Service d'appui pour la communication et la conception graphique environnementale pour Rivas – Vaciamadrid EMS S.A garantissant une diffusion efficace de ses messages environnementaux, qui aient un impact positif sur une meilleure ville pour les habitants de la commune. Ce service couvrira un conseil en commun

✓CPV codes include 79341400 (advertising campaign services), 79822500 (graphic design services) and 79970000 (editing services).

⚠The SDA duration is 36 months from the date of first homologation, with no renewals; one part of the documentation also indicates a specific execution period “Del 09/05/2025 al 09/05/2027,” which is consistent with a two‑year execution window within an overall 36‑month SDA validity.

✓Place of performance is Madrid, Spain (Rivas‑Vaciamadrid).

✓The platform settings show that the offer validity is 36 months and that submission deadline for joining the SDA in the first round is 09/05/2025 at 23:59.

✓Award criteria are described at two levels: the SDA itself and the contracts based on it.

✓For the SDA admission, the platform displays “El SDA no tiene criterios de adjudicación, sólo se configura a efectos de la presentación en plataforma: Precio, Ponderación 100,” which means price is only a formal criterion in the electronic form, without real award weighting at SDA creation.

✓The actual award criteria for contracts based on the SDA are “varios criterios objetivos y subjetivos.” Such as, price or cost of the services can represent between 0% and 100% of the total score, while other quality‑related criteria (e.g. reduction of delivery times, quality of materials and execution, post‑sale service and guarantees) may represent between 0% and 40% of the score; the specific distribution will be defined in each contract based on the SDA.

✓There is a minimum number of five bidders to be invited, and no electronic auction is used.

✓Risks and special conditions are set out mainly in the CCP.

✓Such as, a definitive guarantee of 5% of the award price must be provided prior to adjudication for each specific contract, and the contractor remains liable for six months after the reception act.

✓Special execution conditions include social and environmental clauses: promoting employment of people with disabilities or at risk of exclusion, training and sensitization actions for the assigned staff, measures promoting gender equality and work‑life balance, and maintaining or improving environmental values affected by the contract, including use of renewable energy and recycled materials.

✓Non‑compliance with these special conditions is a serious breach, enabling either contract termination or penalties up to 10% of the contract price (excluding VAT).

✓Penalties specific to the SDA include, for example, suspension from participation for six months for failing to submit offers or submitting defective offers in based contracts, suspension for 2–4 months for culpable defective execution of a based contract, and a daily delay penalty of 3% of the based contract value per day of delay.

✓The SDA also clarifies there is no personal‑data processing or third‑party data transfer by the contractor in this case (boxes marked “No”), and coordination of business activities (CAEs) is marked “No” for this contract, although if it were applied, the best‑rated bidder would have to complete Annex IX.

✓The documents are multilingual‑friendly (may be in Spanish, English or French).

❓There is no mention of subcontracting restrictions beyond general LCSP rules, and no site visit requirement appears; resources and challenges are to be addressed through the normal LCSP remedies via the Council of Administration of Rivamadrid.

⚠Regarding contradictions or corrections within the documents, the text contains some apparent divergences that are clarified by context.

✓Such as, the SDA notice states “El SDA no tiene criterios de adjudicación, sólo se configura a efectos de la presentación en plataforma: Precio 100,” while the CCP and justification documents speak of “criterios objetivos y subjetivos” for adjudication: the correct interpretation is that the SDA setup in the platform has no substantive award criteria, but each contract based on the SDA will apply the detailed objective and subjective criteria described in the CCP (price 0–100%, quality criteria 0–40%).

⚠Likewise, there is a minor tension between the 36‑month duration and the explicit execution period “09/05/2025–09/05/2027”; the governing statement is the CCP clause that sets an initial duration of 36 months from first homologation, with no prorogation, so the dated execution window refers to specific contracts or the platform configuration rather than limiting the SDA’s legal duration.

✓Finally, the list of homologated suppliers is expressly described as non‑limiting and subject to ongoing updates as more candidates are evaluated under the CCP; therefore, any earlier list is indicative only, and the later agreement by the contracting authority formally approves the homologation proposal of the tender committee as the prevailing statement.