26-077260 Equipement technique M

Such as described in the contract (Vertrag Nr. 26‑077260 D VII.11.H) and the project description, the scope of the contract covers specialist planning for machines (Anlagengruppen 1, 2, 3, 8 per HOAI) for the refurbishment and upgrading of two listed villas (KS and KR) at Prinzregentenufer 41 and 45 in Nürnberg. The place of performance is Nürnberg (NUTS DE254) and the estimated value is 357,142.86 € net. The services are commissioned in performance stages (Leistungsstufen 1–4), with stufenweise Beauftragung: LS 1 is commissioned on contract signature, further stages are optional and may be called off later or restricted to partial services. The contract specifies key dates, such as submission of HU‑Bau by 30.12.2027, project planning documents by 26.04.2029, construction start on 07.09.2029, start of commissioning on 11.08.2031 and substantial completion by 14.05.2032; the overall project duration in the TED notice runs from 25.01.2027 to 21.03.2036.

Such as laid out in Formblatt III.16.1 and the TED excerpt, award criteria combine quality and price. The total weighting is 70 % for qualitative criteria and 30 % for price. The qualitative criteria are subdivided into: (1) auftragsbezogenes Organisationskonzept (19 %), (2) auftragsbezogene Qualifikation und Erfahrung der Projektmitarbeiter (19 %), (3) Konzept zum Ablauf der Planungsphase (13 %), (4) Konzept zum Ablauf der Baudurchführungsphase (19 %), and (6) Lösungsvorschlag (weight shown as 0 % in the table, suggesting no effective weighting). Price (criterion 5) is weighted at 30 %. Under each qualitative criterion, detailed sub‑criteria are listed (e.g. team organisation, quality assurance, communication and reporting, change management, site supervision concept). Qualitative sub‑criteria are scored from 0 to 5 points based on how well the proposal meets the requirements; price is converted into points via a linear interpolation method with a cap at twice the lowest bid. The final ranking uses an extended “price‑performance” formula (Kennzahl Z = Leistungspunkte x 100,000 / Preis), and only offers reaching at least 70 % of the possible qualitative points (350 points) are considered.

Such as indicated under “Beschreibung der finanziellen Sicherheit” and further contract clauses, key risks and special conditions include a 5 % contract performance security retained from each payment up to 5 % of the actual total fee; this can be replaced by an unlimited, self‑debtor bank guarantee from an EU/EEA credit institution. Retentions relating to Leistungsstufen 1–4 are released after partial acceptance if no claims exist. The contractor must set up and staff a site office from performance stage 4, with at least one qualified employee present at least two days per week. There are strong obligations regarding cost control, schedule management, coordination with other disciplines, and change management; the client may order changes (including urgent ones) with defined procedures and limited negotiation periods. Subcontracting is allowed but controlled: other companies must be listed and committed via III.7 and III.8, may not have exclusion grounds, and must be replaced if found unsuitable. Offers must be electronic in German, with no variants, no multiple offers, and a 60‑day validity (Bindefrist). Questions must be submitted via the platform by 24.11.2026, 10:00; references cannot be requested after the deadline (Nachforderung von Referenzen ausgeschlossen).

Such as derived from the interplay between TED, III.116, III.118 and III.106.1, apparent contradictions are resolved by the more specific, later or marked “abweichend” instructions in the detailed forms. For example, III.118 generally states that certain proofs are only to be submitted “auf gesondertes Verlangen”, but III.106.1 and III.116 explicitly tick options that the professional status proofs, insurance documents, staff details, subcontractor forms III.7 and III.8, and references are “abweichend” with the offer and listed in III.116 as to be submitted by the deadline. Where the TED notice only generically says that evidence is listed in III.106.1, the concrete checkboxes in III.106.1 and III.116 govern. Also, while Formblatt III.27 (Erklärung Bezug Russland) is described in III.118 as generally mandatory, III.116 in this specific procedure leaves it unticked; therefore, for this tender the Russia‑related declaration is not required with the offer unless the platform or a clarification explicitly demands it. In case of doubt, the combination of the Aufforderung zur Angebotsabgabe (III.116), the Eigenerklärung III.106.1 with its marked deviations, and the TED notice should be treated as the binding interpretation, and any remaining uncertainty should be clarified via the question tool before 24.11.2026.