26-088528 Equipement technique E

✓Where the Aufforderung indicates “auf gesondertes Verlangen” (e.g. references, III.8), these documents are only submitted if requested, and missing references cannot be post‑requested under § 56 VgV.

✓Such as captured in the Eigenerklärung III.106.1 and the TED Eignungskriterien section, minimum qualification requirements cover: (1) professional authorisation (special Berufsstand), including the right to use the relevant engineering title, potentially registration under BayBO/BauKaG or equivalent EU recognition; for this tender the key role is “Ingenieur Elektrotechnik oder gleichwertig” for project leader, deputy, and site manager.

❓(2) Economic and financial capacity, in particular an existing Berufshaftpflichtversicherung with minimum coverage 0.5 Mio EUR for personal injury and 1.5 Mio EUR for other damages, double annual aggregate limit, continuous cover over the contract period; where policies have undifferentiated lump limits, an insurer’s declaration is required.

✓(3) Specific turnover in the contract field over the last three business years (average minimum threshold to be filled in the form, with later submission of audited accounts on request).

✓(4) Average annual staffing and project staff qualifications and years of experience, with the Personaleinsatz form specifying required experience bands (e.g. ≥10, 7–<10, 5–<7 years).

❓(5) Technical and professional capacity, demonstrated by at least three comparable references using III.110a‑TGA, completed LPh 8 in the period 01.10.2019–30.09.2026, with required scope (HOAI Honorarzone II, costs in KGr 440/450/460 above stated thresholds, complex refurbishment, monument protection, lifts, dealing with asbestos, etc.).

✓Additional evidence on quality assurance, research capabilities, and environmental management measures may be demanded; some are marked as “abweichend ... mit dem Angebot einzureichen” if the contracting authority ticks that option.

✓Such as set out in Formblatt III.16.1 and reiterated in the TED notice, the award criteria and weighting follow § 58 VgV.

✓The overall weighting is 70 % for qualitative criteria and 30 % for price.

✓Within quality, the main criteria and their weights are: 1) Auftragsbezogenes Organisationskonzept (19 %) – with subcriteria such as project team composition and capacity planning, quality assurance, and organisation of planning documents/data exchange; 2) Auftragsbezogene Qualifikation und Erfahrung der Projektmitarbeiter (19 %) – including degrees, CVs, reference projects (three per key staff) and demonstrated practical experience; 3) Auftragsbezogenes Konzept zum Ablauf der Planungsphase (12 %) – covering communication/reporting with the client, coordination of other disciplines, and change management; 4) Auftragsbezogenes Konzept zum Ablauf der Baudurchführungsphase (20 %) – including site supervision concept, organisation of billing/measurement/quality/cost/time control, and handling of disturbances/change and claims management; and 6) Lösungsvorschlag (weight 0 % in the provided table, suggesting it may be formally listed but not scored).

✓The price criterion (5) carries 30 %, and price scoring uses a 0‑5 point scale where 5 points go to the lowest price, 0 points to a hypothetical offer at twice that price, with linear interpolation for intermediate prices and multiplication by the weight.

✓Qualitative subcriteria are scored from 0 to 5 points (optimal fulfilment to inadequate), multiplied by their respective weights.

✓Only offers reaching at least 70 % of maximum performance points (≥350 points) pass the hurdle; for those remaining, the economic ranking is determined by an extended “Richtwertmethode” formula Z = L × 100,000 / P (L = performance points, P = price/value sum), with the highest Z receiving the award; ties are resolved by drawing lots.

✓Such as visible in the contract conditions, Bewerbungsbedingungen, and TED “Bedingungen für die Auftragsvergabe”, several risks and special conditions apply.

✓The procedure mandates electronic communication and submission only; late, paper‑based, or informal offers are excluded.

✓Variants (Nebenangebote) are generally stated as “nicht zugelassen” in the TED extract, but Formblatt III.118 still details the rules in case Nebenangebote are permitted in other procedures; here the specific line 4.1 in III.116 is ticked “Nebenangebote sind nicht zugelassen”, superseding general provisions.

✓There is a 5 % security retained from each payment up to 5 % of the actual total fee, as performance guarantee, which can be replaced by a self‑schuldnerische, unbounded bank guarantee from an EU‑licensed bank or credit insurer; retainage or securities for Leistungsstufen 1–4 are to be released after partial acceptance of those stages unless claims have been asserted.

✓Subcontracting and Eignungsleihe are regulated: all intended subcontracting or capacity borrowing must be declared using III.106.1 and III.7; in cases of Eignungsleihe for economic/financial criteria, joint liability via III.8 is required, and the bidder must replace third parties found unsuitable or affected by exclusion grounds within a set deadline.

✓Bietergemeinschaften must pre‑exist at the time of tender, each member submits its own Eigenerklärung, and a joint declaration III.9 is needed, with all members jointly and severally liable.

✓The “Eigenerklärung Bezug Russland” III.27 is generally mandatory under III.118; the TED notice explicitly requires it with the participation application and also from subcontractors/Eignungsverleiher above 10 % of contract value, and offers missing it are to be excluded.

✓The question deadline for clarifications is 24.11.2026, 10:00; all questions must be submitted via the platform’s Q&A tool.

✓Public opening is on 30.11.2026, 10:00, with only client representatives admitted; site visits are not explicitly described in the excerpts.