B19022-30039002-001-440-04 Installations électriques de câblage des bâtiments, courant fort

✓The award criteria and procedural conditions are, such as, a pure price criterion (“Art: Preis”) without technical scoring, with variants and multiple offers excluded.

✓Additional information can be requested via the platform until 17/11/2026, 12:00, and bidder questions and answers are only visible within the specific procedure on the Berlin platform.

❓The contracting authority may, at its discretion and in line with VOB/A EU, request missing documents after the submission deadline.

✓A submission session occurs without public attendance.

✓Complaints and review procedures follow GWB §160, §134 and §135, with specified deadlines for rügen and Nachprüfungsanträge before the Vergabekammer des Landes Berlin.

✓The contractor must appoint a permanent, responsible site manager/polier with written powers.

✓There is no site security by the client; the contractor bears the risk of theft of tools and materials with no compensation from the client.

✓Damage and contamination must be remedied continuously at the contractor’s cost; any damage to trees, pavements, neighbouring structures etc. must be fully restored by the responsible party.

✓Hazardous substance handling, including asbestos, requires demonstrable specialist competence, named supervisory personnel, written Betriebsanweisungen, documented safety briefings, and full compliance with BG “Kontaminierte Bereiche” rules and SiGe‑Plan; non‑qualified subcontractors may be rejected.

✓Waste management must comply with KrWG, KrW-/AbfG Bln, NachwV, AVV, GewAbfV, MantelV, including separation by waste code, use of approved EFB with notified IDs, electronic evidence procedure, limits on on‑site interim storage, and inclusion of all waste‑related costs in unit prices.

✓Regarding possible contradictions or corrections, the documents are, such as, largely consistent: they repeatedly confirm that (i) execution conditions and waste handling are fully priced in the unit rates; (ii) maintenance transfer under VOB/B §13(4) via a separate maintenance contract is “nichtzutreffend”; and (iii) the award criterion is solely price.

✓One potential ambiguity is the statement that the contract is “nicht für KMU geeignet”, which contrasts with generic remarks that the procurement is suitable for SMEs in some EU templates—here the controlling statement in the TED notice (“geeignet: nein”) applies.

❓Another area where bidders must be attentive is the interplay between general VOB‑C/ATV obligations and project‑specific requirements in the LV and Projekthandbuch; such as, if there is any discrepancy between generic DIN 18299 references and explicit LV texts (e.g. documentation standards), the more specific contractual LV/Projekthandbuch provision will typically prevail.

✓Where the LV labels certain aspects as “nicht relevant” or “nichtzutreffend” (e.g. beistellung von Stoffen, besondere Gerüstanforderungen, Mitwirkung bei Inbetriebnahmen), bidders should rely on those explicit exclusions unless amended via answers on the Vergabeplattform; any conflicting impression from generic ATV norms must be clarified by timely bidder questions before 17/11/2026.