Soumissionner dans ce pays : portails, délais, seuils →
Système de surveillance central basé sur le cloud (SaaS)
Cloudgebaseerd centraal monitoringsysteem (SaaS) — titre original
Votre chemin vers le dépôt
- Date limite de réception des candidatures : 20 novembre à 23:55 — encore 20 jours. Procédure en deux étapes : avant cette date, vous déposez une candidature (justificatifs de capacité). Seuls les candidats retenus sont ensuite invités à remettre une offre.
- Le dépôt se fait sur BDA / e-Procurement Belgium — pas ici, pas par e-mail. ↗
- Réunissez vos justificatifs — les exigences figurent sur cette page ; pour beaucoup, l'analyse explique comment les obtenir.
Ce que recherche l'acheteur
L’IMT dispose d’un système central de surveillance (ci-après le «CMS»), un système automatisé de mesure, de surveillance, d’alerte et d’enregistrement des paramètres physiques — températures, humidité relative, concentrations de CO2, différences de pression, récipients cryo-stockage de mesure de niveau, ... — dans les réfrigérateurs, congélateurs, ULT, incubateurs, salles de laboratoire et autres environnements critiques. L’accord avec le contractant actuel pour le CMS expire le 30/04/2027. L’IMT recherche donc un contractant pour la poursuite du CMS.
Marché
Type de prestation
Clement Ce que les chiffres disent de cet acheteur
- 0 % des attributions de cet acheteur sont allées à des entreprises qui avaient déjà gagné ici (35 attributions depuis 2019, réparties sur 22 entreprises). 100 % sont allées à de nouveaux noms.n = 35 attributions depuis 2019
- En médiane, 2 offres par procédure (19 procédures avec nombre d'offres) ; 26 % se sont terminées avec un seul candidat. Secteur : 2 offres en médiane.n = 19
- 31 % des attributions sont allées à des entreprises étrangères (35 attributions au pays du titulaire connu). Moyenne du secteur : 34 %.n = 35
À partir des attributions documentées de cet acheteur ; valeurs de comparaison du même secteur et du même pays. Ni prévision, ni conseil juridique. Au 01/11/2026.
Le dossier de consultation en bref
L'essentiel du dossier de consultation, vérifié point par point dans les documents. Pour votre offre, seuls les documents originaux font foi.
Propulsé par eBriefing – technologie linguistique de l'UE. Friedrich est un service indépendant, pas une offre de l'UE.
✓ figure dans les documents · ❓ introuvable dans les documents ou indication générale · Disponible en anglais.
Cloudgebaseerd Centraal Monitoring Systeem (SaaS) – Selectieleidraad ITG 2026-AAN-26
The input text concerns a Belgian public procurement procedure launched by the Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITG) in Antwerp, Belgium, for a cloud-based Central Monitoring System (CMS) in a critical laboratory environment.
It is written from the perspective of Belgian public procurement law (Wet Overheidsopdrachten, KB Plaatsing, KB Uitvoering) and refers to EU instruments such as eCertis and EU social security obligations, but the contractual and procedural framework is clearly Belgian.
The text specifies in detail which documents a bidder must submit at the *selection* stage (aanvraag tot deelneming).
Such as, the bidder must use the official “Formulier voor aanvraag tot deelneming” (Stuk 1) and upload it via e‑Procurement.
In addition, the bidder must provide evidence on exclusion grounds (Stuk 2), including for Belgian bidders a special criminal record extract model 596.1–32 and for foreign bidders equivalent extracts and certificates on fiscal, social debts and non‑bankruptcy, or sworn declarations if such documents are not issued.
For economic and financial capacity, the bidder must submit a declaration of total turnover for the last three available financial years (Stuk 3) showing an average annual turnover of at least €200,000.
For technical and professional capacity, the bidder must add at least three reference projects from the last five years (Stuk 4) in critical environments (labs, hospitals, pharma, biobanks, cleanrooms, research, etc.), each with at least 100 monitoring points, plus an organogram and CVs of key staff (Stuk 5) showing at minimum one project leader/account manager, one technical specialist with ≥3 years experience in monitoring systems, and one support staff member for maintenance and incident management.
Quality and information security must be evidenced by an ISO 9001 certificate or equivalent and description of the quality management system (Stuk 6), and an ISO 27001 certificate or equivalent and description of the information security policy (Stuk 7).
If the bidder relies on the capacity of other entities/ subcontractors, it must add for each such entity a signed “Verbintenis terbeschikkingstelling middelen” (Stuk 8) confirming that the entity will make the necessary resources available and is not subject to exclusion grounds.
Regarding scope, the contract concerns the continuation and replacement of ITG’s existing CMS used to monitor critical physical parameters (temperature, humidity, CO2, pressure differences, cryo vessel levels, etc.) in freezers, incubators, laboratory rooms and other sensitive environments at ITG’s site in Antwerp.
Such as, the scope includes installation, configuration and validation of CMS software; migration of the existing environment and historical data to the new solution while preserving continuity; ongoing maintenance, SLA, hosting and licenses for the CMS software; and supply of hardware like measurement probes and transmitters.
Afficher les 48 éléments
The solution must be functionally compatible with ITG’s extensive existing sensor and transmitter infrastructure (listed in a later paragraph 6.3.2), meaning it must be able to receive and process data from current equipment and preserve or make accessible existing historical data and alarm configurations, whether natively or via gateways/middleware.
The initial contract term is 4 years from provisional acceptance, with up to four one‑year renewals (maximum total 8 years), entirely at the discretion of the contracting authority and without any right for the contractor to claim renewal or compensation if ITG decides not to renew; renewals, if any, are notified by registered mail at least three months before expiry.
On award criteria and weighting, the text clarifies the procedure but leaves the detailed criteria to a later document.
Such as, the placement is a “mededingingsprocedure met onderhandeling” under article 38, §1, 1°, f) of the Belgian Overheidsopdrachtenwet.
First there is a selection phase based on the above selection criteria; selected candidates then receive the full specifications and are invited to submit initial offers.
ITG may negotiate with one or more tenderers, in successive phases, potentially reducing the number of participants by applying the award criteria.
The contract will be awarded to the economically most advantageous tender, based on the best price‑quality ratio, but the precise award criteria and their weighting will only be communicated in the second phase (the bestek after selection), and therefore are not yet specified in the current text.
Such as, bids must be submitted electronically via the Belgian e‑Procurement platform, and completion must be confirmed by pressing the “Verzenden” button; otherwise the offer will not be received.
All questions must be submitted via the e‑Procurement forum no later than 10 days before the deadline for receipt of offers; messages on that forum form an integral part of the contract.
Communication must be in Dutch or English, but the Dutch documents are the only legally binding version; in case of discrepancy, the Dutch text prevails.
The contract term of up to 8 years is justified by the critical nature of the laboratory infrastructure and the high operational and compliance switch costs; this long term increases dependency risk for the contractor but also creates long‑term obligations to maintain compatibility and service levels.
When a bidder relies on the capacity of other entities, those entities must not be subject to exclusion grounds and must actually perform the services for which their capacity is used; replacing them requires prior consent of ITG.
There is mention of the general Belgian “KB Uitvoering” as the source of contractual execution rules (typically including penalties and guarantees), but detailed penalties, performance guarantees, insurance requirements or site‑visit obligations are not described in the provided excerpts and would presumably appear in the later bestek issued only to selected candidates.
Concerning contradictions or corrections, the text itself resolves at least one potential conflict: language versions.
Such as, it explicitly states that any English translation is purely informative and that in case of errors, contradictions or interpretative differences between the Dutch and translated versions, the Dutch original always prevails; ITG cannot be held liable for translation errors.
There is no internal contradiction about the contract duration: section 1.5 states a base term of 4 years plus four one‑year renewals (total maximum 8 years), and section 6 repeats that the maximum duration is 8 years and explains the rationale; these statements are consistent.
Award criteria are deliberately left unspecified at this stage, but this is described clearly as a matter for the second phase rather than a discrepancy.
Where instructions in different places overlap (e.g. the list of required documents in chapter 3 and the same list recast as Stuk 1–8 in chapter 4), they are consistent, with chapter 4 functioning as a practical checklist rather than changing earlier requirements.
Answers on the required criteria
Must securities be provided (bid bond, performance or warranty guarantee)? If so: which, in what amount and by when?
Such as regards securities (bid bond, performance or warranty guarantees), the provided text does not mention any requirement for the submission of a bid bond or performance/warranty guarantees in the selection phase.
If securities are required, they would have to be specified later in the full tender documents (“bestek”) provided only to selected candidates; they are not described in the excerpts given.
Is subcontracting allowed? If so: with which limits and which disclosure duties?
Such as regards subcontracting, the text explains the concept of “beroep op draagkracht” (reliance on the capacity of other entities).
Candidates may rely on the economic/financial or technical/professional capacity of other entrepreneurs, including under‑contractors, to meet selection criteria.
In that case, they must submit a “Verbintenis terbeschikkingstelling middelen” (commitment to make resources available) for each such entity, and those entities must not fall under exclusion grounds and must actually perform the parts of the services linked to the capacity relied upon.
It is explicitly stated that the use of other subcontractors without relying on their capacity remains possible both during the award and execution of the contract; this is allowed but not further regulated in these excerpts beyond the duty to seek prior permission if they replace entities whose capacity was used for selection.
Is there a site visit, and is attendance mandatory? If so: when?
Such as concerns site visits, the input text does not mention any visit to the site of the contracting authority, nor does it state any obligation to attend a site visit.
The described procedure covers application to participate, selection, invitation to submit initial offers, and possible negotiations, but no site meeting or inspection requirement is referenced in the sections provided.
In which language must the tender and the supporting documents be submitted, and are documents in other languages accepted?
Such as regards language of tenders and supporting documents, the text states that the tender documents are drawn up in Dutch and that this Dutch version is the only legally binding version.
It further clarifies that tenderers must use exclusively Dutch or English in their oral and written communications with the contracting authority.
An English translation of the documents can be supplied on request but is only informative and may contain inaccuracies; in case of discrepancies, the original Dutch document prevails.
How long is the bidder bound by the tender (validity period), and is there a deadline for bidder questions? If so: until when?
Such as concerns the validity period of tenders and the deadline for bidder questions, the excerpts specify a clear questions deadline: all questions relating to the contract must be submitted via the e‑Procurement forum no later than 10 days before the final deadline for receipt of tenders; after that, no further questions can be asked.
The text also states that the initial phase is an “aanvraag tot deelneming” submitted via e‑Procurement and that questions and clarifications posted on the forum form an integral part of the contract.
However, the validity period (how long bidders are bound by their tender) is not explicitly provided in the sections shown and would presumably be set out later in the full “bestek” sent to selected candidates.
Further details
The input text concerns a public procurement procedure in Belgium by the Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde (Institute of Tropical Medicine) in Antwerp for a cloud‑based Central Monitoring System (CMS) delivered as SaaS.
It is a selection guideline (“selectieleidraad”) for a competitive negotiated procedure under Belgian public procurement law (Wet Overheidsopdrachten, KB Plaatsing, KB Uitvoering).
The perspective is clearly that of a Belgian contracting authority operating under EU‑member‑state procurement rules, and the text also refers to obligations of foreign (non‑Belgian) candidates within this framework.
The focus is on exclusion grounds, financial capacity (minimum average annual turnover of €200,000 over the last three years), technical and professional capacity, and certifications (ISO 9001 and ISO 27001 or equivalent).
Seuls les documents de l'acheteur font foi. Mis à jour: 30/10/2026
Qui a déjà gagné chez cet acheteur
Tous types de marchés de cet acheteur confondus — pas seulement ce secteur. Une ville achète logiciels et véhicules d'incendie au même service achats.
| Entreprise | Attributions | Période |
|---|---|---|
| MediPortal | 1 | 2025 |
| KARAKTERS | 1 | 2024 |
| AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES BELGIUM | 1 | 2025 |
| Analis NV | 1 | 2024 |
| Veolia Environmental Services NV | 1 | 2024 |
À quelle fréquence cet acheteur lance ce type de marché
Tactique
Lorsque des marchés ont été attribués dans ce pays et ce secteur, il n'arrivait le plus souvent qu'une ou deux offres. Une offre solide a ici de vraies chances. (D'après 361 attributions terminées — aucune indication sur cette procédure.)
Cette procédure laisse 31 jours entre la publication et la date limite — l'usage dans ce pays est de 34 (médiane de 3 233 procédures). Une fenêtre normale pour ce marché.
Soumissionnaires étrangers
En Belgique · Logiciels & systèmes informatiques, 176 marchés ont été remportés par des entreprises étrangères sur 3 ans (sur 607 attributions recensées) — principalement : France, Allemagne, Pays-Bas.
Comment candidater
Ne manquez pas le prochain
Friedrich trouve des marchés comme celui-ci pour vous — chaque matin à 7 h 30, chacun vérifié par Claude (Anthropic), et il apprend de vos retours ce que fait vraiment votre entreprise.
S'inscrire maintenant