate (proof of eligibility). Only shortlisted firms are then invited to submit a tender.
- You submit on PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público — not here and not by e-mail. ↗ Submission via the Plataforma de Contratación (PLACSP): registration plus a recognised digital certificate / eIDAS signature — as an EU bidder, arrange this early; it typically takes days. Sort out account and signature first — not on submission day.
- Collect your evidence — use the eligibility analysis on this page: it lists the requirements and, for known certificates, how to get them.
Contract
Type of service
Clement What the numbers say about this buyer
- In this sector the buyer awards roughly every 2 months (36 awards, most recently October 2025) — by that rhythm the next award was due around December 2025. The last award went to ELECTRICIDAD FERYSAN, S. A.n = 36
- The median procedure drew just one bid (3,655 procedures with a bid count); 100% ended with a single bidder. Sector: median 3 bids.n = 3,655
- 55% of this buyer's awards went to companies that had already won here before (4,049 awards since 2012, spread over 890 companies). 45% went to new names.n = 4,049 awards since 2012
- The award came in at a median 85% of the estimated value (241 awards with both estimate and value) — pricing at the estimate is usually too high here. Sector: 90%.n = 241
- Not one of the 4,049 awards with a known winner country has gone to a foreign company so far. Sector average: 0%.n = 4,049
From this buyer's documented awards; comparison values from the same sector and country. Not a forecast, not legal advice. As of 01/11/2026.
Tender documents at a glance
The essentials of the tender documents, checked statement by statement against the documents. For your bid, the original documents count.
Powered by eBriefing – EU language technology. Friedrich is an independent service, not an EU offering.
✓ found in the documents · ❓ not found in the documents or general statement
Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición de Obras del Ayuntamiento de Xirivella
The input text deals with the creation and functioning of a “Sistema Dinámico de Adquisición de obras” (SDA) for the Ayuntamiento de Xirivella, a local authority in Spain.
It is drafted from the Spanish legal and administrative point of view, explicitly referring to Spanish legislation (Ley 9/2017 de Contratos del Sector Público – LCSP, Ley 7/1985 de Bases de Régimen Local) and Spanish institutions (Tribunal Administrativo Central de Recursos Contractuales, FNMT, etc.).
No other countries are mentioned; however there is reference to publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, which situates the procedure within the EU public procurement framework but still under Spanish contracting authority perspective.
As background, the SDA is described as a technique of rationalization of public procurement for construction works, not as a single contract but as a framework through which many specific works contracts will later be awarded.
The resolutions of January and June 2026 approve the SDA, its administrative and technical specifications and the adhesion of a list of companies.
The text constantly cites LCSP articles 218, 223–226, 161, 162 and 326 to explain that the SDA remains open to new companies, follows in what is not specifically regulated the rules of the restricted procedure, and requires the intervention of a contracting committee (Mesa de Contratación) for adhesion and subsequent specific tenders.
Regarding what bidders must submit and the minimum qualification requirements, the input text indicates that companies must present a “solicitud de adhesión” within a thirty‑day period (extendable under the PCAP) and provide documentation that accredits their capacity and solvency.
As such, it mentions that capacity to contract will be assessed “de conformidad con la cláusula 6 del PCAP” and exclusion grounds according to national rules (LCSP).
For technical‑professional solvency, it states that “Trabajos realizados” are required, and for economic‑financial solvency the “Cifra anual de negocio” is required, both with thresholds depending on the specific subcategory requested, “de conformidad con la cláusula 7 del PCAP.” It also shows that some firms were required to correct documentation and, having failed to do so, their applications were considered withdrawn, which exemplifies the importance of complete and correct administrative documentation.
Details on forms, insurance or certificates are not spelled out in the excerpt but are repeatedly deferred to the PCAP (Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas Particulares).
Concerning the scope of the contract (what, how much, where, when), the input text describes the SDA’s object as the adjudication of works contracts (OBRAS) for the Ayuntamiento de Xirivella, grouped into CPV‑based categories 1 to 4, such as: preparation of land (45100000), general construction and civil engineering (45200000), building installations (45300000) and finishing of buildings (45400000).
Each category is divided into three subcategories according to estimated value (such as “inferior a 80.000 euros”, “entre 80.000 e inferior a 500.000 euros”, “igual o superior a 500.000 euros”), and category 3 requires official contractor classification for works above 500,000 euros.
Show all 23 statements
The global estimated value of the SDA is set at 5,000,000 EUR, and the place of performance is specified as Valencia/València (territorial code ES523, Spain).
As for timing, the SDA itself is approved for two years with up to two one‑year extensions, while another notice describes a “Plazo de Ejecución” from 01/04/2026 to 01/04/2029, reflecting the overall operational period of the system.
Regarding award criteria and risks or special conditions, the input text indicates that in this SDA and in its specific contracts “criterios evaluables mediante aplicación de fórmulas” will be used, with the economic offer (price) as the evaluable criterion; however, in the summary extracted, price appears with “Ponderación: 0”, suggesting that exact weighting may be clarified in the PCAP or in the specific derived contracts.
It states that specific contracts under the SDA will include their own technical specifications, and that criteria for adjudication of each derived contract will be set in a complementary document.
It also mentions that the SDA and derived contracts will include special social considerations “de conformidad con la cláusula 18 del PCAP”, that subcontracting is allowed, and that no electronic ordering, e‑invoicing or e‑payment will be used.
As such, the text refers to a minimum number of candidates (5) to be invited, indicates that no electronic auction will be used, and explains that companies adhering to the SDA must keep their circumstances updated and accept the adhesion unless they express opposition within five business days.
Penalties, performance guarantees, or site visits are not detailed in the excerpt and appear to be left to the PCAP and each project’s technical specifications.
Finally, concerning contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text itself explains that where the LCSP’s specific rules on dynamic purchasing systems (arts. 223 and following) do not regulate a point, the rules of the restricted procedure apply.
It also clarifies an apparent conceptual contradiction in LCSP regarding competence: since the SDA is not a contract but a rationalization technique, the competence to approve it is assigned to the Mayor under the residual clause of the Local Government Act, rather than the rules applicable to contracts in the LCSP.
As such, the documents reconcile the fact that the SDA has a “valor estimado global” of 5,000,000 EUR and a defined duration but is not itself a contract; instead, specific contracts under it will require their own technical specifications and complementary administrative documents.
Any more detailed contradictions (for example about exact duration dates or weighting of price) are not resolved explicitly in the provided text and are repeatedly referred back to the PCAP clauses (3.1, 6, 7, 8, 18), which are presented as the governing reference when statements in notices or resolutions are ambiguous.
Only the contracting authority's tender documents are binding. As of: 20/10/2026
Eligibility analysis from the tender documents
Who has won at this buyer so far
Across all contract types of this buyer — not just this sector. A city buys software and fire engines through the same purchasing office.
| Company | Awards | Period |
|---|---|---|
| Mantenimientos y servicios integrales Nafer SLU | 62 | 2018–2022 |
| IMPRESSOS RAF SL | 56 | 2018–2024 |
| METALCO.S.A · ALACANT | 45 | 2018–2019 |
| Diteco Sa Distribuidores Tecnicos | 44 | 2018 |
| Castevila Distribuciones, S.L. · LORIGUILLA-VALÈNCIA | 42 | 2018–2025 |
How often this buyer tenders this kind of work
Tactics
When contracts were awarded in this country and sector, usually about 3 bids came in. A normal field for this market. (Based on 17,996 completed awards — not a statement about this procedure.)
This procedure allows 1013 days between publication and deadline — typical in this country is 26 (median of 7,730 procedures). Much more generous than usual — time for a thorough bid rather than a quick one.
Foreign bidders
In Spain · Construction work, 90 contracts went to foreign companies over the last 3 years (of 100,814 recorded awards) — mostly from Portugal, Italy, France.
How to bid
Guide: how to apply on PLACSP — Plataforma de Contratación del Sector Público (Spanien) → Registration, signature, fees — from the operator's bidder manual.
Don't miss the next one
Friedrich finds tenders like this for you — every morning at 7:30, each one checked by Claude (Anthropic) for fit, and he learns from your feedback what your company really does.
Register now