Contrat réservé aux centres spéciaux d'emploi des entreprises d'initiative sociale et d'insertion, qui a pour objet le service de nettoyage des bureaux de la société publique Sociedad de Servicios del Principado de Asturias, S.A., M.P. dans le bâtiment de l'Universidad Laboral de Gijón

✓The CPV is 90919200 (office cleaning services).

✓The estimated value is 30,221.71 EUR and the budget base of tender is 36,568.27 EUR (30,221.71 EUR without taxes).

✓The initial execution period is 12 months, with the possibility of a single 12‑month extension (maximum one renewal).

✓The place of performance is Asturias (sub‑entity ES120) in Spain.

✓The contract is reserved, under the 4th Additional Provision of the LCSP, exclusively to “centros especiales de empleo de iniciativa social” and “empresas de inserción”, and the bidder must declare that it is duly constituted as one of those types and registered in the corresponding registers, and that the cleaning services fall within its statutory purpose or activity.

✓The tender is processed as an “abierto simplificado” procedure with ordinary processing and is not subject to EU harmonised thresholds nor to the GPA.

✓Offers must be submitted through the Plataforma until 10/11/2026 at 00:00, with public opening of the single envelope and economic offer on 10/11/2026 at 10:00 at SERPA’s offices in Gijón.

✓The offer validity period is 3 months.

❓On award criteria and weighting, the procedure is purely based on criteria automatically evaluable by formulas, for a total of 100 points.

✓The economic offer (total contract price, including all taxes, fees and other costs) carries 70 points; the bidder must fill in the total price in Anexo I.2 and it cannot exceed the maximum tender budget.

✓In addition, there are three non‑price criteria: (i) “Bolsa de horas” (additional hours) worth 10 points, where the bidder must tick whether such a pool of hours is offered (the annex suggests a binary “sí se oferta / no se oferta” option); (ii) maximum incident response time, worth 10 points, with a predefined scale (up to 1 hour = 10 points; >1–2 h = 8; >2–3 h = 6; >3–4 h = 4; >4–5 h = 2; >5 h = 0), where the bidder selects the corresponding bracket; and (iii) use of cleaning products with low environmental impact, worth 10 points, where the bidder states the percentage of products with EU Ecolabel (or equivalent type I label under UNE‑EN ISO 14024) and, if such products are proposed, attaches a list of products with commercial name and label.

✓No qualitative, subjectively evaluated criteria appear in the extract, and there is no electronic auction.

✓As for risks and special conditions, the text highlights several important issues.

✓The contract is marked as “contrato reservado” to social‑initiative sheltered workshops and social insertion companies, so ineligibility outside those categories is a hard exclusion risk.

✓Admission conditions require capacity to contract, absence of prohibitions, tax and Social Security compliance and preregistration in ROLECE.

✓A prominent special condition of execution of a social nature, under article 202 LCSP and the applicable collective agreement (Convenio de Limpieza de Edificios y Locales del Principado de Asturias), is the obligatory subrogation by the contractor of the two workers currently providing the cleaning service; the bidder must expressly acknowledge awareness of this obligation and commit to provide the necessary personal and material resources, including all cleaning utensils, products and equipment, maintaining them in proper condition throughout the contract.

✓Strategic contracting elements cited are “prevención y control de la contaminación” and “condiciones de trabajo justas”, consistent with the environmental and social award criteria.

✓The documents state that electronic ordering, e‑invoicing and e‑payment will not be used.

❓The text does not explicitly mention penalties, guarantees, limits on subcontracting, site visits or deadlines for questions in the excerpts provided; such aspects are likely regulated in the PCAP and technical specifications referenced but not reproduced here, so bidders must consult those documents on the Plataforma.

✓The offers’ validity period is clearly fixed at 3 months.

✓Regarding contradictions or corrections within the documents, the extracts from the various files (01‑placsp‑3.pdf/.txt, 02‑placsp‑6.pdf/.txt and 03‑placsp‑7.zip/.txt) are consistent and largely duplicative rather than conflicting.

✓The basic data (expediente 026_12, object, reserved nature, values, term, CPV, procedure type, award criteria and weightings, place and time for offer submission and opening, role of Anexo I.1 and I.2, admission conditions and ROLECE preregistration requirement) are repeated identically across the notice and pliego summary.

✓No divergent dates, amounts, criteria or conditions appear in the portions transcribed.

✓Where the text says “Otros – Ver cláusula 4.2 del PCAP” for solvency, this is a cross‑reference, not a contradiction; the PCAP is expressly stated as the governing document, so in case of any discrepancy not visible here, the explicit wording of the PCAP and technical specifications would prevail over the summary notice, but based on the input provided there are no internal contradictions that require choosing one statement over another.