Fourniture locative, ainsi que la conception, l'installation, l'entretien et le démontage de l'éclairage et de l'ornementation de Noël dans les bâtiments municipaux et les rues (2026/2027).

✓Luis de la Concha, 66, 39470 Renedo de Piélagos, Spain, as the administrative address; operationally it covers municipal buildings and streets in the municipality.

✓The execution period is 36 days.

✓Offers must be submitted electronically via the external system (Vortal, URL indicated) by 04/11/2026 at 15:00.

✓On award criteria and weighting, the text only defines the procedure type as “Procedimiento Abierto simplificado” (simplified open procedure) with ordinary processing and explicitly states that there will be no electronic auction (“Se adjudicará mediante subasta electrónica: No”).

❓However, such as specific award criteria (price weighting, qualitative criteria and their percentages, scoring formulas) are not included in this extract; they are normally spelled out in the PCAP or in the “detalle de la licitación” accessible through the provided link.

❓Therefore, from the given text we only know the procedure type and that there is no e-auction, but not the detailed award criteria or their weighting.

❓Concerning risks and special conditions, the text provided does not specify penalties, guarantees, subcontracting rules, bid validity period, question deadlines, or obligatory/optional site visits.

✓It only notes general administrative aspects, such as: the contract is not subject to harmonised EU regulation, there is no EU funding, offers must be submitted electronically, and the contracting authority is the Mayor’s Office of the Ayuntamiento de Piélagos.

❓Such as contractual penalties for delay, required performance guarantees, possible limitations or conditions on subcontracting, and the exact validity period of bids would typically be contained in the PCAP and the “Pliego de Prescripciones Técnicas”, which are listed as available documents but whose detailed content is not reproduced here.

❓Any deadline for questions/clarifications or information about site visits is also not shown in this text.

✓On contradictions or corrections within the documents, the information reproduced here is highly repetitive but consistent.

✓The object of the contract, values (estimated value 55,495 EUR and tender budget 67,148.95 EUR including tax), execution period (36 days), place of performance (ES130, Cantabria; Renedo de Piélagos), submission deadline (04/11/2026 at 15:00), and procedure type (open simplified, no e-auction) are stated several times in an identical way.

✓The only differences are technical (two timestamps: 21-10-2026 08:31 for the “anuncio de licitación” and 08:32 for the “documento de pliegos”), which is normal and not a contradiction.

✓There are no conflicting statements in this extract about scope, deadlines, or conditions.

❓As in standard Spanish practice, such as any conflict between the summary notice and the full tender documents, the PCAP (Pliego de Cláusulas Administrativas Particulares) and PPT (technical specifications) would prevail over the platform summary; however, this rule is inferred from general Spanish procurement practice rather than explicitly stated in the text provided.