Friedrich & ClementBETA

Soumissionner dans ce pays : portails, délais, seuils →

Accord-cadre pluriannuel de services relatif à l’accès à une base de données économiques et financières nationales au profit de la Police Intégrée

BEBelgique · Bruxelles

Votre chemin vers le dépôt

  1. Échéance : 3 novembre à 10:00 — encore 2 jours.
  2. Le dépôt se fait sur BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — pas ici, pas par e-mail. ↗
  3. Offre et justificatifs en : français, néerlandais.
  4. Réunissez vos justificatifs — utilisez l'analyse d'éligibilité sur cette page : elle liste les exigences et le chemin d'obtention des attestations connues.
Assemblé automatiquement depuis l'avis et le dossier — sans garantie ; seul le libellé du marché fait foi.

Ce que recherche l'acheteur

Meerjarige raamovereenkomst voor diensten met betrekking tot de toegang tot een nationale economische en financiële databank ten behoeve van de Geïntegreerde Politie

Description telle que publiée (FR).

Marché

TypeServices
Montant estimémontant non publié
Publié le22 oct. 2026
ProcédureProcédure ouverte
Accord-cadre

Type de prestation

72 · Services informatiques
CPV 72320000

Clement Ce que les chiffres disent de cet acheteur

  • Dans ce secteur, l'acheteur attribue environ tous les 4 mois (12 attributions, la dernière en juin 2026) — à ce rythme, la prochaine était attendue vers septembre 2026. La dernière attribution est allée à SYNTELLIGEN.n = 12
  • En médiane, 3 offres par procédure (93 procédures avec nombre d'offres) ; 25 % se sont terminées avec un seul candidat. Secteur : 5 offres en médiane.n = 93
  • 22 % des attributions de cet acheteur sont allées à des entreprises qui avaient déjà gagné ici (142 attributions depuis 2024, réparties sur 111 entreprises). 78 % sont allées à de nouveaux noms.n = 142 attributions depuis 2024
  • L'attribution s'est faite en médiane à 85 % de la valeur estimée (13 attributions avec estimation et montant) — calculer sur l'estimation est ici le plus souvent trop haut. Secteur : 84 %.n = 13
  • 33 % des attributions sont allées à des entreprises étrangères (142 attributions au pays du titulaire connu). Moyenne du secteur : 29 %.n = 142

À partir des attributions documentées de cet acheteur ; valeurs de comparaison du même secteur et du même pays. Ni prévision, ni conseil juridique. Au 01/11/2026.

Le dossier de consultation en bref

L'essentiel du dossier de consultation, vérifié point par point dans les documents. Pour votre offre, seuls les documents originaux font foi.

Propulsé par eBriefing – technologie linguistique de l'UE. Friedrich est un service indépendant, pas une offre de l'UE.

✓ figure dans les documents · ❓ introuvable dans les documents ou indication générale · Disponible en anglais.

Access to a National Economic and Financial Database for the Belgian Federal Police

The input text concerns a Belgian public procurement procedure for a multi‑year framework agreement for services giving access to a national economic and financial database for the Integrated Police (Federale/Police Fédérale).

It is drafted from the point of view of Belgium as contracting authority, with references to EU law and EU sanctions (notably against Russia).

The applicable legal framework explicitly cites Belgian public procurement legislation (law of 17 June 2016, AR1 of 18 April 2017, AR2 of 14 January 2013) and EU regulations, and deals with both Dutch and French language versions of the tender documents.

The text first sets out the background and legal basis of the contract.

It clarifies that the procedure is an open procedure for a morejarige raamovereenkomst / accord‑cadre pluriannuel.

The contracting authority is the Federale Politie / Police Fédérale, specifically the Finance Directorate, Service Procurement, with DGJ (Federal Judicial Police) as user.

The legislations on data protection, worker welfare, and general rules of execution (AR2) apply.

It also emphasises that the framework agreement has a maximum value and estimated quantities and that, in line with EU case law, the agreement ceases to have effect once those maxima are reached.

Regarding what the bidder must submit and minimum qualification requirements, the text prescribes a structured offer file divided into chapters.

Such as: Chapter 1 “Administratieve offerte en prijsofferte” requires the completed administrative offer and price form (Annex A), the inventory (Annex A/1), and proof of signing authority (coordinated articles of association, company deeds, and any powers of attorney).

Chapter 2 “Dossier voor de selectie” requires the European Single Procurement Document (UEA/DUME in XML and PDF), and, if electronic checks are not available, recent certificates for social security contributions and tax debts.

Where the bidder relies on other entities’ economic/financial capacity, each such entity must submit documents on exclusion grounds and selection criteria, its statutes, powers of attorney, a separate UEA and an “Engagementsverklaring van terbeschikkingstelling van financiële middelen” (Annex E).

Afficher les 76 éléments

Minimum economic and financial capacity is defined as a specific average annual turnover of at least 100,000 EUR in the activity related to the contract over the last three financial years, to be declared in Part IV, Section B of the UEA.

Technical information (Chapter 4) must reproduce and respect all technical clauses in Annex B, and a price structure (Annex C) must be provided for each lot/post.

Optional documentation can be added in Chapter 5. The bidder must also implicitly and explicitly declare compliance with EU sanctions against Russia (Regulation 833/2014 as amended) and basic ILO conventions, human rights and child labour rules throughout the supply chain, and renounce its own general sales/service/guarantee conditions for this framework agreement.

The scope of the contract is defined in terms of what, how much, where, and when.

Such as: the object is access to a national economic and financial database, plus training and documentation, for the Integrated Police.

The contract is “tegen prijslijst” / “contre prix unitaires” and not divided into lots due to functional unity between access, training and documentation.

An erratum clarifies that the 260 accesses already cover the four‑year duration; there is no further multiplication by four, and for comparison of offers the price is: comparison price (excl.

VAT) = (unit price annual access × 260) + (unit price training/documentation × 2).

The place of performance / delivery is the Federale Gerechtelijke Politie (DGJ), Koningsstraat/Rue Royale 202A, 1000 Brussels.

The contract starts the day after the notification letter and ends on the last day of the quarter preceding expiry of the fourth year, with the exact end date specified in the notification.

The framework can be annually terminated by the authority at the end of the civil year with 2‑month notice, without indemnity, and may be extended to secure continuity (up to four years plus possible 12‑month continuity extension).

Award criteria and weighting are clearly specified for determination of the economically most advantageous tender.

Such as: the contract is awarded on the basis of best price‑quality ratio (Art. 81 of the law).

The rank‑1 criteria and their weights are: Price (60 points), Information (20 points), Visualisation of ratios (20 points).

The price score uses a specific formula based on each offer’s price (Px), the minimum price (PMin), and the arithmetic mean (Pgem / Pmoyen), with the remark that if an offer’s price exceeds 2×Pgem its price score is zero.

Non‑price criteria are scored separately and added to form the final score.

The text also sets out risks and special conditions for bidders and contractors.

Execution is subject to AR2 rules: performance must respect “regels van de kunst” / “règles de l’art”; services are not accepted on Saturdays, Sundays, public holidays, and statutory paid vacation/compensatory days; execution deadlines are suspended for the contractor’s annual closure periods specified in the offer, and for authority‑ordered suspensions where certain conditions are met.

The authority can perform price investigations under Art. 84 of the law; bidders must supply detailed price structure information and accept accounting controls as per Annex D. Electronic invoicing is mandatory, and prescriptions on verification, partial/final acceptance, guarantees, modifications (including de minimis changes, non‑substantial changes, unforeseen circumstances and additional services) and possible contract termination are described.

On subcontracting, guarantees, and other special obligations, the text imposes several risk‑related conditions.

Such as: subcontracting is allowed but subject to constraints if the bidder relied on specific subcontractors’ capacities for qualitative selection, or if certain subcontractors are imposed by the authority.

The bidder must indicate in the offer which part of the contract it intends to subcontract and the identity and nationality of subcontractors and manufacturers; if subcontractors are not yet known, their identity must be communicated at the latest the day before they start work.

Any new subcontractor requires prior approval by the authority, which may verify exclusion grounds down the subcontracting chain and demand replacement.

Subcontract agreements must contain a clause allowing unilateral termination if the subcontractor is the subject of a notification under Social Penal Code Articles 49/1 or 49/2 (serious underpayment or illegal third‑country workers), with monthly reporting obligations.

There are also explicit clauses on conflicts of interest and revolving‑door restrictions prohibiting reliance on former internal Federal Police staff within two years of leaving.

Site visits are not described, but bidders must use the e‑Procurement forum for questions, which is open until 2 October 2026 and then closes; the opening of tenders initially set at 23 October 2026 is postponed by erratum to 3 November 2026.

The bidder’s offer is binding until 31 March 2027; any modification or withdrawal must be made via a new, validly signed submission report, otherwise the original offer remains fully in force.

Finally, the documents address contradictions and corrections within the tender.

Such as: an erratum of 20 October 2026 (in both NL and FR) corrects §8.1 on price calculations by deleting the words “te vermenigvuldigen met het aantal jaren” / “à multiplier par le nombre d’années” and clarifying that the comparison price uses 260 accesses (already covering 4 years) plus 2 training/documentation units.

Where discrepancies exist between earlier versions and the erratum, the erratum prevails.

Variants and options (required, authorised, or free) are explicitly not allowed: no variants and no options can be submitted.

If the authority stops the procedure, bidders have no right to compensation.

Overall, where conflicting statements appear between the base bestek/CSC and later corrections, the latest erratum (notably on quantities and price comparison) is the applicable statement.

Answers on the required criteria

Must securities be provided (bid bond, performance or warranty guarantee)? If so: which, in what amount and by when?

Regarding securities, such as bid bonds or performance/warranty guarantees, the text specifies that a *global performance guarantee (borgtocht/cautionnement)* is mandatory for the framework agreement.

As such, the guarantee is fixed at 3% of the estimated amount excluding VAT for the Federal Police, calculated on the estimated quantities over the total duration of the framework.

It must be constituted by the awarded supplier within 30 calendar days starting the day after dispatch of the notification letter and must be unconditional.

As such, acceptable forms are: (i) cash deposit with the Belgian Deposito‑ en Consignatiekas/Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations via e‑DEPO (with a specific procedure for foreign firms), (ii) an act of joint and several surety lodged at that institution through a recognised financial institution, or (iii) a bank guarantee via a recognised credit institution or insurance company (recognised by FSMA) sent to the contracting authority.

The text does not impose a separate bid bond and does not describe an additional “warranty guarantee” beyond this performance guarantee.

The guarantee is released in full at the latest after definitive acceptance of all services.

Is subcontracting allowed? If so: with which limits and which disclosure duties?

As to subcontracting, it is expressly *allowed* but tightly regulated.

As such, the tenderer may use subcontractors under their sole responsibility and must indicate in the offer which part of the contract will be subcontracted and the identity of proposed subcontractors.

If subcontractors are not yet known at offer stage, their identity must be communicated in writing to the leading service at the latest the day before the start of the subcontracted performance.

Free choice of subcontractors is *not* allowed where the tenderer relied on the capacities of predetermined subcontractors for qualitative selection (qualifications/experience) or where the contracting authority has imposed the use of specific subcontractors; in these cases, their identity must be stated in the offer.

Any later use of other subcontractors requires prior approval of the contracting authority.

The contractor must promptly inform the authority of any changes and new subcontractors, accepts that the authority may check exclusion grounds for any subcontractor in the chain and demand replacements, and must insert in subcontract agreements a clause allowing unilateral termination if the subcontractor is notified under Social Penal Code articles 49/1 or 49/2 (serious underpayment or employment of illegally staying third‑country nationals).

There is also a duty of continuous monitoring and monthly reporting to the leading service when a subcontractor is in default.

Is there a site visit, and is attendance mandatory? If so: when?

On site visits, the provided text does not mention any scheduled site visit, inspection visit, or premises tour linked to the submission of tenders, nor any obligation to attend such a visit.

As such, based solely on the input, there is no foreseen site visit and no indication that attendance would be mandatory.

In which language must the tender and the supporting documents be submitted, and are documents in other languages accepted?

Concerning language requirements, the tender must be drafted entirely *either* in French *or* in Dutch, to the exclusion of any other language.

As such, the technical part may be in either French or Dutch as well.

Supporting documents that are needed for, for example, the grant of an advance payment and that are in another language than Dutch or French must be accompanied by a certified translation into one of these two languages.

How long is the bidder bound by the tender (validity period), and is there a deadline for bidder questions? If so: until when?

On tender validity and bidder questions, the tenderer is bound by their offer (as possibly corrected by the contracting authority) until *31 March 2027*.

As such, questions from bidders must be submitted through the forum on the e‑Procurement/publicprocurement.be platform.

The latest date to submit questions is *2 October 2026*; the forum is subject to a closing date, usually set one month before the opening of the offers, after which no new questions can be asked.

Answers are published via the same forum.

Further details

Public procurement conditions for a multi‑year framework agreement of the Belgian Federal Police

The input text is a Belgian special tender specification and erratum for a four‑year framework agreement for services (access to a national economic and financial database, plus training and documentation) for the Federale Politie/Police fédérale.

It reflects the legal and procedural requirements of Belgian public procurement law (KB1, KB2, Belgian “wet” on public procurement) and refers to EU sanctions rules and International Labour Organization conventions.

The country perspective is clearly Belgium, with references to Belgian institutions (Federale Politie, FOD BOSA, Deposito‑ en Consignatiekas/Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, FSMA) and EU law.

As background, the text sets out how offers must be submitted electronically via the Belgian e‑Procurement platform, how selection and exclusion criteria are applied (through the European Single Procurement Document/UEA/DUME), and how social, fiscal and ethical compliance is checked (social security debts, tax debts, ILO conventions, child labour, EU sanctions on Russia).

It also describes the nature of the framework agreement (single lot, functionally indivisible services, maximum value 274,500 EUR excl.

VAT, four‑year duration with possible extensions and early termination options) and the gunning criteria based on the best price‑quality ratio.

The digital offer documents must be in a format readable with common office software (MS Office, Adobe PDF, etc.), and all offer components (inventory, UEA/DUME, annexes) are signed globally via a qualified electronic signature on the submission report.

Any modification or withdrawal of the offer must be done via a new, duly signed submission report; an invalid signature leads to nullity of the modification/withdrawal and the original offer remains fully valid.

Complétez les informations de votre entreprise — nous indiquerons si vous remplissez les exigences de chiffre d'affaires, d'assurance et de références →

Seuls les documents de l'acheteur font foi. Mis à jour: 30/10/2026

Clement
Sur les 10 derniers marchés comparables de cet acheteur (même secteur), une seule offre arrivait le plus souvent — une offre solide a de vraies chances.

Critères de sélection — dans les documents de la consultation

L'acheteur indique dans l'avis que les critères de sélection figurent dans les documents de la consultation (lien sur cette page), pas dans le formulaire européen. L'analyse des documents ci-dessous les en extrait — offre et justificatifs en Français, Néerlandais.

Analyse d'éligibilité à partir du dossier

Documents de la consultation — téléchargement direct

⤓
Annexe 1
Cahier des charges et annexes chez l'acheteur — généralement consultables sans inscription
⤓
Conditions administratives
L'avis complet, texte officiel

Qui a déjà gagné chez cet acheteur

Tous types de marchés de cet acheteur confondus — pas seulement ce secteur. Une ville achète logiciels et véhicules d'incendie au même service achats.

EntrepriseAttributionsPériode
Kose Cleaning42025–2026
VDP SAFETY42024–2026
Falcon Tactical Solutions32025–2026
DataExpert B.V.32025–2026
DELPAC INTERNATIONAL32024–2025
D'après les attributions recensées · les lauréats réguliers connaissent les exigences de cet acheteur — c'est votre concurrence.

À quelle fréquence cet acheteur lance ce type de marché

8
2024
17
2025
16
2026
41 procédures dans cette catégorie depuis 2019. La commande publique se répète — qui connaît le rythme se prépare au lieu de réagir.

Contact de l'acheteur

·
Date limite — mardi 3 novembre à 10:00

Tactique

Lorsque cet acheteur a attribué des marchés dans ce secteur, il n'y avait le plus souvent qu'une seule offre. Une offre solide a ici de vraies chances. (D'après 10 attributions terminées — aucune indication sur cette procédure.)

Cette procédure laisse 12 jours entre la publication et la date limite — l'usage dans ce pays est de 34 (médiane de 3 233 procédures). Nettement plus court que d'habitude : la première semaine compte.

Soumissionnaires étrangers

En Belgique · Services informatiques, 537 marchés ont été remportés par des entreprises étrangères sur 3 ans (sur 2 133 attributions recensées) — principalement : France, Allemagne, Luxembourg.

Langue de l'offre : Français, Néerlandais.

Mesuré sur les attributions liées ; un lauréat étranger passant par une filiale locale compte comme national — la part réelle est plus élevée.

Comment candidater

Lire l'avis complet — Original + documents
Mène directement à cette procédure sur TED — Tenders Electronic Daily. Le cahier des charges et toutes les annexes s'y trouvent.
Cette procédure est publiée sur 2 portails
Le dépôt se fait sur BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — TED publie le même avis, généralement avec un cahier des charges plus détaillé. Lisez les deux.
TEDAvisBDA / e-Procurement BelgiumPortail de dépôt
Réunir les justificatifs — en Français, Néerlandais
Certificats, références et votre prix — selon l'avis.
Dépôt via TED — Tenders Electronic Daily avant la date limite
Dépôt électronique — prévoyez du temps pour l'inscription au portail la première fois.
Vers le portail →Avis officiel sur TED →
Nous collectons des millions d’avis. Si le lien ne fonctionne pas, signalez-le — nous trouverons le bon.

Ne manquez pas le prochain

Friedrich trouve des marchés comme celui-ci pour vous — chaque matin à 7 h 30, chacun vérifié par Claude (Anthropic), et il apprend de vos retours ce que fait vraiment votre entreprise.

S'inscrire maintenant